How do we mobilize support for Joe Pantalone?

102 posts / 0 new
Last post
Lord Palmerston
How do we mobilize support for Joe Pantalone?

*

Stockholm

Olly wrote:

Holy crap, do you not know this guy's history? He's been arrested a few times, has been drunk in public at Leafs games and lashed out at other fans, his wife called the police on him at one point. The guy is serious trouble, and an extreme right wing agenda to boot. There are threads about his past behaviour on rabble. And he'll be representing us as mayor? I'll take Smitherman any day.

This all tells me that Ford is a bit of an asshole and would be incompetent and an object of ridicule as mayor. It will be embarrassing for Toronto to be represented by him internationally - but we already endured Mel Lastman and Washington DC survived having a cocaine addict Marion Barry as mayor.

Ultimately, Ford's obvious personality disorders are a problem for the people who will have to work with directly with him. I look at it from the point of view of what he would do that would actually affect citizens of Toronto. I suspect that if he was mayor he would be like Larry O'Brien in Ottawa - there would be a lot of screaming and yelling and paralysis and nothing of any substance will happen. Just about all of his policies are things he has no power to do as mayor (ie: cutting the number of councillors from 44 to 22 would require provincial legislation and a vote of the city council to fire 50% of its own members - not gonna happen).

If Smitherman wants to be the beneficiary of an "anyone but Ford" sentiment - then here is what I suggest for him:

*rescind his promise to cut property taxes

*promise not to contract out or privatize anything and not to have any P3s

*resign from the Liberal party (like Miller quit the NDP) and announce that he will take a non-partisan approach to governing the city and that NDPers and red Tories will play a role in his administration along with all the Libs.

I'm not holding my breath for him to do any of those things. 

Lord Palmerston

"Funny thing I didn't mention Miller at all.  It is not one person or one thing.  "Come on down baby", comments, ignoring the the voters in Etobicoke, Scarborough and North York, cost over runs, city hall that getting answers, pay legal bills agast legal advice, a garbage strike.  All of that plus voters are mad at all politicans in Ottawa and Quuens Park but they are getting their first shot municipally.  You know what they say about us on the left side of things.  We don't have to worry about the right.  We will do ourselves!!!"

A political:  Let me get this straight.  Your premise is that Miller is so unpopular in Etobicoke/North York/Scarborough that the only viable anti-Ford candidate is Smitherman?

Cueball Cueball's picture

I always knew you had a sense of humour Stockholm. None of those things are possible for Smitherman because unlike Ford, Smitherman takes his marching orders from Dalton McGuinty.

writer writer's picture

To actually address the OP's question. Mobilize support by getting involved yourself. And spread the word about Joe. I think Cueball is right (previous thread) - at the moment, Pantalone is not on many people's radar.

Up with Pants!

Volunteer, donate, get a sign, go to events, let the campaign staff know about events, talk to everyone around you. Lots to do!

http://mayorjoe.ca/
http://www.mayorjoe.ca/get-involved/
http://www.mayorjoe.ca/events/
http://www.mayorjoe.ca/donate/

Edited to add:

Quote:

The Problem With Campaigning Against Cities

It is hard to believe what a terrible city Toronto has become. One candidate says we can’t take care of the 2.5 million people who live here. Another warns darkly about “more of the same” that has left us in “the current mess.” Only one, the deputy mayor who is carrying the legacy of the incumbent regime, is upbeat on the city, but he gets drowned out in the raucous litany of abuse. Failure lurks around every corner, financial collapse is at hand, dispirit darkens every city street.

... Yet we must be doing something right. Toronto keeps rising in the world ranking of cities as a financial powerhouse and a great place to live. As The Telegraph UK recently wrote, “Toronto nowadays is a progressive and welcoming city with a thriving economy, flourishing arts scene and renowned cuisine. Its education and healthcare provision are among the best in the world.”

Cueball Cueball's picture

A vote for Joe is a vote for the little guy!

writer writer's picture

A new title for this thread:

Pull Up Your Pants!

Cueball Cueball's picture

I read today on someones Facebook that you can vote for "the ultra-right, the extreme right, the right or the loony right. Or you can vote for Joe Pantalone for Mayor."

Lord Palmerston

I had a look at the Nanos polls cross-tabs.  Unless Joe gets some momentum, Ford has it in the bag.  Still, I think it inflates Ford's support somewhat.  I find it difficult to believe he's at 37% of decided voters (and 29% of all voters) in the Old City of Toronto.

Cueball Cueball's picture

Again, I have to reiterate the point that the mayor above all sets the tone for council decision making. The mayor is not a president. So, in fact the battle takes us beyond the immediate frame of the election and into the next council, where we need to make the point that there is no clear mandate to sell off Toronto.

Cueball Cueball's picture

I entirely agree that a vote for Joe is a vote for transit city.

Ford's popularity is aesthetic. It is not going to rub off on anyone else.

takeitslowly

the way to support Joe is to not make it about Joe, but to make it about saving Transit City from a Ford take over. And take inspirations from Obama, he stated "The challenge, I think, for the Tea Party movement is to identify specifically what would you do. It's not enough just to say 'get control of spending,'"

i think Ford is going to be mayor, but he is going to release a slate of candidates to help support his policies on the council. we need to prevent those councillors from being elected.
And Joe needs to practise his lines better.
 
edited* and stop the personal attacks on Ford, i cannot believe my eyes today when i read Mallick's piece on Ford in today's star
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontomayoralrace/article/864045--mallick-waking-up-with-mayor-rob-ford
disturbing and fatphobic, and only turned people against the anti-ford leftist crowds.
some members of the downtown urban leftist intellectual crowds need to learn some manners, people in scarborough do not really like having anyone really being called as a fat pig and ignorant and stupid.

Cueball Cueball's picture

ETA, Mallick is a well known idiot. She should be ignored. I do. Doesn't everyone? I always thought the Star hired her because she was the perfect pastiche of a "lefty" moron. Don't be surprised if she endorses Thompson because Thompson mentions Jane Jacobs every oppotunity she gets.

Lord Palmerston

Lord Palmerston

Is Heather Mallick an "agent provocateur" working for the Ford campaign?  She is practically a caricature of the "downtown media and intellectual elite/gliteratti" looking down on working class and lower middle class homeowners in Etobicoke, Downsview and Scarborough.  Every time she writes a column about Ford, his support probably goes up!

brashley46 brashley46's picture

I'll probably end up voting for Joe, but unti he renounces his own actions in helping paint CUPE into a corner and votig to commend Chief bLiar for repressing our civil liberties during G20, I refuse to lift a hand to campaign for him. I have no candidate for Mayor.

Cueball Cueball's picture

Good points.

trippie

You're wasting your time on this bourgeois politicians.

What has Joe ever done for the working class?

Can anyone post a link to his quotes on abolishing the Capitalist system?

Your time would be better spent running your own working class candidate.

At least then you will learn what needs to be done.

trippie

You want to help the City of Toronto?

Replace all the Union leadership.

Any Mayor will be spending their time trying to please everyone at the same time.

Since most people at this forum are pro pressure and reform. Then the best form of pressure would be to mobilize the working class into action.

You want great transit. Have all the Unions shut the city down. And I don't mean the City Unions. I mean all the Unions. Across the province and country.

trippie

Look, get used to Ford and people like him.

As capitalism keeps coming up short and the bourgeois politicians keep chasing it's tail, the city will sink further into the abyss.

People like Ford are just the reactionary out come of this course.

Looking at Ford you will see a man that can't even make the proper dietary decisions. He can't even control his thoughts and comes up with never ending bigoted remarks. How is he going to manage a city?

That's not the point, the point is, he is the outward expression of society. This is the guy people are turning to.

My only conclusion is that the working class has no direction. All the people acting as the leaders of the working class, have failed.

Just look at the two main strikes over the last few years. One at the TTC and one by the city workers. In both cases the bourgeoisie and their media outlets were able to bash the workers unopposed. Why? Were were their representatives?

Ford won a long time ago.

radiorahim radiorahim's picture

trippie wrote:
. People like Ford are just the reactionary out come of this course. Looking at Ford you will see a man that can't even make the proper dietary decisions. He can't even control his thoughts and comes up with never ending bigoted remarks. .

Speaking of bigotted remarks, how about your own fat-phobia?

 

radiorahim radiorahim's picture

Cueball wrote:

ETA, Mallick is a well known idiot. She should be ignored. I do. Doesn't everyone? I always thought the Star hired her because she was the perfect pastiche of a "lefty" moron. Don't be surprised if she endorses Thompson because Thompson mentions Jane Jacobs every oppotunity she gets.

Mallick isn't much of a lefty.   A leftover perhaps but definitely not a lefty.   She doesn't like ATU 113 president Bob Kinnear's hairstyle???    Gimme a break!!!

 

Cueball Cueball's picture

Well, I like Kinnear's hairstyle myself. Gives me that Jimmy Hoffa feeling. Mind you, that might be what turns Mallick off. Heh.

writer writer's picture

Quote:
[url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/city-votes/three-to... Toronto mayoral candidates balk at early release of donors list[/url]

In a race dominated by the themes of financial accountability and transparency at city hall, three of the leading contenders for the mayor's chain are refusing to reveal before voting day who is funding their campaigns.

George Smitherman, Rocco Rossi and Sara Thomson intend to keep their donor lists secret until the law... requires them to disclose the names more than five months after election day ...

... the Joe Pantalone and Rob Ford campaigns are the only ones planning to release their lists early so voters can follow the money.

However, Mr. Ford doesn't appear to have given the issue much thought.

Stockholm

writer wrote:

 

However, Mr. Ford doesn't appear to have given the issue much thought.

There is not much news in this. From what i can tell Ford has never given any issue much thought!

writer writer's picture

The main point, I believe, is that Pantalone is the only candidate other than Ford willing to release the names of donors before the election. For all the bashing of current municipally elected representatives that they do, Rossi, Smitherman and Thomson aren't willing to practice what they preach when it comes to transparency.

Only the two candidates who have experience at city hall are prepared to be open *before* the people vote. One candidate is progressive, with a nuanced understanding of the city, of politics, and of finances. The other is extremely reactionary, simplistic, destructive. Rather than being Pantalone's "baby", as Rossi would have it, Ford is son of Harris. The rest, despite their objections otherwise, have positioned themselves as Harrisite wannabes. Wannabes who don't want us to know where they are getting their money when we go to the polls.

I think it would be smart for those who want Pantalone's support to increase to compare and contrast with Ford, and address how a progressive approach and Transit City will address the issues and alienation of Scarborogh, Rexdale, North York ...

takeitslowly

if Joe didnt talk about how toronto is really a nice garden and needs little fixing, and instead realize the horrifying nightmare of sitting at a subway train that is barely moving from Kennedy station all the way throughout Bloor and Young, or the fact that the RT at Scarborough is literally dying before our very eyes and going down in flames, we might be able to relate to Joe better.

writer writer's picture

He's the only one supporting Transit City, which addresses those concerns. All of the others want to break away from what has been planned, approved, budgeted for and started. Voting for any one of them will mean more delays, more suffering.

What you write simply underlines my point.

Olly

He's the only one supporting Transit City, which addresses those concerns. All of the others want to break away from what has been planned, approved, budgeted for and started. Voting for any one of them will mean more delays, more suffering.

 

I don't think it's clear that people in Etobicoke, Scarborough, etc want Transit City. In fact, I'm not sure how much support there is for Transit City in Toronto. Ford is promising subways. He'll never be able to deliver of course, but no one seems worried about that at the moment.

Polunatic2

Quote:
Your time would be better spent running your own working class candidate.

Nominations are closed unfortunately. Not an option this election. There is an option to support Pantalone the longshot. My suggestion is to help Joe and your favored local candidate by doubling up literature to drop in mailboxes. 

My simplistic view is that Ford was able to tap into the anti-elitist sentiment that angry people feel when they perceive things aren't going well. It's clear that much of the Toronto "elite" is backing Smitherman. Joe needs to distinguish himself from the "elite" and tap into the anger from a perspective that's the polar opposite of Ford's. 

Axing half the Councillors (how many did we lose with amalgamation?) is a direct attack on local democracy. It is not a cost saving measure. It's a dictatorial measure. Maybe Joe should stand up for local democracy too? Ford will succeed at reducing local democracy is he and Hudak are elected. The only contradiction is that Ford is lining up his councillors now. How many of them are stupid enough to support axing their jobs in order to get elected this time. 

Cueball Cueball's picture

Olly wrote:

I don't think it's clear that people in Etobicoke, Scarborough, etc want Transit City. In fact, I'm not sure how much support there is for Transit City in Toronto. Ford is promising subways. He'll never be able to deliver of course, but no one seems worried about that at the moment.

Transit is a key issue in civic politics. Knowing this, all candidates forward a transit plan in every city election as cornerstone of their platform. Indeed TTC service has been a key issue in the media for months. Your contention is that it is unclear that voters in Scarborough want a complete LRT servicing all of Scarborough, and instead might prefer a single line of LRT and replacment the existing scarborough LRT link with a subway?

How is replacing existing service a higher cost, as opposed to extending new service to new areas, at lower cost, an idea that appeals to people in Scarborough?

Cueball Cueball's picture

takeitslowly wrote:

if Joe didnt talk about how toronto is really a nice garden and needs little fixing, and instead realize the horrifying nightmare of sitting at a subway train that is barely moving from Kennedy station all the way throughout Bloor and Young, or the fact that the RT at Scarborough is literally dying before our very eyes and going down in flames, we might be able to relate to Joe better.

Fixing the Scarborough LRT and bringing it up to modern standards is part of Transit City.

writer writer's picture

Quote:

SPACING VOTES: Making the case for Pantalone

If possible, Smitherman has run an even worse campaign than Hall. Whereas in 2003 she said little and created no persona for herself other than entitled, Smitherman has crafted a shrill, bizarre image he is probably now stuck with.

Is Joe Pantalone the guy to offer the counter to Ford? He could be, should he find a way to energize an increasingly demoralized city. As an immigrant, he would represent at least a nod in the direction of the real face of Toronto. As a Council veteran, his record suggests the ability to run a pragmatic and functional team. As an environmentalist, he has a vision of a Toronto not defined solely by resentment over a vehicle registration tax. And he’s not a screamer, something I appreciate every time I see footage of Ford and Smitherman.

It’s a tough road for any candidate opposing Ford right now. But here’s another reminder from 2003: David Miller did not rise out of the teens in the polls until Thanksgiving. Right up until that point, the Hall campaign exerted constant pressure for him to fold, claiming that he was stealing “Barbara’s votes” and risking a John Tory mayoralty. We know how that turned out: Miller and Tory ignored her, waged high-energy campaigns with exciting debates, and they left her in the dust on election day.

Maybe we should put the 2003 comparisons to bed. This campaign is its own thing – and so far its tenor has been really corrosive. This is not the moment for anyone to drop out and concede defeat to a candidate whose sole message is “tear it down.” With five weeks to go, a frontrunner can fall a long way. Someone needs to take Rob Ford head on and clarify the choice Toronto must make. Get moving, people.

SimonP

There is still a ton of time left in this campaign. It's not just possible that the polls will change dramatically over the next weeks, but likely. Municipal elections are very fluid affairs. It's not just the 2003 Miller example. In 2006 in Ottawa, all through October Alex Munter had about 40% of the decided vote and was well in the lead of his two challengers, but he ended up losing to the guy who was at 6% in August.

I'm working on Joe's campaign, and have seen the underlying numbers. Rob Ford is still very beatable, and the only person who can do so is Joe Pantalone. It won't be easy, but if Joe gets enough volunteers and enough money it is possible.

To repeat Writer's call, if you have any time, please sign up at mayorjoe.ca . If you have any money, please donate. For anyone who doesn't know, the city has a very generous rebate program. For any donation up to $300, you are refunded 75%. So a $300 donation actually only costs you $75.

thorbeast

Joe Pantalone is the only credible candidate running for mayor.

Here are some links for more information about what he stands for and his experience:

Now Magazine: Here's Looking At Joe

Joe Pantalone for Mayor - Links

 

 

trippie

@radiorahim post #20:

 

There's nothing bigoted about my remark. The guys fat. Meaning that in all likely hood his eating habits are out of control. That may not matter to you but to me it shows a person that manages his stress in a negative way.

 

You think one thing in the guys life doesn't relate to other things? How about the guy take a serious look at himself.

 

He's fat, prone to addictive substances, says bigoted remarks, has reactionary right winged tendencies, will not compromise with others, and the list goes on. Yet people think this guy can lead the City of Toronto. What's that say about the whole situation?

 

Heres the prediction . Unless the guy takes a serious look at himself and start to fix his own life, the following will happen, if he becomes mayor of Toronto.

 

The stress of the job will become a burden. He will turn to his vices to over come his problems. He will make bad decisions and become very confrontational with others. He will blame everyone else. Toronto will suffer.

 

Personally the guy should take care of himself. This is just going to make his situation worse and make us worse at the same time. The people voting for him are blinded by there own ignorance.

This is not a good time for Toronto. Capitalism is in the shitters and people are looking for direction. The left parties have abandoned their Socialism and confidence in it a long time ago. Conservatives are confident in themselves and their ideology. As people look for answers the conservatives will sound appealing.

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

trippie, c'mon dude.  You've nailed a lot about Ford but you've got to reconsider your choice of words and execution.  It's unbecoming.

Cueball Cueball's picture

trippie wrote:

@radiorahim post #20:

 

There's nothing bigoted about my remark. The guys fat. Meaning that in all likely hood his eating habits are out of control. That may not matter to you but to me it shows a person that manages his stress in a negative way.

 

You think one thing in the guys life doesn't relate to other things? How about the guy take a serious look at himself.

 

He's fat, prone to addictive substances, says bigoted remarks, has reactionary right winged tendencies, will not compromise with others, and the list goes on. Yet people think this guy can lead the City of Toronto. What's that say about the whole situation?

 

Heres the prediction . Unless the guy takes a serious look at himself and start to fix his own life, the following will happen, if he becomes mayor of Toronto.

 

The stress of the job will become a burden. He will turn to his vices to over come his problems. He will make bad decisions and become very confrontational with others. He will blame everyone else. Toronto will suffer.

 

Personally the guy should take care of himself. This is just going to make his situation worse and make us worse at the same time. The people voting for him are blinded by there own ignorance.

This is not a good time for Toronto. Capitalism is in the shitters and people are looking for direction. The left parties have abandoned their Socialism and confidence in it a long time ago. Conservatives are confident in themselves and their ideology. As people look for answers the conservatives will sound appealing.

"Direction and leadership" does not mean calling people "fatso".

For one thing, it is a mistaken belief that all people who are overweight are so because they overeat. Some, indeed, have different metabolism, and others have genuine disorders. Indeed, why am I reminded of a discussion with John Tory on 680 News, where some people were discussing charging people extra for health care costs associated with being over weight... judged by the pound.

There are a whole lot other things to talk about Ford, as opposed to bringing up his weight. If that is the best you can do for confident "leadership" from the left, the left is truly dead. Sounds like CPC (ML) bunko to me.

writer writer's picture
Stockholm

trippie wrote:

 The guys fat. Meaning that in all likely hood his eating habits are out of control. That may not matter to you but to me it shows a person that manages his stress in a negative way.

or, maybe he has a "glandular problem" or his metabolism is out of kilter and he actually doesn't eat all that much. But then again the comedian Lenny Bruce once said "Whenever you see an enormously fat person, they always say that it wasn't because of overeating - they just have a "glandular problem". If that's true why is that when the allies liberated Buchenwald - you never saw any morbidly obese prisoners walking out saying 'all I ate was bread and water for four years'".

I agree though that we are going wayyy off message by talking about Ford's weight. There are plenty of politicians on the left who could lose a pound or two as well (are you there Howard Moscoe?)

writer writer's picture

It's really unfortunate that a discussion about a progressive, inclusive  candidate is being marred by such knee-jerk lookist hate. Could we stop with the fat phobia?

Maysie Maysie's picture

Moderator hat on.

What writer said.

trippie your choice of words, and your feeble "defence" of them in post #35 are deplorable. Stop now or you will be given a few days off.

Ford's not suitable for mayor of Toronto for many reasons. There's a thread about Ford here. His weight and size are irrelevant.

This thread is called How do we mobilize support for Joe Pantalone? Let's talk about that.

Polunatic2

I'm starting to wonder if Ford isn't also campaigning for Tim Hudak at the same time he's running for Mayor. 

Quote:
 “I’m pretty confident Mr. McGuinty will give me the money,” said Mr. Ford. And if he doesn’t? “I’ll let Mr. McGuinty explain why we won’t get subways.” And how would that help, exactly?

While it's not part of the story at the NP, I heard Ford on the radio yesterday reminding everyone that there's a provincial election next year and that if McGuinty doesn't pay up, he'll have to face the voters. Sounds like a set up to me. Demand the impossible and then use it as a reason to campaign for the Hudak Cons in 2011. 

If 40% of the voters turn out to vote, and Ford wins with 30% in a 5-way split, he'll have a mandate from 15% of the electors - less than 10% of Toronto's population. Doesn't sound like a lot of clout to me. 

Go, Joe, Go! Put some Pants on the Mayor's office! 

Lord Palmerston

Horrible piece in the Star by Bob Hepburn today:

Quote:
Back in 2000, consumer advocate Ralph Nader was the Green party’s nominee for U.S. president, running against Al Gore for the Democrats and George Bush for the Republicans.

Despite pleas from friends to withdraw because his no-hope candidacy could hurt Gore’s chances of beating Bush, Nader campaigned tirelessly.

In the battleground state of Florida, Nader received 97,488 votes — and the undying anger of Democrats who claimed his bid drained votes from Gore, who lost Florida by just 537 votes to Bush.

That narrow and controversial victory in Florida secured the U.S. presidency for Bush.

We all know what happened next — Bush went on to become the worst U.S. president ever.

That same election scenario is taking place right now in Toronto.

Here, a trio of candidates with no chance of winning the Oct. 25 mayoral race may contribute heavily to the election of Rob Ford, whom the candidates themselves claim would be “scary” and a disaster for Toronto if he wins.

Because of that, Joe Pantalone, Rocco Rossi and Sarah Thomson should withdraw immediately and let Ford and George Smitherman, the two clear front-runners, fight it out by themselves in the last month of the election.

If they refuse to end their ego-fuelled campaigns, which is most probable, then these also-ran candidates would be partly to blame for helping Ford become mayor if he beats Smitherman.

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/865079--hepburn-...

 

writer writer's picture

Some of the coverage from yesterday's policy announcement:

Quote:
Pantalone noted he’s the only candidate, other than Rob Ford, to have recently experienced an increase in support in public opinion polls. The latest survey put Ford ahead with 45.8 per cent support from decided voters. Pantalone gained a few points, up to 16.8 per cent support.

At a press conference held in the pedestrian zone at Gould and Victoria Streets on the Ryerson campus Wednesday morning, Pantalone vowed to build on and expand the city’s green initiatives, which includes ensuring all new structures built in the city meet the highest green standards. He also promised to keep Toronto Hydro in public hands.

[url=http://www.mayorjoe.ca/2010/09/23/toronto-media-responds-to-joes-plan-fo... Media Responds to Joe’s Plan for Greener Prosperity and a Pedestrian Mall on Yonge[/url]

Hey, an obvious way to mobilize support for Joe is to comment on news items about the campaign, and speak up for what Joe has to offer.

N.R.KISSED

START TO CHANT

 

GIVE PANTS A CHANCE!!!

Aristotleded24

Olly wrote:
I don't think it's clear that people in Etobicoke, Scarborough, etc want Transit City. In fact, I'm not sure how much support there is for Transit City in Toronto. Ford is promising subways. He'll never be able to deliver of course, but no one seems worried about that at the moment.

I don't think it's so much a matter of not wanting as a matter of it simply not being on the radar of people living in the suburbs. Theoretically Transit City will address many of the transit issues at some point in the future. For all practical purposes, there is nothing happening right now, so it just doesn't figure highly on people's minds. I think that once the lines start servicing the suburban areas, then people will start catching on and supporting the program.

We're in a similar situation in Winnipeg trying to win over support for our up-and-coming rapid transit system.

takeitslowly

my frustration with Joe is once again he is always claiming that the city is wonderful and working fine, he doesnt seem to acknowledge and affirm the frustration and problems people face in all parts of the city..its about a lack of empathy and the preception that he is emotionally out of touch and downtown centric, regardless of the actual policies.

adma

Wondering what effect this would have... 

http://torontoist.com/2010/09/duly_quoted_joe_pantalone_1.php

nussy

None. 

Cueball Cueball's picture

takeitslowly wrote:

my frustration with Joe is once again he is always claiming that the city is wonderful and working fine, he doesnt seem to acknowledge and affirm the frustration and problems people face in all parts of the city..its about a lack of empathy and the preception that he is emotionally out of touch and downtown centric, regardless of the actual policies.

What is downtown centric about helping develop and champion a transit plan that only expands transit in suburbs, Scarborough, Finch, and so on? Perceptions should be guided by reality. In reality the perception is spawned by the fact that successive adminstrations at higher level of government have reneged and changed plans and downloaded services on the city, while denying the city the right to create progressive taxes so that it can do its own planning.

For example, the Malvern extension of the Transit City plan was revoked by the Provincial government because it wanted to chop 4 billion from the Transit City budget. Interstingly, this 4 billion is precisely the amount that McGuinty is handing over to the corporate sector in terms of his new tax reduction for corporate profits. An interesting parrallel in that 4 billion figure.

No doubt people are frustrated, but the energy of that anger is entirely misdirected at city hall.

Pages

Topic locked