"Capitalism is the absolute ENEMY of the free market" (David Korten)

15 posts / 0 new
Last post
Brian White
"Capitalism is the absolute ENEMY of the free market" (David Korten)

I actually read this interview about 4 days ago in the print edition in a local cafe and I was going to try explain it. (Some hope!)  But all is well because it is online too.  Basically he says that capitalism is the mortal enemy of the free market because the ultimate goal in capitalism is to destroy the market and have monopoly profits.  He does it in a wonderfully clear way.

Worth reading to see if some of those who worship the holy free market can have their religion tweaked and get them to recognise the threat that unrestrained capitalism is posing to the holy free market, to the economy and to democracy itself.

"What is your response to people who say that capitalism, freedom, and democracy are inseparable? That it’s all part and parcel?"

David: "It’s a total lie".

You can see more at http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/a-resilient-community/get-free-from-wa...

Doug

Straight from the pen of Adam Smith, really.

Brian White

Not really.  I was hoping some of the left wingers would be interested in using this in their "spin"  at this time of doubt.  Some people have had their belief in the "system" shattered. 

But nobody has properly told them "why" it all went sideways. So they may drift back to supporting the system as is and voting as is too.

If you can have a simple explanation similar to Kortens, you might be able to gently pry  them off the brainwash train. 

You can bet that the corperate spin doctors have gospel 2,3,4 etc already written. But I think the left wing people think that stuff that is self evident to them is self evident to the average joe and jane.

I bet you are wrong and the voting figures for partys like the NDP support my view.

I think you need "truths" written in something like Kortens style before you have any hope of beating  the fraser institute people in the battle for the minds of the public.

 

Fidel

I agree with his comment that capitalism and democracy are incompatible.

Quote:
I grew up very conservative, even fairly right-wing. The reason I pursued a career in international development was my concern about a communist takeover of the world, and how that threatened our American way of life. I am most definitely not a Marxist.

The Sovs were never a threat. They were not interested in world dominance. The USSR was basically a group of developing countries trying to exist within a capitalist world. The TNCs worked with fascist governments to effect decades long embargoes and sanctions. Shortages of all kinds combined with western propaganda made people living in those countries believe that Soviet communism was a miserable system. They understood that everyone living here in the west were millionaires. In short, people were lied to constantly during the cold war era. Things were not as they seemed to be. And it's still true today.

Adolf Hitler was the biggest liar of the last century. Fascism central moved from Western Europe to North America where its practitioners  became the biggest liars of the second half of the last century through today.

Brian White

I was hoping people would stick to the capitalism as the enemy of the free market and try to solidify a message to the masses.  (The he grew up very conservative, etc  was just trying to get his audience to identify with him as far as i can see). 

No point in preaching to the converted, Korten is going after loyal republicans.

Same with you guys. You should frame your message for the conservatives and try to convert them.  Maybe that is over people's heads?

Anyway, I see this thread floating away into strange irrelevant places.  So be it, I guess.  Communism was extinct last time I looked. Lets forget about it and try make corporate capitalism extinct too.

Doug Woodard

Brian White wrote:

  Communism was extinct last time I looked. 

Communism is alive and well and living on the Canadian and American prairies. See the Hutterites (They go to considerable lengths to avoid large scale and bureaucratic organization).

The Federation of Egalitarian Communities is surviving in the U.S. too, see

http://www.twinoaks.org  for example.

Marxist-Lenist state socialism is in bad shape. But just because the Marxist-Leninists, and Marx before them, appropriated the name of "communism" doesn't mean that we have to accept them at their own valuation.

Not that I think that pure communism is a the best way to organize a complete economy, especially an industrial one. However I agree with Confucius who said that the first step to correct thought was the accurate use of words.

Doug Woodard, St. Catharines, Ontario

Brian White

"However I agree with Confucius who said that the first step to correct thought was the accurate use of words". Conuscius did not have to deal with a right wing controlled mass media which appropriated words and destroyed their meaning.  I think people on the left have to be nimble and quick and invent new words to replace the destroyed ones. New words are being made all the time.  I have a little part to play in the "windofarms" project.  That is a mass collaberation of people who grow food hydroponically on their windows. If a girl in Boston can make up a new word and take it worldwide in a couple of years, I think you can too.  Come to think of it, I made up the name "pulser pump".

So you just got to think outside the dictionary.  When I stayed in Norway one summer,  communities were called communes. So the ODDA commune was really rich. Because they had hydropower and in norway the local community where it is produced OWNS a large part of the price of electricity.  This is the type of policy that the BC NDP should be supporting.  A diametric opposite of what Gordon Campbell does but very appealing to voters in rural areas.

Fidel

Brian White wrote:
Anyway, I see this thread floating away into strange irrelevant places.  So be it, I guess.  Communism was extinct last time I looked. Lets forget about it and try make corporate capitalism extinct too.

I think I know what you're saying. But let's remember that communism is a relatively new idea compared to how long capitalism has been around and failing in experiments around the world since 14th century Italy.

The main difference is that one idea tends to collapse all on its own, while the other has become extinct because it is the will of the state increasingly controlled by capitalists.

If we were to describe the two ideas in general, we would have to conclude that one of them exists only because of the full force of the state and even the military while the other came into being in Asia after it was the will of the people to overthrow corrupt imperialist regimes friendly to capitalists at the time. One system is very artificial and unnatural while the other continues to be an idealism in the minds of millions of people. Capitalists and their hirelings in government have tried to murder this idea at various times through the last century. It still remains to be seen whether an idea may be killed. I think they've come close. But imho,  communism will never die a natural death the way capitalism tends toward and yet is continually propped up by full force of the state controlled by a relatively small handful of capitalists as always.

radiorahim radiorahim's picture

To get back on to the topic in the opening post, about how capitalism is incompatible with the free market, there's one glaring example that all can see.

How many posters in this thread are running an operating system on their PC that isn't called "Microsoft Windows"?

Microsoft's total domination of operating system software on desktop and laptop computers isn't an accident...or because they have "the best" operating system, it's because of the deals they made with PC manufacturers going right back to the 1990's that gave them a defacto "private tax" on computing.    Walk into any major computer retailer and try to find a PC that doesn't have Microsoft Windows pre-installed on it.   And even though you might not want Microsoft Windows on your PC, and even though the software license says that you are entitled to a refund if you don't use it, try to get that refund.

Microsoft dominates in office suite software by totally controlling the file formats like .doc for word processing, .xls for spreadsheets, .ppt for presentations and so on.     Because Microsoft is the only company that has the complete documentation on how these file formats work, it's impossible for any other software developer to completely 100% reproduce documents in these file formats.   Many software programmes do a pretty damned good job of it...say 90-95%...but can't do it 100% of the time.

When a non-technical person tries to open a Microsoft formatted document using non-Microsoft software and something doesn't quite work, they assume that the reason is that the competing software is "no good"...and go back to using M$ Office.

The reality of the situation is that Microsoft fought tooth and nail against the adoption of the OASIS "Open Document Format" as a non-proprietary, non vendor specific file format for office documents when the issue came before ISO (International Standards Organization).

If everyone was using ODF file formats instead of Microsoft formats, then there could indeed be competition between various vendors of office productivity software.   Software vendors would be competing on the basis of features and price (which in many cases is a price of $0.00).    Instead, we have vendor lock-in and monopoly control.

In both cases it's the free software community which gives the end user choices...where there is a "free market" if you will.

In the case of desktop/laptop computer operating systems you have over 200 different variants of the GNU/Linux operating system to choose from...and a number of different variants of the Free BSD Unix operating system.

It's also free software that gives you choices when it comes to office productivity software.    You can choose from Open Office...which is now being forked into the more open and more community controlled "Libre Office", there's IBM's Lotus Symphony, Gnome Office, KOffice and Abiword for word processing and Gnumeric for spreadsheets...along with others I'm probably forgetting about.

Most sectors of the economy are controlled by monopolies and/or oligopolies.   These corporations go out of their way to prevent a genuine free market.

siamdave

Far too many people are far too trusting when listening to capitalists and their well-trained propagandists. They assume the capitalists-etc use words the same way we do. When we say 'free market', we kind of assume a certain set of rules that ensures everyone plays nicely, children. The capitalist however means no such thing - when the capitalist says 'free market', they mean an absence of rules - 'freedom!!' - in which the strong and ruthless are allowed to dominate the weak or otherwise unable-to-stand-up-to-a-serious-predator types. The only 'rules' the capitalist wants are rules that they can use to justify their keeping of whatever they manage to acquire through their freedom to dominate others. Too many people allow them to get away with this - that is, they create rules to justify their theft, and the weak-minded 'liberals' accept the laws of capitalist-controlled governments, and the following  judgements of "impartial" courts that justify their theft. And etc.

To paraphrase some old phrase - there is a time to follow democratic laws, and a time to oppose unjust laws - and the main thing we need is the wisdom to understand the difference. The capitalists have been playing us for suckers for far too long - it's time to stand up and say NO MORE!

Brian White

radiorahim wrote:

To get back on to the topic in the opening post, about how capitalism is incompatible with the free market, there's one glaring example that all can see.

How many posters in this thread are running an operating system on their PC that isn't called "Microsoft Windows"?

Microsoft's total domination of operating system software on desktop and laptop computers isn't an accident...or because they have "the best" operating system, it's because of the deals they made with PC manufacturers going right back to the 1990's that gave them a defacto "private tax" on computing.    Walk into any major computer retailer and try to find a PC that doesn't have Microsoft Windows pre-installed on it.   And even though you might not want Microsoft Windows on your PC, and even though the software license says that you are entitled to a refund if you don't use it, try to get that refund.

 

Most sectors of the economy are controlled by monopolies and/or oligopolies.   These corporations go out of their way to prevent a genuine free market.

Monopolies or Oligopolies.  You have monsanto in herbicide and gmo plants who have extended a glyphosate monopoly to  seeds as well. I remember in Ireland when the change came in where a farmer could no longer legally store his barley for next years seed.  First it was "plant breeders rights"  so you would have to wait a few years before you were allowed to re seed. But then monsanto lobbied for gmo patents and got them.  Now you never buy seed anymore, you rent it. And if the pollen from a monsanto plant pollinates your plant, they own your seeds too.  This little trick has wiped out genetic diversity in crop plants in about 15 years. It has wiped out the free market in seed production and monsanto has used the glyphsate monopoly to gain a gmo monopoly which they are further extending by buying up competeing seed companies. They own much of the seed companies in the world.  This company has no respect for the natural world or natures rules.

Nature will strike back as it always does but it will be ordinary hungry people who will be stricken.

Bayer is doing the same thing as monsanto is doing with its next generation insecticides. A combination of monsanto gm bt plants and bayer nicotine similar insecticides are a very large part of the bee colony collapse disorder "mystery".  There is no mystery. The spin departments of both companies are working overtime to create diversions and pretend that their products are blameless.  In every sector of the economy capitalism strives  and succeeds to create this monopoly condition.

Brian

Fidel

As Marx might have said about it, all Microsoft employees will someday work for themselves and for the good all when workers takeover the factories... and software giants like MS. As long as they exist, they are there to be taken possession of by the working class.

So let them expand and even expand globally. Let them invest in new ideas and technologies. One day workers of the world will rise up and seize capitalist assets and the means of production. And then we will work to create the common good economy of the future.

Make a square viewing aperture with your thumbs and index fingers, hold it up to the world outside and look through it. Now imagine everything you see is freely accessible to all. That's the future.

George Victor

Quote: "So let them expand and even expand globally. Let them invest in new ideas and technologies. One day workers of the world will rise up and seize capitalist assets and the means of production. And then we will work to create the common good economy of the future."

 

"Capitalist assets and means of production" may by then be reduced to shovels and axes, Fidel. We will indeed be forced to work when our investments in the modern corporation no longer maintain us in our old age. Meanwhile, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board continues to sink more money into New York real estate.

Fidel

Yeah maybe you're right. I don't think it will do workers much good to takeover some hedge funds and real estate at over-inflated values in future.

We need real infrastructure of the future. Dilapidated bridges, roads, old buildings and water works aren't much good to us if they are falling apart. We have to demand that they invest in people and the things that are sustainable.

George Victor

Yes,  our ever watchful citizenry have continued to buy the Conservative pitch of lower taxes, as the infrastructure goes - literally - down the drain.  And of course, the Conservative solution for the finally impossible debt situation is to privatize the former public institutions.

Business-page readers this morning learned that even Jack Mintz, head of the School of Policy Studies at the University of Calgary, Canadian capitalism's sanctum sanctorum, now endorses a "big CPP", unable to see private-sector solutions alone as answers to the impoverishment of workers at the end of their working life. The definedo-banefit plan is not sustainable for most companies, who are switching to defined-contribution plans ...workers and employees sharing the risk of failing markets at pension time.

Old Age Securityand and the Guaranteed Income Supplement do not keep one from the food bank .  Provincial and federal officials are now in talks "about how to expand the CPP in a gradual and modest way...the debate for now is focused on what 'modest' means, reports the Canadian Press.

"But Alberta is not on side, and Quebec is sitting on the fence, and Jonathan Kesselman, an expert on pension funding at Simon Fraser University, hopes they "don't dither too long,or opt for 'baby steps' to appease critics of higher premiums. He warned that a big CPP would take several years to implement and 40 years before the benefits are fully felt,and says governments should take advantage of the momentum they have now to make significant changes."