British Universities Warned to Expect £4.2 Billion Cuts

103 posts / 0 new
Last post
Catchfire Catchfire's picture
British Universities Warned to Expect £4.2 Billion Cuts

Yes, you read that right. That's Billion.

Quote:
Universities in England are being warned to expect an 80% cut to their teaching budgets in next week's government spending review. Professor Steve Smith, president of the vice-chancellors' group Universities UK, has emailed all higher education institutions alerting them to a likely £4.2bn cut to teaching and a £1bn reduction in research budgets.

Lord Browne's review of university funding, published this week, states that it envisages the teaching budget dropping to £700m per year. All but medicine, science, engineering and modern languages degrees could stop receiving state subsidies, it said.

Universities will have to charge about £7,000 per year in fees "to maintain investment at current levels," the report said.

I'm so utterly shell shocked by this announcement, I can't actually form cogent thought. This article, by Martin McQuillan, approaches the horror, loss, and gut-wrenching disgust roiling through my body since I heard this...

If you tolerate this...

Quote:

The pithily entitled ‘Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance’ was published on Tuesday. In short, for those not parochial enough to be concerned by this, it was a committee set up by the previous Labour government, chaired by ex-BP boss John Browne (as one of the many sinecures offered to him, including Chair of the Tate Trustees, in compensation for the homophobia that chased him out of the oil industry, otherwise it would have been him and not Tony Hayward taking the rap for the Deepwater Horizon disaster) charged with considering future funding arrangements for universities and their students in England. The headlines from the report are that 1. The current cap of £3,290 on student tuition fees should be scrapped in favour of potentially unlimited fees set by universities themselves, 2. The current teaching grant distributed to English universities should be cut by £3.2billion with a 100% reduction for the arts, humanities and social sciences. In effect Browne’s committee (which included the Chief Executive of Standard Chartered PLC, the Head of McKinsey, and two Vice-Chancellors) has at a stroke privatised the arts and humanities in England. The committee recommends that the state should no longer have any investment in these areas and that private individuals who wish to pursue such things at their own cost should pay for them.

It is hard to know where to begin with this. There are no workarounds, no accommodations to be made, no temporary crisis to be endured; this is the nuclear option, total and irreversible wipeout. Now, there is a difference between the publication of a so-called ‘Independent’ Review (Browne has now moved on to his next job advising the coalition government on Whitehall job cuts, and his review has clearly been hijacked to feed the ideological attack on the state currently being pursued by an administration that no one voted for) and how it translates into legislation through the torturous process of what Washington would call ‘the pork barrel politics’ of buying off a Lib Dem back bench revolt. However, there would seem to be little to be hoped for in this regard. What is striking here is not that higher education (and the arts, humanities and social sciences in particular) have been targeted but that they have been the first thing to be attacked and in such a spectacularly ruthless manner. The calculation must be that the news agenda will have moved on next week when everyone is more concerned by the fate of ‘useful things’ like hospitals and fire stations in the Comprehensive Spending Review. And of course, if the ConDems cannot be bothered to fund humanities teaching any more there is very little prospect that they will continue to fund humanities research. ‘The future has been cancelled’, as Graham Allen, writing in the context of Irish cuts, put it recently.

Most people will blame the Conservatives; the Conservatives will hope that most people will blame the LibDems. I do not blame either; I expect nothing else from the guardians of class privilege and their unscrupulous carpet-bagging associates. The people who are to blame for this are the Vice-Chancellors of UK universities (with one honourable exception) who have consistently pressed for an increase in tuition fees in order to maximise the return to their institutions.

Oh, and the Liberal Democrats are part of the governing coalition. Presumably without their spines.

Bacchus

And this from a committee set up and staffed by the previous labor government?

siamdave

Explained here, for those ready to get out of capitalist cloudcuckooland and back to reality - http://rabble.ca/babble/canadian-politics/they-call-it-austerity-i-call-... . I find it completely incomprehensible how so many people let this brazen scam go on right in front of them, when the damage is so massive and widespread ...

Snert Snert's picture

Quote:

Yes, you read that right. That's Billion.

British billion (a million million) or American (a thousand million)?

remind remind's picture

Sealed

Caissa

Undecided

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

All English-speaking nations use the same billion, if that was a serious question up there. At any rate, it's a massive cut. A massive, demoralizing cut.

Caissa
Catchfire Catchfire's picture

No, he's not. It's the same billion.

Click!

Anyway, how about those cuts!

Caissa

He is correct in the sense that historically the term billion has been used differently in the UK and the rest of the world. Anyway this is thread drift. Another attempt to corporatize a societal good. How strong is NUS these days?

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Well, they have a nationally coordinated day of action on November 10. So we'll see how strong they are.

They've asked the government to "rethink" the Browne Report. I'd rather see outright rejection.

500_Apples

They've cut a lot of funding to the sciences as well. You see much shallower cuts to the sciences suggested in this particular story, but Britain has actually been cutting the physical sciences quite significantly in the past few years, not in reports but in reality. This is supposedly part of a move towards "applied science" which makes very little sense as a policy.

I think this is horrible news for the UK, but in light of recent developments in the UK I'm not surprised. We often speak of higher education as a right on this website, but it's also a privilege, and the UK is going bankrupt. It's even more dependent on the financial sector and on US imperialism then the US itself, and we're going to see even more in cuts. They'll cut public schools as well, welfare, the national health service, et cetera. I doubt the UK will remain a first-world country. They're even cutting funding to their military, frat boy Cameron just announced a cut of 8% over the next four years, which sounds more official than "The Browne Report".

That said I do think there is some ignorant anti-humanities bias. I thought it was ironic that he was chased out of the oil and gas industry due to homophobia -- if that's true of course, I'm somewhat skeptical. If it's true, he's exactly the sort of person who might benefit from a society where people have a broader understanding of culture and history and a better capability to question their leaders. I do feel some Schadenfreude at what will come next however. I think the ruling classes in both the UK and North America have been targetting the humanities for several decades because it is the source of a modicum of opposition, everything from student movements to conciousness of gender studies. They do not want criticism. They want an echo chamber, a more perfect echo chamber than the one they already have, and they're well on their way. That can only lead to the ruin of society and thus the ruin of those at the economic apex of said society.

Sean in Ottawa

Also massive cuts to the poorest, those on social assistance and also to health care.

Can only imagine Harper wondering if a Con government that is a minority propped up by Liberals in the UK can do it so can a Con government here also propped up by Liberals.

Of course this is exactly what Bernier proposed-- since these things-- education, social assistance and health are all from the health and social transfers are exactly what would be cut if Bernier got his way.

Perhaps Bernier is the trial balloon sanctioned by Harper-- if it flies then we could be facing this here. And gutless federal governments don't have a tradition of swinging the axe in Canada-- they just slash payments to provinces and let them do it, claiming to be somehow imaginative, progressive and good at management. Just ask Paul Martin. Bernier's proposal is a more extreme version of exactly what Martin did (that he partly reversed as PM).

For the Brits though this is especially devastating because the announcement alone of such a draconian direction has already broken confidence in their economy with a number of people already saying a second deep dip recession is unavoidable once the government takes this much money out of the economy. And it is not entirely true that the government has to fare badly in recession. If you do not care for the suffering of people and slash and burn ever deeper, the government can improve its books even as the economy tanks. (Just as Maggie Thatcher.) Of course the victim is not only social justice but the longer term viability of the nation's economy.

Anyway, for the curious this answers the question of whether this was a new Conservative party or the same old, same old. Looks like it is indeed the same old heartless beast the Brits tossed out and a new generation will have to suffer before this one goes in the dustbin.

siamdave

I am a bit puzzled. There's lots of comments on how terrible this is, and on how it could be heading our way - but not a word on this - http://rabble.ca/babble/canadian-politics/they-call-it-austerity-i-call-... - which gives a short explanation of why all this austerity stuff is just a huge fraud and theft. If you think I'm a nutcase, please feel free to say so, I won't get all frothy and start screaming - but it seems pretty clear to me, and I've explained what I think is happening in enough detail that anybody can at least evaluate the credibility of my 'theory' . Or is it all just too horrendous to contemplate, if true?

I am afraid that I just don't get it - I see the greatest crime in history going on right in front of us - the theft of our entire modern democratic world and the imposition of a new feudalism on completely deniable grounds - and nobody seems to care. The only thing that comes to mind is one of my old standbys, TS Eliot - this is the way the world ends - not with a bang but a whimper.

 

Merowe

(more drift) May I chime in here that historically the British billion I grew up with was a million million. This did lead to confusion in my adolescence. And what about a 'crore'? (end more drift)

Sean in Ottawa

I think people are interested in this- I sense you are unhappy that people did not respond as much to your post in the other thread. I can understand this as at times a lot of effort goes in and sometimes it strikes a chord and people respond and sometimes it doesn't.

The reasons are not just subject matter-- at times it is what else is going on (if people are preoccupied by other popular threads)-- even the number of threads going at the moment. I did not even see your thread till you posted it here. It is a good idea when something is related in another thread to do what you did and say -- hey here is something relevant over here to this discussion.

The other thing in this case is people may take as a given what you are raising and not feel the need to comment further. That capitalists take every opportunity to rob the public may be a grand conspiracy and revelation to some and a basic truism to others who feel no further comment is needed.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Humanities to lose English universities teaching grant

Quote:
Teaching grants for degree courses in arts, humanities and social sciences at England's universities are likely to be phased out under government plans.

Giving evidence to MPs, Universities Minister David Willetts suggested these courses would be funded wholly via tuition fees in future.

But he said the greater share of cuts would come after fees went up in 2012.

Under the Browne Review, tuition fees replace teaching grants in all but science and maths subjects.

Lord Browne's review suggested the cap on fees should be lifted and students should be charged unlimited fees.

Sean in Ottawa

Such a move means two things:

1) This is a form of privatization and the state will effectively have no sway over the universities in any respect

2) Britain will return to the days when only the wealthy "classes" would be able to get an education

The long term impact on the UK will be devastating socially and economically.

I hate to think what Harper will take from this.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Spot on, Sean. Who wants to live in a country where only the rich get to go to be educated? I thought fading empires were supposed to glean a shred of humility and perspective (cf. Sweden). It does not give me hope for the battles we are fighting on home soil.

500_Apples

Maybe it's just a plan to subsidize the banks. The American tuition system is to have the government subsidize the banks through a framework called "student loans", in which young people are the collateral and the federal government funds higher education.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Ha. Nice one, Apples. Shift the debt from the public purse to student loans. Get 'em young. It worked for McDonald's, baby formula and cigarettes, right?

500_Apples

Catchfire wrote:

Ha. Nice one, Apples. Shift the debt from the public purse to student loans. Get 'em young. It worked for McDonald's, baby formula and cigarettes, right?

A hundred and ten years ago, the British ruling classes got worried because their solders were not as tall and big as the soldiers of some other countries.

King Leopold was once advised to better the treatment of Congolese workers, because otherwise he would no longer have any Congolese workers to send him gold.

The kind of Nobless Oblige that would lead to that kind of thinking is no longer fashionable.

Caissa

London, England (CNN) -- A group of demonstrators broke into the headquarters of Britain's governing Conservative party in London Wednesday, spray-painting anarchy symbols and setting off flares before being forced out of the building.

They went on to set fires outside the building.

The violence came during a largely peaceful protest by students against government plans to allow universities to increase tuition fees. The National Union of Students said 40,000 demonstrators were on the streets.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/11/10/uk.protest/index.html?hpt=T2

 

There have been clashes between demonstrators and police in London, as students and lecturers protest against plans to treble tuition fees and cut university funding in England.

Protesters have broken into the building housing the Conservative Party headquarters in Westminster.

They have set fire to placards outside.

Student leaders condemned the latest action. They say about 30,000 people took part in a march earlier.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11726822

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Fight every cut.

Stargazer

Clearly working nicely with the government is not working. One bit. So if not out right violent protests then what? Writing letters that no one reads and no one cares to do anything about? Demonstrating? That clearly isn't working. It isn't a failure of the left that is to blame, it is that the right is much much much more powerful, has all the fancy weapons and the means of control (media).

 

At some point there will be mass revolution, and given the capitalists hold on dominant discourse, ideology and well, everything else, it is not going to be pretty.

I don't know what the final tipping point is going to be, but it is going to come.

 

 

Evening Star

Jesus.  What do you think the chances are of this happening here if it could happen in the UK?  I trembled a little when our Cons said they'd pay off the massive deficit with spending cuts.  And WTF, Liberal Democrats?  WTF are they even getting out of this coalition?

Evening Star

Seriously, a country with some of the world's best schools won't stand for this, will they?

Caissa

Canada's national student movement is divided. NUS, I believe, is far stronger.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Yes, but these are "shock & awe" style cuts, and they are across the board. Some will surely be fought and even stopped, but all of them? It doesn't look good for students (or the poor, or health workers, or unions, etc. etc.)

 

Snert Snert's picture

Quote:
Clearly working nicely with the government is not working. One bit. So if not out right violent protests then what?
 

It's been about three weeks since the government announced their intent to deregulate tuition. 

I guess if less destructive means haven't reversed a huge government budgetary initiative in 21 days, they never will. Bring on the flares!

That said, tripling tuition overnight is eating the seed corn.  How Britain figures this will make them more prosperous in the near or far future is beyond me.

ygtbk

The actual text of the Browne report is available here:

http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/corporate/docs/s/10-1208-securing-s...

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Snert wrote:
It's been about three weeks since the government announced their intent to deregulate tuition. 

I guess if less destructive means haven't reversed a huge government budgetary initiative in 21 days, they never will. Bring on the flares!

 

The students of England have recognized these cuts for what they are: an act of war on education. They have responded accordingly with righteous anger. There is nothing in any of the press releases or reports that suggests these ideological, backminded, and catastrophic cuts are negotiable. Indeed, the government did not bother to consult with students, faculty or university administration before they announced these cuts. The suggestion, or even inference, that 21 days is too short a period to respond to this unbridled act of aggression against students, is utterly detached from the real social situation. We should support these students to the hilt.

 

 

George Victor

ES: "WTF, Liberal Democrats?  WTF are they even getting out of this coalition?"

 

These are the folks who pledged during the election campaign to abolish fees.

 

Perhaps the question should be WHEN are they getting out of the coalition?

 

Time will prove their "flexibility." And maybe even their undoiing. Wink

Stargazer

Snert wrote:

How Britain figures this will make them more prosperous in the near or far future is beyond me.

 

No idea Snert, but it is perplexing. I don't know why Creationism is taught in PS in the states but it sure as hell isn't going to help anyone get a good science degree.

It appears this whole attack on education coming from the right (and the fake left) are all about ensuring people stay ignorant. They're calling for eliminating all of the Humanities and Arts.

Doug
Evening Star

!

Bacchus

Ahh nothing like double dealing at its best

edmundoconnor

As someone who was among the last cohort of tuition-free UK students, I could see this coming, even in 1997. Tuition fees were the thin end of the wedge. Once in place, the principle was established. While the Tories/Lib Dems have delivered the coup de grace, Labour set this particular train in motion. I intend to remember that if and when I move back there.

A priceless quote:

Lord Browne said today that he did not expect students to be deterred by debt.

Words fail me. They really do. So he blithely thinks that working class students aren't going to scared off by a huge, huge debt? Not one? If even one person doesn't go to university who should have, let the guilt weigh heavily on his shoulders.

What a lovely place it will be. A nation of happy, compliant workers eager to do anything their bosses want. A nation of devil-take-the-hindmost. Ah, bliss.

It's important to note that Scotland has a different system in place.

As a native of that country, they mean thousand million. The million million thing has pretty much died, as that confused even us.

Doug
edmundoconnor

Dracula and blood banks, anyone?

laine lowe laine lowe's picture

Working and middle class students are held back by the thought of accumulating huge debts. They only have to look at Canada to see how that works. In fact, I would be curious to see what percentage of graduates from Canadian universities actually come from the working class.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture
Doug

It appears that British police have picked up the technique of kettling. I suppose this is becoming enough of a protest given that it now pays to bring a day's worth of food and toilet supplies with you when protesting.

thorin_bane

More superjails needed.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Nick Clegg to make plea to divided party on eve of tuition fees vote

Quote:
A Liberal Democrat grassroots revolt over the party leadership's support for trebling tuition fees emerged tonight as members of the party's policy committee demanded powers to rein in ministerial independence from Lib Dem policy.

Separately, proposals were being put forward by some activists to make it easier for local parties to deselect Lib Dem MPs.

The moves came as David Davis, the Conservative MP and rightwing standard-bearer, announced that he will rebel in the key Commons vote on Thursday by voting against the trebling in tution fees.

Although Davis insisted he was "a rebellion of one," provoked by the damage he said the fees rise will inflict on social mobility, his move prompted coalition fears that a few other rightwing Tories might also break ranks, so reducing, but probably not endangering, the coalition majority in Thursday's Commons vote.

Davis told the Guardian: "The kids being helped are the very, very poor indeed. Free school meals being the bar [for applying for the government's financial support fund plan] means quite a lot of aspirant working class kids will not be helped." He added he was concerned by rising indebtedness. "Kids are already leaving university with high levels of debt before they even go to work. I am worried making this worse will see the next generation significantly set back – unable, for instance, to get a mortgage."

His remarks will severely embarrass the Lib Dem leadership as they claimed the entire tuition fee package as a whole will help social mobility.

remind remind's picture

10's of thousands in the streets today protesting  and all the news can say is "huge amount" of people protesting.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

God I know remind. In fact CBC said they were protesting "higher tuition fees" rather than an all-out nuclear attack on post-secondary funding. Asses.

remind remind's picture

Yep, minimizing propaganda was full blown in every report I heard.

 

Caissa

The coalition government has won the vote to raise tuition fees in England to £9,000 per year - as violent protests take place in Westminster.

Three ministerial aides have resigned over the issue - as the fee rise passed by a majority of 21 votes.

Scotland Yard says six police officers have been hurt in clashes between police and students.

Protesters who had forced their way into Parliament Square pressed against police lines and threw missiles.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11954333

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Congratulations for forming government, Liberal Democrats. You fucking craven shitheads.

abnormal

Catchfire wrote:

All English-speaking nations use the same billion,

Actually no - when I've had UK attornies draft contracts they use the term "thousand millions" - unlike US law firms they do not use "billion".

 

Pages

Topic locked