Go...
If Babblers repudiate long thread titles when pursuing epic fueds, does that mean epic feuds would cease?
I refeudiate this topic.
My theory: someone (no naming names, remember?), unable to handle even the merest hint of winter weather, has barricaded themselves indoors and is trying to start a useless argument. Typical troll behaviour. Perhaps I should alert a moderator.
What's a fued?
I'm glad to see this is tongue in cheek, at least partly.
But neither of the threads this plays on are pursuits of epic feuds.
It certainly creeps into the one I started. But thats hardly surprising considering the more than usual vitriol splashed around here lately.
And I've tried to steer it away from people re-running the feuds.
What's a fued?
It's a little more than kin, and less than kind.
The epic feuds would go on, just under a different name, a shorter name.
Heard about this one again on the radio this morning:
Tepid fugues?
You know, real life feuds as of late are starting to make me miss babble feuds
Fetid pukes?
Anyway, genstrike, the feuds here are more important. You'll want to seek some treatment for that "real life" addiction.
I was going to say "tempus fugit", but this is morphing into the more appropriate "put up your dukes".
But I like long thread titles!
How about long song titles? I have this record:
"I'm Looking For a Guy Who Plays Alto and Baritone and Doubles on the Clarinet, and Wears a Size 37 Suit" by the Ozzie Nelson Orchestra.
"I'm Looking For a Guy Who Plays Alto and Baritone and Doubles on the Clarinet, and Wears a Size 37 Suit"
In the history of personals in the classifieds in your local free distribution newspaper, that counts as an epic fail.
"all the things you could be right now if sigmund Freud's wife was your mother" - Charles Mingus
not quite as long, but in the ballpark