Well, you can feel that way all you want Cue, but I am not trying to misrepresent anything, you and kropotkin are inferring things about Elmore based upon yourselves and your beliefs of what her behaviour and actions might be.
The history that you both have contempt for James and those who are allegedly controlling her, provide the foundation of a disparaging pictorial of Elmore and her actions for supporting James.
Neither of your historical comments are stand alone to this occasion. They can't be. Nor can your giving hypotheticals of what you believe Elmore is doing, as if they were fact.
Anyhow, I bear no ill regard towards you about it, I just wish you would stop inferring others, especially women, would act and believe as you do.
You are even misrepresenting yourself. In the first case you said that I "stated" that Elmore was a hypocrite, and now you are saying I was inferring it. Nope. Never said that. And never inferred it either. In fact, I was pointing out that taking a stand with the party leadership was not necessarily hypocritical at all.
In point of fact, I was going to move on to point out that there were very good reasons to take such a position since James has actually promised a leadership review in November 2011, and that some might consider that since such a process was under way, that pre-empting that was perhaps a little problematic from the point of view of organizational ethics, just because some people felt it would be strategically better to have the review, before the Liberals get their act together.
Fundamentally, there might any number of reasons to back James at this point in time, aside from sympathies with her political beliefs. Personally, I am kind of betwixt being able to come down hard on either side of the issue. What is best is hard to say. What is clear is that it is now a mess.
But I only touched upon that, because I have spent the last bunch of posts dealing with a bunch of baseless accusations from you.