BC NDP: Who should be the next leader? II

106 posts / 0 new
Last post
Catchfire Catchfire's picture
BC NDP: Who should be the next leader? II

Continued from here.

NorthReport

Bob Simpson says "regime change" needed to heal rift in B.C. NDP

 

http://www.straight.com/article-363226/vancouver/bob-simpson-says-regime...

NorthReport

What's Moe Sihota up to these days?  Laughing

NorthReport

I'm actually disappointed that Jenny Kwan will not run, as I believe she has what it takes. Maybe there could be a draft for her to run. Too bad for the bruised feelings or egos, time to get over it and pick the best person for leader. If she doesn't run possibly she could be appointed deputy leader after the leadership race.

Interested Observer Interested Observer's picture

Well, you know I lean green, but it's not like their leader will become the next premier soon, so I figure I still have a say.

Frankly can't stomach most of the BC "Liberal" Candidates, and I welcome Carole's departure, as there is now the potential for someone out there to be a good Premier from the 'left.'  I would like to see a Strong 'scrappy' leader who will be more critical of the current Government than their own party, although if necessary have the capacity and willpower to stand down industrialist interests, but otherwise work to be conciliatory. Someone who knows where they are coming from, but is willing to work for the common good and be post-partisan. Someone who is unafraid to make compromises on HST, as it's unlikely it can be scrapped in my view. Someone who wants to encourage small-businesses, yet can stand up to Big Business interests. Someone who's not anti-union, but is willing to stand up to Big Union Bosses. Obviously someone who has strong green credentials as well. Oh, and they HAVE to support some form of proportional representation. [I used to be an MMP person, but STV kinda grew on me as it encouraged a grass-roots kind of mla selection process to counter the power of the leaders over nomination papers.] I can't guarantee I will vote NDP if there is such a leader as I live in Carole's riding and I don't think I can forgive her for not supporting pro-rep, the whole Carbon Tax thing, and I find her rather uninspiring, but otherwise I want to see something positive in this province happening soon. Oh, and I'm big on GLI, obviously. 

Now, I haven't payed that much attention to BC politics, as it always kind of depressed me, but is there anyone who fits that bill or close to it? 

 

Also, Remind can you stop trying to guilt-trip people into supporting your views? It's getting kinda tiring. 

Also II, Stockholm's "Tories with Composters" thing is mostly a GPO thing as they are more conservative than their counterparts. If you want greens to vote for you, stop calling them names, and give them some respect. It's counterproductive otherwise. 

Also III, please stop trying to diminish the GPC or GPBC leaders, you just look petty and vindictive. I dislike Carole, but I don't start dissing her all the time. I'm also getting tired of Brian White doing that with Carole, even if I largely agree, it's too over the top!  

Feel free to ignore me though. Just sayin'.

NorthReport

I'm beginning to think that perhaps someone from outside the current caucus is needed. What about one of BC environmental leaders? Or a labour leader? And don't think for a second that Gregor is not looking at the situation very closely. 

 

 Maybe if you don't have anything to say, perhaps you should not be talking to the press.

 

No date set for B.C. NDP leadership vote

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/no-date-se...

NorthReport

I suppose Kennedy Stewart is now off the BC NDP Xmas card list.

 

NorthReport

What is Corky Evans up to these days. I want someone who realized there was a problem with our leadership and addressed the issue, not someone who just merrily went along realizing something was wrong, and not doing anything about it. I'm looking for a leader, someone who has a pretty face, but who can kick ass when required. 

Stockholm

Being the first to identify a problem doesn't mean that someone is "leadership material".

scott scott's picture

NorthReport wrote:

Bob Simpson says "regime change" needed to heal rift in B.C. NDP

http://www.straight.com/article-363226/vancouver/bob-simpson-says-regime...

Bob is right about this. Carol James is the symptom, not the problem. The NDP needs more than a new leader, they need direction and some clear, consistant,  progressive policies.

__________________________________

One struggle, many fronts.

NorthReport

Nor is doing nothing.

Stockholm wrote:

Being the first to identify a problem doesn't mean that someone is "leadership material".

scott scott's picture

From a previous thread, but better late than never:

remind wrote:
... how nice to see Green Party supporters and voters here telling the BCNDPers what is up and wrong..

If you think that Green supporters don’t care, or have an interest in, what happens in the NDP, you would be wrong.

Because our FPTP electoral system pretty much keeps Greens from office, many greens look to other parties to actually enact green environmental policies. Many greens expect the Green party itself will never win seats in the leg. This wouldn’t really matter, if other parties implemented a green program.

The BC-NDP has a pretty good program on the environment, as it happens. Unfortunately we heard nothing about it during the last election. Instead we had the boneheaded “Axe the Tax” position which promptly alienated environmentalists. This points to the real problem with the BC-NDP, an unclear program and sudden flip-flops in policy that emanate from the back rooms, and not from the membership.

Just for the record, I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of the Green Party, so I am free to take out an NDP membership and participate in the selection of a leader. I hope some credible candidates crop up. I am leaning towards Gregor right now, but that could change.

__________________________________

One struggle, many fronts.

 

scott scott's picture

NorthReport wrote:
What is Corky Evans up to these days. I want someone who realized there was a problem with our leadership and addressed the issue, not someone who just merrily went along realizing something was wrong, and not doing anything about it. I'm looking for a leader, someone who has a pretty face, but who can kick ass when required.

I know what you mean, having had my ass kicked by him a couple of times.

He is keeping busy running a nursery down the road from me.

Because of boundary redraws, we now live in Kootenay-West (Katrine Conroy NDP) and not his forner riding of Nelson-Creston (Michelle Mungall NDP), so he no longer has a riding to run in unless one of them steps down.

__________________________________

One struggle, many fronts.

Interested Observer Interested Observer's picture

scott wrote:

Because of boundary redraws, we now live in Kootenay-West (Katrine Conroy NDP) and not his forner riding of Nelson-Creston (Michelle Mungall NDP), so he no longer has a riding to run in unless one of them steps down.

 

 

That's too bad. If he became leader though, couldn't he just run in Vernon? 

NorthReport

Too bad Leo Girard is not a BCer. I love that guy.

Malcolm Malcolm's picture

Stockholm in previous thread wrote:

Brian Mulroney plotted against Joe Clark and then replaced him. Paul Martin plotted against Jean Chretien and then replaced him. Ignatieff had his people out undermining Dion at every opportunity and then he took over. In Australia, Julia Gillard deposed Kevin Rudd and then took over.

Stock, you missed an important word in my post: "openly."
Officially, Mulroney endorsed Clark in the leadership review in 83. Martin left the dirty work to lieutenants. Don't know the particulars of the ALP stuff.
I'm given to understand from someone with decent connections that the puppet master for the latest coup was actually one of the "loyal" MLAs.

Aristotleded24

scott wrote:
The BC-NDP has a pretty good program on the environment, as it happens. Unfortunately we heard nothing about it during the last election. Instead we had the boneheaded “Axe the Tax” position which promptly alienated environmentalists. This points to the real problem with the BC-NDP, an unclear program and sudden flip-flops in policy that emanate from the back rooms, and not from the membership.

THe problem with the way Carole spoke about the carbon tax was to frame it as being against taxes. When Layton spoke against a carbon tax in the federal election, he didn't do it for the sake of opposing taxes, he said, "a carbon tax is bad environmental policy because...and we think cap-and-trade is better because...."

Basement Dweller

I wonder if my MP Fin Donnelly would run. Not known to be from either of the warring factions, has his own local support base that would add NDP seats (in the Eastern Suburbs especially), GREEN CREDIBILITY, and charismatic.

Vansterdam Kid

NorthReport wrote:

I suppose Kennedy Stewart is now off the BC NDP Xmas card list.

 

I'm always amazed that he's so well educated, yet never has anything particularly interesting to say. I wish they'd go to Dennis Pilon, or Norman Ruff more often, if they wanted the "academic's quote."

As for Gregor, I think I remember reading somewhere that he isn't interested. I'm not surprised because provincial politics, and the strong party discpline that it requires, doesn't seem to suite him. Plus he'll have enough trouble getting re-elected as Mayor, seeing as that race could be wide open with the right NPA challenger and if COPE puts up a mayoral candidate.

NorthReport

VK, interesting that you say that.

I have been wondering about Vision Vancouver. Ever been to one of their recent events? It's hard to walk around without tripping over some developer. Representing the people of Vancouver, don't make me laugh - I'm seriously beginning to have my doubts about them. Inaccessible, alouf, No time for the little people now that they have been elected. I think I'm going to renew my COPE membership.

NorthReport

Carole is steping down as Leader - the war is over, and NDPers need to put their differences aside. Let's lose this mentality aboujt who was on which side. Quite frankly who cares any more. What we do need to do is pick the Leader that is most electible, and regardless of whether or not they are presently in the Caucus. 

More importantly, people need to start signing up new members now, as there will be little opportuinity to do that after Dec 31, as we need a 90 day minimun membership period to be eleigible to vote for an end of March leadership contest date. The present NDP deicision-makers should be working overtime to sort this out in the next few days.  We have no choice due to the volatility in the BC Liberal camp.

NorthReport

A sleeper issue in the B.C. NDP leadership race: Gordon Campbell's tax cuts

Now that James has announced her resignation as leader, future NDP leadership candidates can reopen this debate.

Should the next NDP leader follow in the footsteps of Obama and maintain his or her right-wing predecessor's tax cuts? Or should the NDP revisit this issue in light of all the revenue that could be generated from raising taxes on the wealthy?

Supporters of higher taxes could frame the issue in this way: by boosting the amount of tax that high-income earners pay, the government could return that back to the average person in the form of lower medical-services premiums.

After all, medical-services premiums are a regressive tax in that middle-income and high-income people pay the same amount per month. (There is premium assistance for low-income residents.)

B.C. and Ontario are the only provinces that charge medical-services premiums. In B.C., these fees are expected to generate $1.74 billion in revenue in the 2010-11 fiscal year. It will top $2 billion by 2012-13, according to this year's fiscal plan.

The right wingers in the media and the business associations will no doubt howl at the mere mention of a personal-income tax increase for the wealthy. But it could go over well with many NDP members in a one-member, one-vote leadership race if it means a rollback in medical-services premiums.

 

http://www.straight.com/article-363301/vancouver/sleeper-issue-bc-ndp-le...

NorthReport

 

MP Peter Julian not ruling out B.C. NDP leadership run

http://www.straight.com/article-363346/vancouver/mp-peter-julian-talks-b...

NorthReport

I agree.
James was a great lady but no party leader

 

http://www.theprovince.com/entertainment/James+great+lady+party+leader/3...

Erik Redburn

NorthReport wrote:

A sleeper issue in the B.C. NDP leadership race: Gordon Campbell's tax cuts

Now that James has announced her resignation as leader, future NDP leadership candidates can reopen this debate.

Should the next NDP leader follow in the footsteps of Obama and maintain his or her right-wing predecessor's tax cuts? Or should the NDP revisit this issue in light of all the revenue that could be generated from raising taxes on the wealthy?

Supporters of higher taxes could frame the issue in this way: by boosting the amount of tax that high-income earners pay, the government could return that back to the average person in the form of lower medical-services premiums.

After all, medical-services premiums are a regressive tax in that middle-income and high-income people pay the same amount per month. (There is premium assistance for low-income residents.)

B.C. and Ontario are the only provinces that charge medical-services premiums. In B.C., these fees are expected to generate $1.74 billion in revenue in the 2010-11 fiscal year. It will top $2 billion by 2012-13, according to this year's fiscal plan.

The right wingers in the media and the business associations will no doubt howl at the mere mention of a personal-income tax increase for the wealthy. But it could go over well with many NDP members in a one-member, one-vote leadership race if it means a rollback in medical-services premiums.

 

http://www.straight.com/article-363301/vancouver/sleeper-issue-bc-ndp-le...

 

By George I think he's got it!   By allowing the idle rich to avoid taxes (did you know I pay more in taxes than most large corporations do?) the middeclass have to pick up most the burden.  And the poor have to remain in permanent misery.  The only meaningful argument (aside from corporate media hype) is that big money won't invest here.    But that is a simple question of political will and the ability to read recent history --they're doing it anyway, except entirely on ther terms.  And the not unheard of ability of more than one country getting together to decide minimum standards of business and finance and regulation.  Something else already done, except under the post-Reagan regime entirely on their terms.  

(FYI, Carole James was the ONly NDP candidate who refused to accept the necessity of raising <income, property or corporate> taxation again; even the one candidate more openly "third way" than her didn't go so far.  That is why James lost my support in 2009.  <her first election she did hint within the party that she might...>   That will remain my bottomline social democratic vs neo-liberal vs litmus test, and I will not let anyone forget it.)

scott scott's picture

NorthReport wrote:
Carole is steping down as Leader - the war is over, and NDPers need to put their differences aside. Let's lose this mentality aboujt who was on which side. Quite frankly who cares any more.

This was never JUST about Carol James. It is about restoring democracy and accountability to the party. As Jenny Kwan's letter says:

Quote:
Under Carole James' leadership, there has been a steady erosion of our democratic principles. Debate has been stifled, decision-making centralized, and individual MLAs marginalized.

Many are shocked at how some critical decisions are made or how caucus decisions have been later altered.

Equally dismaying is how MLAs then learn about these decisions through the media. This poor decision-making practice and a lack of genuine consultation within our Caucus is an ongoing source of frustration for many within the Caucus.

As well, for too long there has been a clear lack of direction under the leadership of Carole James. Whenever a challenging policy decision arises, often the default position is to avoid taking a stand.

The delay in grappling with difficult but critical public policy choices often results in making the NDP irrelevant in the hearts and minds of British Columbians.

If the leader is changed without changing the culture at the top, it will have all been for nothing.

__________________________________

One struggle, many fronts.

freeasabird

Corky Evans would make a great interim leader. He may not want the job permanently but he would be a good man to come to the aid of the party to calm the waters,

Erik Redburn

scott wrote:

NorthReport wrote:
Carole is steping down as Leader - the war is over, and NDPers need to put their differences aside. Let's lose this mentality aboujt who was on which side. Quite frankly who cares any more.

This was never JUST about Carol James. It is about restoring democracy and accountability to the party. As Jenny Kwan's letter says:

Quote:
Under Carole James' leadership, there has been a steady erosion of our democratic principles. Debate has been stifled, decision-making centralized, and individual MLAs marginalized.

Many are shocked at how some critical decisions are made or how caucus decisions have been later altered.

Equally dismaying is how MLAs then learn about these decisions through the media. This poor decision-making practice and a lack of genuine consultation within our Caucus is an ongoing source of frustration for many within the Caucus.

As well, for too long there has been a clear lack of direction under the leadership of Carole James. Whenever a challenging policy decision arises, often the default position is to avoid taking a stand.

The delay in grappling with difficult but critical public policy choices often results in making the NDP irrelevant in the hearts and minds of British Columbians.

If the leader is changed without changing the culture at the top, it will have all been for nothing.

 

New leadership can make a difference and burying some of our axes is essential for healing --the NDp remains a coalition of sorts -but yes, a new party culture and more democratic systems are essential for this to make any lasting difference.

 

Erik Redburn

freeasabird wrote:

Corky Evans would make a great interim leader. He may not want the job permanently but he would be a good man to come to the aid of the party to calm the waters,

 

Corky would have made a great leader himself, but I'm afraid the old guard will never allow for even that much.  We are still "traitors" in the Sinclair-Schreck playbook, and can only be forgiven by being herded back to our natural role as dependable sources of money, free labour and unquestioning support.   That will not happen.

NorthReport

Now's your chance. Instead of the lefties complaining about the NDP, you can all join the party and democratically vote for the prospective new leader. Hurry up though, as there will be a cutoff date soon, and you may miss it. Laughing

 

Erik Redburn

I'm already a member.  I will only campaign for those that campaign for me though. 

NorthReport

BTW if you want to follow what is going on in politics in BC read the Georgia Straight - particularly columnist Charlie Smith
---------------
If people in the party are smart they will listen to Jenny. Thank goodness for her leadership.

 

Holidays play havoc with B.C. NDP's search for interim leader

The public face of the NDP's so-called Baker's Dozen says she has no problem with Carole James staying on as party leader until an interim head can be found.

Jenny Kwan, who last week unleashed a blistering assessment of Ms. James's leadership that helped spark her resignation, said she doesn't believe there's any harm in letting the party head hold on to her post now that the search for a new leader has begun.

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/holidays-p...

NorthReport
NorthReport

Farnworth, Evans, Dix lead contenders to replace Carole James as NDP leader

 

 

The poll also asked respondents to choose the candidate that would be most likely to get them to consider voting for the NDP. The top three to generate interest in voting NDP were MLA Jenny Kwan, Robertson and Farnworth.

 

http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Farnworth+Evans+lead+contenders+rep...

Debater

NorthReport wrote:

 

MP Peter Julian not ruling out B.C. NDP leadership run

http://www.straight.com/article-363346/vancouver/mp-peter-julian-talks-b...

I think the Federal NDP has to be careful about letting its MP's step down to run for other offices.  As the recent by-elections demonstrated, when MP's quit, they risk leaving their parties in the lurch.  Same thing happened to the Liberals in Vaughan and the BQ in Kamouraska-Riviere Du Loup.

NorthReport

Backroom boys forced James out

 

She says: They hated business link

 

 

The other woman at the heart of the NDP's great political divide has a radically different version of why James was deposed.

Kwan, leader of 13 dissident MLAs who openly opposed James's leadership, said the party had to hurry to choose a new leader for fear the B.C. Liberals will call a snap election once their own new leader is in place.

"That's why there was an urgency to get this renewal," Kwan told The Province. "We are going to be ready when they call an election."

Kwan said the new NDP leader will indeed be new, not like the people running for the Liberal leadership.

"They're all old faces," said Kwan, the longest serving NDP MLA. "Even Christy Clark, who is supposed to be new, is old.

"When she was in cabinet, she destroyed our communities with her cuts to programs."

Despite their wildly divergent views of why James lost her job, both women agree that they'll stand by whoever is named the new party leader in hopes the NDP can finally get back to governing B.C. after a decade in opposition.

 

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Backroom+boys+forced+James/3944134/story...

NorthReport

 

James resigned at right time, Macdonald says

 

 

 

http://www.dailybulletin.ca/article/20101208/KIMBERLEY0101/312089998/-1/...

NorthReport

 I agree, but let's move on quickly now and pick a new leader.

 

 

NDP leader Carole James resignation was inevitable after 2009 election defeat

She Had to Go

Bill Tieleman's 24 hours/The Tyee column

Tuesday December 7, 2010

By Bill Tieleman

"There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare."

- Sun Tzu, military strategist, 544-496 BC

Carole James resigned yesterday but the cause wasn't the recent New Democrat MLA caucus revolt -- it was her defeat in the May 12, 2009 provincial election.

The B.C. NDP leader's second consecutive loss to B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell was fatal to her political future. But she refused to acknowledge that fact until Monday, more than 18 months later.

Unfortunately, James decided not to consult with her caucus or the party before announcing just weeks after her defeat that she would be leader going into the 2013 election.

That set in motion a series of events leading to crisis after crisis until James could no simply longer continue.

Like Gabriel Garcia Marquez' novel Chronicle of a Death Foretold, James' political fate was fixed in advance of the final chapter.

But other post-election events masked that reality.

News the provincial budget deficit was six times larger than Campbell pledged and the surprise imposition of the hated Harmonized Sales Tax just weeks after the vote helped drive the BC Liberals into a disastrous lack of public support.

The sudden guilty plea bargain of former BC Liberal ministerial aides David Basi and Bob Virk and the government's agreement to fund their $6 million defence in the B.C. legislature raid case added more nails to a weighty coffin.

But when Campbell was forced to resign by his own caucus revolt, the reality that an election would likely be held in 2011 under a new BC Liberal premier jolted the NDP awake.

The planned yes/no review of James' leadership at the Nov. 2011 NDP convention was no longer soon enough to deal with lingering doubts that she could win a third election try.

Even when Angus Reid Public Opinion showed the BC Liberals nose diving to 26 per cent support and Campbell's personal approval rating dropping to just 12 per cent, James' own numbers failed to rise, registering only 25 per cent while the NDP was at 47 per cent. 


That 22 per cent gap, despite being party leader for seven years, was an insurmountable obstacle to winning an election, when leadership is the key question for voters.

And then a Mustel Group poll came out after Campbell's resignation showing the BC Liberals rising from the dead to 37 per cent, just five per cent behind the NDP's 42 per cent -- the same results the party obtained in the 2009 election.



Mustel's polling also found James' personal approval has dropped nine per cent since September to 33 per cent, putting her just a point above Campbell's own 32 per cent.


And with a new BC Liberal leader -- whether it be Kevin Falcon, George Abbott, Mike de Jong, Moira Stilwell or Christy Clark -- almost forced to call an early election rather than govern for two years without a mandate, James losing again appeared inevitable.

James is a decent person with many talents who has contributed much to public life as a party leader, MLA and before that, a long-time school trustee.

But now the NDP must end internal battles and find a leader who can reinvigorate the party with new ideas and a vision that connects with voters 

 

http://billtieleman.blogspot.com/2010/12/ndp-leader-carole-james-resigna...

Fidel

I still think all of this der leader stuff is nonsense. Look at Campbell fcs! He has about as much personality and leadership qualities as boiled kleenex. How did they manage to fool a phony majority of British Columbians into thinking he was fit to run a province?

Stockholm

freeasabird wrote:

Corky Evans would make a great interim leader. He may not want the job permanently but he would be a good man to come to the aid of the party to calm the waters,

While i think that there may be some good people outside of caucus (maybe even including Corky Evans) who ought to run for the leadership - the post of "interim leader" is one that I think HAS to go to someone who currently sits in the legislature. This person will only be there for a couple of months - but their main role will be to lead the NDP in the legislature when  it resumes in January etc... so having an interim leader who has no seat would defeat the whole purpose of having an interium leader at all!

As for the polls showing that Farnworth and Evans have the most public support - I think that is largely a function of that fact that they were both moderately high profile former cabinet ministers who have been around for a very long time - so people have heard of them. Some of the other people who might make good leaders like John Horgan - simply are not as well known (yet) because they were not part of the NDP government of the 90s (which could be a blessing)

kropotkin1951

Someone should gag and hogtie Paul Ramsey.  The dinosaurs like him and Schreck are doing continuing damage to the the party.  These two were part of the brain trust that reduced the party to two seats before Jenny and Joy and then Carole rebuilt the party. 

NorthReport

I agree, they are rather pathetic don't you think. Some people unfortunately just don't know when to shut up. 

 

kropotkin1951 wrote:

Someone should gag and hogtie Paul Ramsey.  The dinosaurs like him and Schreck are doing continuing damage to the the party.  These two were part of the brain trust that reduced the party to two seats before Jenny and Joy and then Carole rebuilt the party. 

Stockholm

NorthReport wrote:

I agree, they are rather pathetic don't you think. Some people unfortunately just don't know when to shut up. 

 

Maybe you could set an example by stopping with continuing to attack people who you think were on the "wrong side" on the issue of Carole James and instead focus exclusively on who you think would make a good leader looking forward. Learn to take "Yes" for an answer. you won, you got what you wanted - you got rid of Carole James - it seems like you have trouble deciding who you actually support now that the person you oppose is gone.

KenS

Its really unrealistic to expect people not to lash out. Let them vent.

The particular people doing it may be certifiable idiots. But venting has to happen.

KenS

How does the leadership race happens. One member one vote means that the election is outside of Convention. But in the cases I know of it takes place as part of Convention.

Is that the case in BC? If so, the deliberations on the best time for a race will drive when Convention is.

I'll say it again: next Convention is the time to bring in an automatic leadership review vote. Don't be lulled into thinking your favoured leadership candidate will bring it in if he or she wins- even if they say so privately. They wont bring it up during the race [third rail for them]. And win or lose, after the race they will be otherwise occupied.

NorthReport

Another excellent suggestion KenS - I hope other BC NDPers are listening very carefully to this.

 

kropotkin1951

Stockholm wrote:

NorthReport wrote:

I agree, they are rather pathetic don't you think. Some people unfortunately just don't know when to shut up. 

Maybe you could set an example by stopping with continuing to attack people who you think were on the "wrong side" on the issue of Carole James and instead focus exclusively on who you think would make a good leader looking forward. Learn to take "Yes" for an answer. you won, you got what you wanted - you got rid of Carole James - it seems like you have trouble deciding who you actually support now that the person you oppose is gone.

My slag at Ramsey was a direct result of hearing him on the CBC Early Edition this morning.  Yes he should stop with the continuing attacks but he hasn't that was the point.  Maybe you missed the context of both him and Shreck still pissing all over NDP MLA's in the media. Unelected old dinosaurs attacking young progressive elected MLA's and you are on their side? 

Stockholm

KenS wrote:

Its really unrealistic to expect people not to lash out. Let them vent.

The particular people doing it may be certifiable idiots. But venting has to happen.

Why keep venting after you got what you wanted?? venting is something losers do - not winners.

KenS

I'm referring to people saying 'the losers' should just shut up and think about party unity. And that isnt just being done here.

Stockholm

OK, I thought you were still attacking Ramsey over what he wrote over the weekend before Carole James quit.

Centrist

Stockholm wrote:
Some of the other people who might make good leaders like John Horgan - simply are not as well known (yet) because they were not part of the NDP government of the 90s (which could be a blessing)

Actually Horgan was Chief of Staff to Premier Dan Miller, political staff for Premier Glen Clark, and also ministerial assistant to then Minister of Employment and Investment Glen Clark. But I doubt it matters much.

That said, he doen't have much of a profile but is personable, affable, and has a good grip of the issues. He's my horse in this race.

Ipsos released a poll yesterday showing the potential leadership contenders with positive ranking

From the public at large:

[img]http://www.ipsos-na.com/images/news-polls/media/5068-lg.jpg[/img]

 

From NDP voters:

 

[img]http://www.ipsos-na.com/images/news-polls/media/5068-2-lg.jpg[/img]

 

 

 

Pages

Topic locked