All my criticisms of WikiLeaks (not turning over funds to Bradley Manning, criminal involvement in the DDoS, involvement of the vile 4chan/Anonymous movement) have been backed up with facts linked to in reputable media sources. Repeat: my criticisms have been based on facts reported in the mainstream media.
Not they are not, they are completely unsubstantiated conjecture and hyperbole, mostly concocted by yourself.
No one, certainly not the Bradely Manning fund has suggested that Wikileaks is intentionally trying to rip them off. You said that. Indeed key organizers continue to commend Wikileaks for its support of their fund raising efforts.
As for the DDoS attack, you allege there is a connections between Anonymous and Wikileaks, yet have no evidence to support this view. You don't even have evidence that connects Anonymous with what you allege are "criminal" BotNet activities using hacked computers.
Maybe, you just don't understand how these BotNet attacks work, but in any case, you are completely wrong in thinking you can deduce a connection between any of these organizations. This is why you will not find a single expert security analyst stating that they have evidence that Wikileaks is involved in these activities.
Why? Because they don't. You just made it all up on the fly.