For one thing Sirhan Sirhan has confessed to killing Kennedy as well, so a single statement by him saying he didn't is pretty much worthless. But that is what cherry picking facts to fit the fantasy is all about, isn't it Fidel?
His then lawyer had just finished representing Johnny Roselli, the CIA's contact with the mob then. One way of having your patsy found guilty is to have your own paid-off people represent the patsy. I don't know why Sirhan might have been convinced to confess to something he didn't do. One thing's for sure now, though, and it's that he swears he didn't kill RFK.
Do you understand the difference between "not killing" and "not shooting"? As I have pointed out repeatedly no one but Fidel from Rabble actually thinks that all the witnessess were wrong and that Sirhan Sirhan was not in the Ambassador Hotel shooting at Robert F. Kennedy, and trying to kill him.
Except that the local LA cops destroyed a lot of evidence. And there is now reasonable amount of evidence to doubt that Sirhan Sirhan killed anybody at the Ambassador Hotel. Various investigators have suggested Sirhan's account of what happened points to evidence that he was a Manchurian candidate for the CIA - that he was duped, drugged, and fitted up for the assassination of a politician they wanted taking out. There is just as much or more evidence that Cesar shot RFK, or that three known CIA operatives there that day had something to do with it. E. Howard Hunt, the face of evil for the US CIA's black ops all those years, did name Morales as one of JFK's assassins. JFK was Bobby's brother. Both were murdered as well as MLK Jr during the decade of assassinations in America.