Had Enough of the Charlie Sheen Meltdown? - by Lauren Kelley
http://www.alternet.org/story/150137
"Had enough of the media-obsessed Charlie Sheen melt-down? As Sheen-mania started to eat up more and more of the media's attention, and more details of Sheen's fall from grace emerged, it all stopped being so funny. And while his self-abuses are endlessly discussed, his abuse of women is barely broached [or] treated as something mildly amusing.."
If Charlie Sheen wants to snort blow off the asses of porn stars,that's his business..He's making more money that he's ever seen so now he can afford it..Good for him.
As for the fact that he's a serial woman abuser and that is never discussed beyond late night punchlines or tabloid fodder says alot about Hollyweird.
Afterall,that industry's bread and butter relies on female exploitation and the residual abuse which accompanies exploitation.
But I think it's pretty clear that the women who willingly come along for the Charlie Sheen ride of 24 hr parties are using him every bit as much as he is using them...Case in point,the 2 'goddesses' currently living with him.
If his violent reputation and past with women doesn't kill his career,Charlie's doing a good job of destroying it himself.
I'm certainly not losing any sleep over it.
[url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/quiz/2011/mar/01/muammar-gaddafi-charlie... line?[/url]
Charlie Sheen, or Muammar Gaddafi?
Tragically, I scored 5/10, which ties me with a COIN.
I checked out the whose line at the Guardian.
I scored a 6/10.
But I answered Sheen for every question.
I guess when in doubt...
I got 9 out of 10. I only mistook Gaddafi for Sheen once.
Already under discussion here:
