Federal Polling - April 11

116 posts / 0 new
Last post
bekayne

Here's the last national Compas I could find, from the coalition days of December 2008 (Harper with a 31% lead):

http://www.compas.ca/data/081205-CommonsTurmoil-EPCB.pdf

 

Lens Solution

Ipsos-Reid is also a pro-Conservative polling firm, so we should be cautious of their debate poll.

Lens Solution

The debate winner on Twitter: Stephen Harper's stare; PM gaze gets top tweets

 

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5i8qh5nWEAeO...

Paulitical Junkie

Latest Nanos numbers from Twitter:

3 day tracking CTV/Globe/ #Nanos Apr 10-12, C 39.9, L30.4, N 16.3, B 9.1, G 3.8 http://bit.ly/nanos no AG ballot fall-out

 

Got that? NO AG BALLOT FALL-OUT. I give up. Nothing sticks to these Cons.

 

gyor

AG fallout isn't over yet it is just getting started.

Best line in the compass poll Article was about the ndp praying for rain in Quebec for a half century like a man in the desert and sometimes prayer works. Pretty funny.

I also noted that they indicted that NDP support maybe concertrated outside of QC and eastern Quebec so maybe the NDP has better vote density then people expect?

That the NDP is doing well in Northern Ontario is great to hear as well. I also like that the NDP is beating the Liberals in Saskitoba, BC, Quebec. The Liberals are turning into the GTA party.

NorthReport

Nanos

 

Canada
Cons - 39.9%, Up 0.2%
Libs - 30.4%, Down 0.8%
NDP - 16.3%, Down 0.5%
Bloc - 9.1%, Up 1.3)%
Grn - 3.8%, Down 0.2%

Und - 17.7%, Up 0.2%

 

http://www.nanosresearch.com/main.asp

NorthReport

21% lead - too weird.

 

Tories destined for a majority: Pollster

 

http://www.ottawasun.com/news/decision2011/2011/04/12/17974226.html

NorthReport

'We're losing': Edmonton Conservative pleads for help

 

http://www.canada.com/news/decision-canada/losing+Edmonton+Conservative+...

gyor

NorthReport wrote:
'We're losing': Edmonton Conservative pleads for help

 

http://www.canada.com/news/decision-canada/losing+Edmonton+Conservative+...

Hehehe. This leaked memo is a major gaffe, makes the Edmonton cons look weak and afraid, and I'm betting that there are reverbations throughout Edmonton from the leak. If something major is happening in Emonton it might not show up in polls when the Tories so strong everywhere else. Heck the Tories are stronger in Alberta then the Bloc is in Quebec so a growing NDP prenence in parts of Edmonton would be easy to miss.

NorthReport

Maybe the NDP will pick up a couple more seats in the Edmonton area.

NorthReport

Hopefully the NPD will be able to capitalize on this and pick up more seats in the Montreal area.

[quote]

Although the national numbers have hardly moved, Mr. Nanos is detecting changes regionally, especially in Quebec.

He said there is a "noticeable decline" in Liberal support in the province, most of which is concentrated in Montreal.

"So it looks like any gains the Liberals realized on the island of Montreal last week are now dissipating," he said. Mr. Ignatieff had toured for a couple of days in Quebec, through the Eastern Townships and into Montreal.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/tory-support-unharmed-by-g8-spending-but-debates-yet-to-register/article1983312/ [/quote]

gyor

NorthReport wrote:

Maybe the NDP will pick up a couple more seats in the Edmonton area.

one of the ndp candidates in the city has a blog and things sound like they are going above expectations not just in Linda's riding but his. Linda's victory and current strong campaign as well as support from Jack seems to be having a net benifit. It the NDP steals Harper seats in Edmonton it help weaken Harper.

As to a 21 percent split between Harper and iggy and with a strong NDP, iggy would have to be nearly tied with Jack at around 21 percent. This was before the debates. It will be interesting to see what happens afterwards.

Still the polls seem to be swinging wilding like a drunk baseball player. This election is getting crazy.

NorthReport

I think the Liberal collapse is well underway, and hopefully the NDP and the Bloc are going to do well enough to prevent a Harper majority.

Krago

</p> <p>Although the national numbers have hardly moved, Mr. Nanos is detecting changes regionally, especially in Quebec.</p> <p><strong>He said there is a "noticeable decline" in Liberal support in the province, most of which is concentrated in Montreal.</strong></p> <p><strong>"So it looks like any gains the Liberals realized on the island of Montreal last week are now dissipating,"</strong> he said. Mr. Ignatieff had toured for a couple of days in Quebec, through the Eastern Townships and into Montreal.</p> <p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/tory-support-unharmed-by-g8-spending-but-debates-yet-to-register/article1983312/[/quote">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/tory-support-unharmed-by-g8-spending-but-debates-yet-to-register/article1983312/ [/quote</a> wrote:

... or your poll numbers were wrong and support is returning to the same level it was all along.

One BIG problem with tracking polls is that one night of bad (or very good) polls can make it look like a party is soaring or crashing when in fact their support hasn't budged at all.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

NorthReport wrote:

Hopefully the NPD will be able to capitalize on this and pick up more seats in the Montreal area.

I'd much rather see a BQ sweep of Quebec, although that's looking more unlikely right now. However, the BQ at 50 seats is still a possibility.

WillC

Boom Boom wrote:

I'd much rather see a BQ sweep of Quebec, although that's looking more unlikely right now. However, the BQ at 50 seats is still a possibility.

I can't understand why you would prefer that to NDP gains. If there is some sort of "coalition" after the election, it would be have much less support in the rest of Canada if it was dependent on the Bloc.  Those here who don't see them as a separatist menace, see them as the party who says, what's in this for Quebec?

KenS

WillC wrote:

Those here who don't see them as a separatist menace, see them as the party who says, what's in this for Quebec?

Which is absolutely justified in substantive terms, let alone practical considerations of what so many Bloc seats means, given that the Conservatives have the most seats.

Its even debateable how progressive a force the Boc is within Quebec, but there is nothing but romantacism that they are a voice for progressives in the ROC.

NorthReport

Compas

C - 45%

L - 24%

N -16%

NorthReport
Paulitical Junkie

I posted the Compas poll last night and I've since been informed that it's basically a Con propaganda outfit.

KenS

Someone voiced their opinion. You should not confuse that with information.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

I want to see Liberal and Conservative seats in Quebec fall to the BQ. I very much doubt the BQ are in contention for Mulcair's seat.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

dp

Paulitical Junkie

Different poll, different numbers:

"Race tightened in the hours prior to English debate: EKOS

Posted on Wed, Apr 13, 2011, 11:43 am by Frank Graves

Voters appear to be pulling back from giving the Harper government a Conservative majority and are now looking more carefully at other options, an EKOS-iPolitics poll conducted prior to the English-language debate suggests. In what is the tightest period of the race so far, the 11-point cushion that Conservatives had in the opening days of the campaign has been replaced with a scant 5.6-point lead.

Their comfortable and seat-efficient Ontario margin of 10 points has basically vanished and, at these numbers, the Conservatives would be looking at a significantly diminished minority.

...

The other main story of this poll is that the claimed demise of the NDP is clearly premature. The New Democrats are showing important new strength, particularly in Quebec and British Columbia where they now lead. The NDP have risen steadily since the outset of the campaign (interestingly, not at the expense of the Liberal Party). "

CPC- 33.8%

LPC- 28.8%

NDP- 19.1%

Green- 9%

BQ- 7.8%

Other- 1.5%

http://ipolitics.ca/2011/04/13/race-tightened-in-the-hoursprior-to-engli...

The Green party number seems unusually high.

Anonymouse

Boom Boom wrote:

I want to see Liberal and Conservative seats in Quebec fall to the BQ. I very much doubt the BQ are in contention for Mulcair's seat.

Which seats are you thinking of?

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Anonymouse wrote:

Which seats are you thinking of?

All the Conservative seats, certainly. And any Liberal seats they can pick up.

Centrist

Paulitical Junkie wrote:

Different poll, different numbers:

http://ipolitics.ca/2011/04/13/race-tightened-in-the-hoursprior-to-english-debate-ekos/

No kidding the NDP is now in first place at 36.8% in BC. Frankly, I believe that as much as the 13% that Nanos had in BC a few days ago. Wonkyville.

gyor

NorthReport wrote:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/ndp-gains-o...

very interesting article. One thing to note is that what helped Harper is that there appeared to be some rule that if someone attacks you you get an immediate rebuttal which seems fair, but given all the attacks on Harper actually caused Harper to have alot more face time and more opportunity to be heard. If Gilles attacks Jack hard in the French debate this same quirk could benifit Jack that way it did in the English debate for Harper.

bekayne

The Compas poll was for QMI/The Sun. But earlier this campaign Leger was polling for them. What happened? Were they fired because they weren't giving them the results they wanted?

NorthReport

Already posted ok.

EKOS

C - 33.8%

L - 28.8%

N - 19.1%

 

But this is the important part

Quote:

The other main story of this poll is that the claimed demise of the NDP is clearly premature. The New Democrats are showing important new strength, particularly in Quebec and British Columbia where they now lead. The NDP have risen steadily since the outset of the campaign (interestingly, not at the expense of the Liberal Party

gyor

I really hope the BC numbers are real. That huge lead for the ndp in BC would net tons of seats. Both the Cons and Libs would be burned hard.

I don't like the over all numbers in Ontario. Wait the heck is going on in Ontario. Still I think the worst of it is in the GTA and maybe Ottawa. Basically where I live Richmond Hill btw. Figures.

Montreal and Vancouvers numbers were shocking as well. If the NDP numbers were true the libs would hemerage seats to the NDP in Van. Montreal could see a major winfall too depending on how the NDP lead spread out.

bekayne

gyor wrote:
I really hope the BC numbers are real. That huge lead for the ndp in BC would net tons of seats. Both the Cons and Libs would be burned hard. I don't like the over all numbers in Ontario. Wait the heck is going on in Ontario. Still I think the worst of it is in the GTA and maybe Ottawa. Basically where I live Richmond Hill btw. Figures. Montreal and Vancouvers numbers were shocking as well. If the NDP numbers were true the libs would hemerage seats to the NDP in Van. Montreal could see a major winfall too depending on how the NDP lead spread out.

Note the sample sizes though. 39 for Vancouver, 65 for Ottawa

scott scott's picture

Paulitical Junkie wrote:

Green- 9%

http://ipolitics.ca/2011/04/13/race-tightened-in-the-hoursprior-to-engli...

The Green party number seems unusually high.

It is in line with historic numbers. Debate exclusion backlash perhaps?

__________________________________

One struggle, many fronts.

Stockholm

Ekos always has the Greens higher than anyone else - for Ekos 9% is actually quite low - they used to routinely have them at 11-12%

Aristotleded24

gyor wrote:
I don't like the over all numbers in Ontario. Wait the heck is going on in Ontario. Still I think the worst of it is in the GTA and maybe Ottawa. Basically where I live Richmond Hill btw.

I think part of that can be explained that centre-left voters in Ontario generally tend to vote Liberal provincially, so this would no doubt have an impact federally. Plus, with the economy and people wanting to vote against the incumbent, on a broad scale that would help the dominant oppoistion party (the Liberals) even if people overlook local dynamics in specific ridings (i.e. Welland, Bruce County, Essex). It doesn't look like much can be done about that in this election.

Keep in mind that McGuinty is almost certain to lose Ontario in the Fall, so that will open up Ontario for the NDP to build there provincially.

Policywonk

NorthReport wrote:

Already posted ok.

EKOS

C - 33.8%

L - 28.8%

N - 19.1%

 

But this is the important part

Quote:

The other main story of this poll is that the claimed demise of the NDP is clearly premature. The New Democrats are showing important new strength, particularly in Quebec and British Columbia where they now lead. The NDP have risen steadily since the outset of the campaign (interestingly, not at the expense of the Liberal Party

I suspect there is a tight three way race in BC; which means the Liberals are probably not doing well in terms of seats. If the final popular vote (distributing half the Green vote amongst the other parties) were close to this, there would be a substantially reduced minority, with the possibility of the Liberal and NDP seat total exceeding the Conservatives, making some sort of accord more legitimate.

Policywonk

gyor wrote:
NorthReport wrote:

'We're losing': Edmonton Conservative pleads for help

 

http://www.canada.com/news/decision-canada/losing+Edmonton+Conservative+...

Hehehe. This leaked memo is a major gaffe, makes the Edmonton cons look weak and afraid, and I'm betting that there are reverbations throughout Edmonton from the leak. If something major is happening in Emonton it might not show up in polls when the Tories so strong everywhere else. Heck the Tories are stronger in Alberta then the Bloc is in Quebec so a growing NDP prenence in parts of Edmonton would be easy to miss.

Presumably Lewis Cardinal is doing well. The fact that Linda has considerably more volunteers than last election bodes well. I would have thought that the Conservatives would throw everything at her in an attempt to gain a clean sweep in Alberta. If they are vulnerable elsewhere in Edmonton, that may hinder their efforts to support her opponent (sounds as though the Liberals are invisible in Edmonton-Strathcona).

gyor

Policywonk wrote:

NorthReport wrote:

Already posted ok.

EKOS

C - 33.8%

L - 28.8%

N - 19.1%

 

But this is the important part

Quote:

The other main story of this poll is that the claimed demise of the NDP is clearly premature. The New Democrats are showing important new strength, particularly in Quebec and British Columbia where they now lead. The NDP have risen steadily since the outset of the campaign (interestingly, not at the expense of the Liberal Party

I suspect there is a tight three way race in BC; which means the Liberals are probably not doing well in terms of seats. If the final popular vote (distributing half the Green vote amongst the other parties) were close to this, there would be a substantially reduced minority, with the possibility of the Liberal and NDP seat total exceeding the Conservatives, making some sort of accord more legitimate.

Actually I believe Ekos had the NDP higher in BC then the BQ in quebec. That is not a four way tie. That is huge lead for the NDP. Whether that lasts on May 2 is another question.

I refuse to believe all of Ontario is hopeless. Hopefully Jack has a plan.

Btw I know this off topic but I am having ID problems, and in the past I brought my dad to vouch for me and was able to vote. Can I still do that or have the cons ruined that piece of democracy for me as well?

NorthReport

More good news for Layton and the NDP - it's that trust and vision thing.

Harper First, Layton second

Nanos Leadership Index

Harper - 94.9, up 0.9

Layton - 57.1, Up 3.0 expands the lead over Ignatieff for 2nd day in a row

Ignatieff - 49.6, up 1.2

http://www.nanosresearch.com/election2011/20110412-LeadershipE.pdf

 

NorthReport

Great balls of fire!

 

EKOS

Cons - 33.8%, Down 1.5%
Libs - 28.8%, Up 0.7%
NDP - 19.1%, Up 4.9%

Paulitical Junkie

Harper is still WAY too high on the Leadership Index. It's mind-boggling to me and makes me wonder if I'm out of touch.

josh

NorthReport wrote:

Great balls of fire!

 

EKOS

Cons - 33.8%, Down 1.5%
Libs - 28.8%, Up 0.7%
NDP - 19.1%, Up 4.9%

Those numbers would given the Libs and the NDP more seats than the Cons.  But it's hard to believe the Cons are that low.  Just as 45% is way too high.

 

gyor

The liberals are simple invisible in Alberta period. Or near to it. The liberals thew in the towel early on. They have one campaign office for the whole provence. At least that is the word anyway. Has Iggy been to Alberta in this election yet?

As to polls I expect a few wild ones now and again by wow. Just wow. Such huge difference between polls. The only trendsI can see are cons a have a lead, and the NDP is doing well in Quebec and maybe bc.

NorthReport

Read 308.com comments about Compas.

Policywonk

gyor wrote:
Policywonk wrote:

NorthReport wrote:

Already posted ok.

EKOS

C - 33.8%

L - 28.8%

N - 19.1%

 

But this is the important part

Quote:

The other main story of this poll is that the claimed demise of the NDP is clearly premature. The New Democrats are showing important new strength, particularly in Quebec and British Columbia where they now lead. The NDP have risen steadily since the outset of the campaign (interestingly, not at the expense of the Liberal Party

I suspect there is a tight three way race in BC; which means the Liberals are probably not doing well in terms of seats. If the final popular vote (distributing half the Green vote amongst the other parties) were close to this, there would be a substantially reduced minority, with the possibility of the Liberal and NDP seat total exceeding the Conservatives, making some sort of accord more legitimate.

Actually I believe Ekos had the NDP higher in BC then the BQ in quebec. That is not a four way tie. That is huge lead for the NDP. Whether that lasts on May 2 is another question. I refuse to believe all of Ontario is hopeless. Hopefully Jack has a plan. Btw I know this off topic but I am having ID problems, and in the past I brought my dad to vouch for me and was able to vote. Can I still do that or have the cons ruined that piece of democracy for me as well?

I know EKOS had the NDP way ahead in BC. I just don't believe it.

NorthReport

Why not?

Do you know how unpopular the HST is in BC?

Policywonk wrote:

I know EKOS had the NDP way ahead in BC. I just don't believe it.

Stockholm

Its not unbelievable that the NDP could be ahead in BC. The NDP has been the number one party in BC with support in the high 30s on several occasions - (1972 and 1988 come to mind). Its more that it seems hard to believe given that no other poll (so far) has shown the NDP doing that well in BC. Realistically, I have a hunch that the NDP will boost its support in BC from 26% last time to 29% or 30% and the Tories will be in the high 30s.

Winston

With the EKOS second choice numbers and current levels of support, this gives the following vote ceilings (current support + all possible second-choice support):

Cons 43.3%

Lib 45.5%

NDP 44.2%

Green 20.7

Bloc 12.3

All three parties have the same statistical vote ceiling - this could get very interesting

More interstingly, the numbers also show we have a lot of room to grow by taking votes FROM THE CONSERVATIVES.  We are now far and away the second choice of Tory voters.  By multiplying the proportion of each party's supporters listing the NDP as a second choice by that party's current level of support, we can get the following popular support increases from other parties:

BQ 2.9% of popular vote

Lib 12.4% ""

Con 7.1% ""

Green 2.4% ""

While we have a lot of room to grow at the expense of the Liberals, there are a lot of votes available to the NDP that are currently parked with the Tories.  Intersestingly, for the first time since I have been analyzing the second-choice data (since August), we seem to be making some headway into capturing BQ votes, having now captured about 42% of possible Bloc/NDP swing votes. This compares to 26% of Con-NDP swing voters, 38% of Lib-NDP swing voters and 50% of Green-NDP swing voters.

gyor

Winston wrote:

With the EKOS second choice numbers and current levels of support, this gives the following vote ceilings (current support + all possible second-choice support):

Cons 43.3%

Lib 45.5%

NDP 44.2%

Green 20.7

Bloc 12.3

All three parties have the same statistical vote ceiling - this could get very interesting

More interstingly, the numbers also show we have a lot of room to grow by taking votes FROM THE CONSERVATIVES.  We are now far and away the second choice of Tory voters.  By multiplying the proportion of each party's supporters listing the NDP as a second choice by that party's current level of support, we can get the following popular support increases from other parties:

BQ 2.9% of popular vote

Lib 12.4% ""

Con 7.1% ""

Green 2.4% ""

While we have a lot of room to grow at the expense of the Liberals, there are a lot of votes available to the NDP that are currently parked with the Tories.  Intersestingly, for the first time since I have been analyzing the second-choice data (since August), we seem to be making some headway into capturing BQ votes, having now captured about 42% of possible Bloc/NDP swing votes. This compares to 26% of Con-NDP swing voters, 38% of Lib-NDP swing voters and 50% of Green-NDP swing voters.

Bang on, hopefully this fact gets more attention in the future. The fact is while Iggy is higher in the polls thanks to residual brand loyalty, Jack is the one with the greatest growth potiential. Especially against the Tories.

Winston

gyor wrote:
Bang on, hopefully this fact gets more attention in the future. The fact is while Iggy is higher in the polls thanks to residual brand loyalty, Jack is the one with the greatest growth potiential. Especially against the Tories.

Well, unlike Eric Grenier, I am not a blogger with the support of Le Devoir and the Globe, so I doubt my analyses will get much air time.  :) 

Pages

Topic locked