Head of International Monetary Fund Arrested for Sex Attack 2

105 posts / 0 new

Topic locked

Tue, 2011-05-24 14:11

Penny2

Ghislaine wrote:

Penny2, I have a feeling you won't be around here for very long. However, how can someone be "set up" for sexual assault?

Regardless of whether someone told this maid to go into his room or not....he still allegedy sexually harassed her.

If he wasn't inclined to sexually assault, it wouldn't have been possible to set him up.

Ghislaine:

Your forgetting he allegedly sexually assaulted her.
From all I have read, and it's been lots he has been a philanderer but not an attacker.
So why say he is inclined to sexually assault
Perhaps he was inclined to paying for sex?
What if he simply mistook the woman for a bought and paid for hooker?

Tue, 2011-05-24 14:16

#103

Slumberjack

Now that we're over 100 posts, I gave a moment's thought to posting a few grog recipies, as a continuance to the pointlessness of post #101.

Tue, 2011-05-24 14:18

#104

Penny2

Catchfire wrote:

Hi Penny2. Welcome to babble. As you saw in the babble policy, babble defines itself as a pro-feminist space. If you find that "odd" or "childish," you are welcome to head elsewhere. To your blog, for instance. There, you are free to posit any wild ol' theory you like.

ETA. And can I again remind everyone, as this thread is drained to its lees, that there is no evidence whatsoever that the victim was set up.

I find it odd because feminism is just another ism.
It is meaningless.
Does feminism trump truth?
Is DSK automatically guilty because according to feminists he is a "filthy man" A pervert.
Thereby according to feminists he is automatically guilty?

Catchfire: no this place is definitely not for me, to childhish and to full of "isms"

" There, you are free to posit any wild ol' theory you like."

As you are here, free to post a wild theory of bad men and innocent women, of feminism.

"And can I again remind everyone, as this thread is drained to its lees, that there is no evidence whatsoever that the victim was set up."

There is actually no evidence that she was attacked just lots of speculation.
Lots of trial by media. Lots of he said, she said.
Nothing else.

Tue, 2011-05-24 14:20

#105

Catchfire

penny2 wrote:
What if he simply mistook the woman for a bought and paid for hooker?

Um, and that's you.

And that's this thread.

Pages

Topic locked