You mean the representative of our head of state actually followed the direction of the elected head of government? Sounds pretty absolutist and undemocratic to me.
It is when you consider the fact that precedent has established that the monarch/monarch's representative is supposed to follow the will of Parliament, not the direction/will of an imperious or Presidential Prime Minister.
And as for repatriating the constitution, you know why she signed it .... almost 20 years ago.
Yeah, so?
Would it make any difference if the Constitution were drafted and ratified in the 1990s or today?
And why do Canadians swear allegiance to the queen? because she's the head of state.
Do new Canadian citizens swear allegiance to the British monarch?
As I pointed out: She's not a Canadian citizen. She's a British citizen.
Therefore, Canada's head of state is a foreign person who is the head of a foreign state.
According to this new information you have provided, the situation is even worse than I thought.
"Zo," Canada's new citizens are not swearing allegiance to Canada but to the British monarch.
Add to this, Canada's soldiers swear an oath of allegiance to the British monarch, who is their Commander-in-Chief.
Not only is that degrading and humiliating, that's seriously fucked up, dude.