From 500_Apples' closed thread:
Is it possible to believe both that there was an organic movement and that foreign powers used clandestine means in efforts to shape the movement? Perhaps it then becomes a question of degrees - how much foreign influence and how effective was it?
To clarify, this is exactly the kind of discussion babble is meant to have. The threads in question, supported by Larouchean articles, are not.
...based on your arbitrary criteria. My forum title reads 'rabble-rouser' but why do I feel increasingly like 'muzzled-dog'?
There was ample opportunity in every thread you closed for opponents of the argument to voice their opinion - and boy did they! So if your criteria for a "Babble-worthy" discussion is the representation of both arguments, then those threads were not lacking. I would like to point out that not once did any opponent give evidence to the contrary, no matter how superficially it may have eroded the initial hypothesis.
A defense lawyer does not go into the courtroom embodying both sides of the case. Oh and if those threads were a court of law, you would have been asking for an appeal about now. The idea that every forum thread must adequately address polar dimensions of an issue is absurd. We are not writing unbiased reports from the front. Even Rabble stories are tilted. So until you can prove to me that my comments were "racist", "orientalist", "imperialist", or "enablist", I disagree with your decisions.
Your grounds for closing the threads were completely contrived. Just admit it.