Michele Bachmann: And you thought Bush was bad?!?

102 posts / 0 new
Last post
Sven Sven's picture
Michele Bachmann: And you thought Bush was bad?!?

. . .

Sven Sven's picture

Here's a pretty informative piece in The Daily Beast about Michele Bachmann.  She is very much an extremist on social issues.  I have the unhappy distinction of being in her Congressional district here in Minnesota and I think this piece is pretty accurate.

Don't think she can get elected?  Well, Slate ran a pretty good piece the other day contrasting her with Palin.  Palin is an idiot.  Bachmann, while I disagree with her on virtually all social issues, is not completley stupid.  In the Slate piece, David Weigel advises that it would be foolish to discount Bachmann's presidential run as pure fancy.  And, since that Slate piece ran, the latest "straw polls" in Iowa show Bachmann essentially tied with Romney for the lead in that crucial state.

If Bachmann were to somehow win (and I think - hope? - it's unlikely), people will wish good ol' Barack Obama was still in office...

Northern Shoveler Northern Shoveler's picture

The big oil and military establishment will provide her with enough money to be a serious candidate if she appears to be able to delude the voters with libertarian drivel. I think she has little chance of winning the nomination and zero change of beating Obama.  I have never liked Obama but I don't see him being defeated by any "tea bagger" no matter how media savvy.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Thread title changed to remove language marginalizing mental illness.

Sven Sven's picture

Northern Shoveler wrote:

The big oil and military establishment will provide her with enough money to be a serious candidate if she appears to be able to delude the voters with libertarian drivel. I think she has little chance of winning the nomination and zero change of beating Obama.  I have never liked Obama but I don't see him being defeated by any "tea bagger" no matter how media savvy.

Libertarians will not like Bachmann.

Northern Shoveler Northern Shoveler's picture

Sven wrote:

Northern Shoveler wrote:

The big oil and military establishment will provide her with enough money to be a serious candidate if she appears to be able to delude the voters with libertarian drivel. I think she has little chance of winning the nomination and zero change of beating Obama.  I have never liked Obama but I don't see him being defeated by any "tea bagger" no matter how media savvy.

Libertarians will not like Bachmann.

Is this a semantics thing?  I am equating the tea bag movement with right wing libertarian views.  Since she gave the Tea Bag response to Obama I presume she has the support of good libertarians like the Koch brothers.  Is there a sub set of libertarians you are referring to that would vote for Obama over her?

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fRxO_Yx99I

Sven Sven's picture

Northern Shoveler, I'm not sure what a "semantics thing" is but Bachmann is no libertarian.  She is a fundamentalist Xian who is extremely conservative on social issues (e.g., one of her defining issues as a politician has been, and continues to be, her rabid anti-SSM position, as the piece from The Daily Beast outlined).

Sven Sven's picture

Additional evidence of Bachmann's fundamentalist Xian world views: Intelligent Design

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

I watched Bachmann in the Republican debate a couple of weeks ago. I think she dialed down her extreme views just for that performance, but she's still scary.

 

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Anyone remember Dan Quayle?  He was the Sarah Palin of my generation. Laughing

Papal Bull

Boom Boom wrote:

Anyone remember Dan Quayle?  He was the Sarah Palin of my generation. Laughing

 

He was actually elected vice-president.

Northern Shoveler Northern Shoveler's picture

I think that some libertarians will like her just fine.  She may not be your ideal libertarian but that doesn't mean her tea bag rhetoric and anti government mime will not appeal to libertarians other than Jason. 

Quote:

All in all, however, a decent coming out, significantly better than Mr. Huntsman’s in terms of energy and excitement.  Jason Lewis, who did the introduction, will no doubt have an enjoyable second career for a while as crowd-whipper in chief.  Based on this event, the new Iowa poll and her widely praised performance in the New Hampshire debate, Ms. Bachmann has clearly been on a roll in the last couple of weeks.

http://www.fontcraft.com/liberty/?p=9645

http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=2278261

Sven Sven's picture

Northern Shoveler wrote:

I think that some libertarians will like her just fine.

And some Marxists no doubt voted for Obama.  That doesn't make Obama a Marxist.

Timebandit Timebandit's picture

Did you see the Rolling Stone article on Bachmann by Matt Taibbi, Sven?

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/michele-bachmanns-holy-war-201...

Sven Sven's picture

Thanks, Timebandit!  Good article...worth the time to read.

This pretty much sums up Michele Bachmann quite nicely:

Rolling Stone wrote:

In modern American politics, being the right kind of ignorant and entertainingly crazy is like having a big right hand in boxing; you've always got a puncher's chance. And Bachmann is exactly the right kind of completely batshit crazy. Not medically crazy, not talking-to-herself-on-the-subway crazy, but grandiose crazy, late-stage Kim Jong-Il crazy — crazy in the sense that she's living completely inside her own mind, frenetically pacing the hallways of a vast sand castle she's built in there, unable to meaningfully communicate with the human beings on the other side of the moat, who are all presumed to be enemies.

Bachmann's story, to hear her tell it, is about a suburban homemaker who is chosen by God to become a politician who will restore faith and family values to public life and do battle with secular humanism. But by the time you've finished reviewing her record of lies and embellishments and contradictions, you'll have no idea if she actually believes in her own divine inspiration, or whether it's a big con job. Or maybe both are true — in which case this hard-charging challenger for the GOP nomination is a rare breed of political psychopath, equal parts crazed Divine Wind kamikaze-for-Jesus and calculating, six-faced Machiavellian prevaricator. Whatever she is, she's no joke.

This last paragraph was interesting warning to the cultural elite in America (both those on the right and the left):

Rolling Stone wrote:

Michele Bachmann has found the flaw in the American Death Star. She is a television camera's dream, a threat to do or say something insane at any time, the ultimate reality-show protagonist. She has brilliantly piloted a media system that is incapable of averting its eyes from a story, riding that attention to an easy conquest of an overeducated cultural elite from both parties that is far too full of itself to understand the price of its contemptuous laughter. All of those people out there aren't voting for Michele Bachmann. They're voting against us. And to them, it turns out, we suck enough to make anyone a contender.

Northern Shoveler Northern Shoveler's picture

Sven wrote:

Northern Shoveler wrote:

I think that some libertarians will like her just fine.

And some Marxists no doubt voted for Obama.  That doesn't make Obama a Marxist.

I posted links to Libertarians who call her one.  I am not a Marxist but I would listen to a Marxist views on whether someone was a Marxist.  No Marxists claimed Obama was a Marxist, even if they voted for him.  You can't say that about Libertarians and Bachmann.  Some of them claim that she is and since I am not a libertarian who am I to disagree.

Sven Sven's picture

Oh, and another thing about Bachmann.  One might think that the biggest political fundraiser in Congress would be some pol from New York, Florida, Texas, or California.  Nope.  It's Bachmann.  In the last election cycle, she raise an all-time record for a Member of Congress: Over $13 million (the typical House Member raised less than $2 million) -- 96% of which came from individuals (not PACs) and, interestingly, the majority of her funds were raised from small individual contributors (i.e., those whose total contributions for the election cycle totaled 200 bucks or less).

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Late night comics will have a field day with Bachmann if (heaven forbid) she becomes the GOP candidate. But could America survive her?

Sven Sven's picture

Boom Boom wrote:

Late night comics will have a field day with Bachmann if (heaven forbid) she becomes the GOP candidate.

She's a walking quote machine.

Boom Boom wrote:

But could America survive her?

Could the world survive her??

Sven Sven's picture

Northern Shoveler wrote:

Some of them claim that she is and since I am not a libertarian who am I to disagree.

Well, I'm a libertarian and I know other libertarians who loathe her (and we certainly qualify as "some" libertarians).  So, follow the last five words of your quote above.

Frmrsldr

Northern Shoveler wrote:

Since she gave the Tea Bag response to Obama I presume she has the support of good libertarians like the Koch brothers.

The Koch brothers are not anti-big government, anti-big spending, antiwar/anti-intervention libertarians or paleocons.

They are big government, big spending, War Party, prowar chickenhawk, pro American Empire, pro military-industrial complex neocons.

milo204

i read on democracy now that she thinks bush was a communist....A COMMUNIST!  

she also hangs out with convicted money launderers like Franklin Vennes, white supremacists like John Eidsmoe, etc, etc...

 

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/6/28/a_perfect_product_of_the_religious

 

wage zombie

I think at this point she's more likely to than Romney to get the nomination, which would make her the favourite of those declared.

I don't know who else will enter the race, but if Texas Gov Rick Perry enters I think he'll win it.

I think the Paulites (maybe this is who Sven means by "the Libertarians") will be much more organized and focussed than people expect--but I'm not sure how they will affect the race.  I'm surprised Gary Johnson hasn't gotten more traction--he seems like a "safer" (more accessible?) Libertarian candidate than Ron Paul.  Maybe he is just not acceptable to TPTB.  I think he'd be the Repubs best chance to beat Obama.

Bachmann is enough of a right wing idealogue when it comes to slashing govt programs that I think the Libertarians would be satisfied.

I doubt Palin will enter at this point.  Any other possibilities?

Sven, would you consider voting for a Johnson-Bachmann ticket over Obama-Biden?

Noah_Scape

Oh gosh ya, I broke out laughing today, its so funny.

Here are a few one liners:

"This is not Michele Bachmann being a kook. This is our treasury secretary on tape and on camera."

"We are working on the light bulb bill. If the Democrats can hose up a light bulb don't trust them with the country."

"That's what the Bill of Rights is all about-to secure our individual liberties from an overweening huge bureaucratic large big government."

"this is where the shot was heard around the world in Lexington and Concord."

"we need to have carbon dioxide as part of the fundamental lifecycle of Earth."

"Where in the Constitution does it say the federal government should regulate potatoes in school lunches? It doesn't."

"it didn't matter whether they descended from known royalty or whether they were of a higher class"

"the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States."

Of John McCain - "He is not my man," she said. "Our candidate was chosen by the media. But there are other races out there."

 

Those are mostly from here> http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/151439/psycho_talk%3A_the_32_craziest_t...

 

Sven Sven's picture

milo204 wrote:

i read on democracy now that she thinks bush was a communist....A COMMUNIST!  

 

He's not?!?

Tongue out

DaveW

re: "we need to have carbon dioxide as part of the fundamental lifecycle of Earth."

 

uh, that is true

Frmrsldr

DaveW wrote:

re: "we need to have carbon dioxide as part of the fundamental lifecycle of Earth."

uh, that is true

Yes, but do We need to add to the carbon dioxide that's already there?

DaveW

that is a second question;

but on the issue of the plain meaning of the statement above, yes it is true

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Someone wrote on Facebook: Bachmann graduated from Oral Roberts University Law SchoolLaughing

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

"Bachmann stands by claims that 'Founding Fathers' ended slavery"

Rep. Michele Bachmann, who officially announced yesterday in Iowa that she is running for president, appeared on "Good Morning America" Monday, where George Stephanopoulos attempted to clarify some of her previous statements.

Among them: Bachmann's claim that "the Founding Fathers who wrote the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence worked tirelessly to end slavery.

"Now with respect, Congresswoman, that's just not true," Stephanopoulos said. "Many of them including Jefferson and Washington were actually slave holders and slavery didn't end until the Civil War."

Bachmann dodged the question, answering, "Well, you know what's marvelous is that in this country and under our Constitution, we have the ability when we recognize that something is wrong to change it. And that's what we did in our country. We changed it. We no longer have slavery. That's a good thing. And what our Constitution has done for our nation, is to give us the basis of freedom unparalleled in the rest of the world."

She goes on to claim that John Quincy Adams, who was a small boy during the Revolutionary War and did indeed eventually work to abolish slavery, should be counted as a "Founding Father."

Watch the visibly distraught Stephanopoulos' interview with the tea party candidate, in which she discusses eliminating the minimum wage entirely, Sarah Palin and her foster children.

(video embedded at the link)

comment from a friend on the video: The best part of that clip is George Stephanopoulos's face...it's great...you know he is thinking "where did this bone head just come in from?"

babble formatting took me 15 minutes to correct this post.

Northern Shoveler Northern Shoveler's picture

Frmrsldr wrote:

Northern Shoveler wrote:

Since she gave the Tea Bag response to Obama I presume she has the support of good libertarians like the Koch brothers.

The Koch brothers are not anti-big government, anti-big spending, antiwar/anti-intervention libertarians or paleocons.

They are big government, big spending, War Party, prowar chickenhawk, pro American Empire, pro military-industrial complex neocons.

 

Yes they are all that and they also fund various groups that proudly claim to be libertarian.  Bachmann has no coherent political ideology just as she appears to have no cogent grasp of American history.  But she is also wrapping herself in the libertarian colours.  She follows the money.  The religious right has lots, the Koch brothers have lots.  She is an extremely intelligent and shrewd self promoter.  

I agree about people like the Koch brothers not being anything but self interested but they claim to be anti-government and for individual freedoms based on a market economy.  As a left wing person at least I don't have to worry about billionaires usurping the Black Bloc.  But then as a left wing person I am not allowed to urge my supporters to bring guns to rallies to show politicians you mean business.

 

Sven Sven's picture

wage zombie wrote:

Sven, would you consider voting for a Johnson-Bachmann ticket over Obama-Biden?

Well, since I rarely give much thought or weight to the VP candidate (perhaps I should), I would vote for Johnson over Obama pretty much regardless of who Johnson's VP candidate was.

Uncle John

The bourgeoisie (known as "Corporate America") is very much in charge in America. Corporates do not like getting nasty letters about the politicians they support, so when it comes down to the wire, the pols tend to dial down the socially conservative rhetoric.

Malcolm Malcolm's picture

In the last two days, Bachmann has

  • Pledged to use a serial killer as a role model, and
  • Defied a recording artist's request to stop using his music at her rallies.

 

Clearly the former was mere stupidity.  In one Iowa town she pledged to look to the example of the town's own John Wayne.  Except that John Wayne the actor never lived in that town - but John Wayne Gacy had.

Tom Petty's lawyers presented the Bachmann campaign with a cease and desist order over her use of American Girl.  The next day the song played for 28 seconds before suddenly stopping. 

Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

All I got to say for now is I can't wait to see what Saturday Night Live makes of her...

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

....or Letterman and Leno! Laughing

Caissa

Tina Fey, where are you?

wage zombie

Gary Johnson Condemns FAMiLY Leader Pledge As ‘Promise To Discriminate’

Quote:

 

Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson

Republican presidential candidate and former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson spoke out over the weekend against the FAMiLY LEADER’s “marriage vow” that rivals Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) have already signed. Arguing that “government should not be involved in the bedrooms of consenting adults,” Johnson condemned the pledge as “unRepublican” and a “promise to discriminate

The Republicans will never nominate him of course--but I think he's the only Republican running who would have a chance at beating Obama.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Michele Bachmann says she makes every decision in life based on what God tells her to do. Bill Maher says in his day, when someone heard voices like that, you'd call Bellevue.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

CNN iss reporting today that the Bachmann family business - a "Christian Counselling Centre' - counsels gays to make them straight. Hopefully this investigation will knock her off the lead in Iowa, but I doubt it.

laine lowe laine lowe's picture

That marriage vow pledge had a passage about how family friendly slavery was. Bachmann when confronted said she hadn't read that part and since it being pointed out, it's been scrubbed from the pledge. This woman is unfortunately a useful idiot.

Mr.Tea

I predict she gets the nomination. And then its 50/50 as to whether she wins.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

I think Obama can beat Bachmann easy - despite all his faults. She's too extreme. If Bachmann does get the Repug nomination, that will mobilize the Democrats like nothing else.

 

wage zombie

I think she's the frontrunner right now, but I do not think she will get the nomination.  It's still very early, so if she's got momentum now it may be hard for her to keep it.  Rick Perry might enter the race which would cut into her support.  If the GOP starts getting viewed as too extreme Romney will get a boost.

I think Bachmann's the most likely of those declared to get the nomination, but not better than even chance.

I really doubt she could win if she gets the nomination.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

wage zombie wrote:

 Rick Perry might enter the race which would cut into her support. 

Top 5 most outrageous statements from Rick Perry's prayer rally

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture
knownothing knownothing's picture

They are all puffballs compared to Ron Paul. He says something and they say it a few days later.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Heard this on CNN a few hours ago: "If Sarah Palin decides to contest the nomination, she will attract dump trucks full of money".

Pogo Pogo's picture

Boom Boom wrote:

Heard this on CNN a few hours ago: "If Sarah Palin decides to contest the nomination, she will attract dump trucks full of money".

  Are you sure it wasn't "dum clucks"?

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

There was also a short segment on CNN on the topic "Obama will be a one-term President". In the GOP, commentators last night said if Palin contests the nomination, she will be the instant front-runner of the pack.

wage zombie

Obama will cruise to an easy win.  Palin, Bachmann, Perry are all too toxic, Romney can not inspire the Tea Party crowd, and the Libertarians, while just as dangerous as the rest of the field, will not have the backing of the power elite due to their isolationist bent.

I think Gary Johnson could possibly beat Obama but he has no chance for even top 5 among Republicans.  Of those who could win the nomination Romney could make it closest, although he could draw out a right wing third party candidate to siphon off his votes.

Pages

Topic locked