Here are some other sources and one thing is clear. None of them accept his ideology as Zionist but they all spoke out because it is a big part of his manifesto. Instead of that kind of denial on babble we got pro Israel activists attacking the messenger as anti-Semitic. I prefer knowing what this man is actually promoting even if it is a mish mash of politically irrational thought.
You're completely ridiculous. Now anyone who objects to your promoting ludicruous conspiracy theories without so much as a thread of evidence, written by a known anti-Semite are now "pro Israel activists"? The scary part is that I think this isn't just some cheapt rhetorical device. You actually seem to believe this shit...
How gives a shit if this guy thought of himself as a zionist, whatever his warped understanding of that now meaningless term to be. The guy who shot Congresswoman Gifford listed The Communist Manifesto as one of his favourite books. Does that, therefore, discredit the entire ideology of what might be called "socialism"? Should all people on the left be assumed to support his shooting spree in Arizona? Should we speculate as to whether Cuba may have been behind it (the complete lack of any evidence notwithstanding) because the guy had a "socialist" book?