Tommy Douglas, by Giller Prize winner, Vincent Lam

11 posts / 0 new
Last post
Gaian
Tommy Douglas, by Giller Prize winner, Vincent Lam

next post

Gaian

Sample of the marvelous list of vignettes from Tommy's life in Parliament - and something of his nationalist spirit (and why the West was not won):

"During the energy crisis of 1973, the NDP held the balance of power with a Trudeau minority government. Douglas urged federal action to preserve domestic oil supply for Canadian rather than U.S.needs, and to create a publicly owned petroleum company to defend Canadian oil interests.

"Frustrated by months of inaction on the issue, Douglas and (David) Lewis eventually agreed that the NDP would have to bring down the government unless it took action on energy. Trudeau was informed. The following day Trudeau announced initiatives that would meet all the NDP's demands. When Trudeau had finished speaking , Douglas turned to his fellow MP Bill Knight and said, 'Well, how do you like that? He hardly missed a word ?' "

Douglas's critics "grumbled that he was anti-American. The truth was that he spoke on many occasions against driving out U.S.investors and opposed trade prejudices in the form of 'artificial barriers against foreigh capital, or in discrimination against foreign firms.' Rather, he felt it was Canadians' responsibility to assert more influence over their economy with new investment and initiatives. He spent far less time criticizing the United Statesthan he did questioning Canadian politicians about having given in with little negotiation to the interests of large corporations, many of which happend to be American."

Lam, a Toronto hospital physician, was very taken with "Douglas's achievement in introducing medicare," where he "convenced a nation that in a civiliz\ed society, heealth care should be considered essential to individual and social wello-being, and viewed both as a public right and a collective obligation."

Taking over a bankrupt, impoverished province, "he couldn't immediately deliver the full range of the CCF's program for social democracy within a broken economy. As the province's private and public finances strengthened, his government pressed forward with social innovations and ultimately universal health insurance."

In the battle to introduce a public medical care program,ironically, the CCF, "the party synonymous in Canada with workers' rights to organize and strike - found itself importing strikebreakers in the form of replacement doctors from outside the province...In this case the government's obligtion to ensure the delivery of essential services could, and did, trump the rights of a group of workersa to collectively deprive the public of those essential services." One gets the sense that Lam would have gone to Saskatchewan in a heartbeat if invited by Douglas.

But "Douglas's political fortunes suffered no greater short-term blow than during the birth of medicare. After almost two decades had been spent building Saskatchewan's economy, civil service (the federal Liberals would bring several of the 'Saskatchewan Mafia' to lead Ottawa's civil service), social services, the political legitimacy of the CCF, and his own credibility as premier, the birth of medicare in Saskatchewan should have been a crowning achievement for Douglas. Instead, the surrounding events meant that he left provincial politics in circumstances of conflict and failed to win his federal seat in Regina in 1962."

For this observer, who reached voting age during that struggle and understood even back then that the press could do bad things to the minds of the masses of mainstreet,it still left one in doubt about the capacity of some folks to , like the sparrow, sort the grains of reason from the surrounding turd...one among a number of rural similes that Tommy used to lighten the beginning of his speeches.

M. Spector M. Spector's picture

Quote:
In this case the government's obligation to ensure the delivery of essential services could, and did, trump the rights of a group of workers to collectively deprive the public of those essential services.

This could have been taken from a speech by Lisa Raitt about airline workers.

This was not a case of union-busting or depriving workers of the right to collective bargaining. It was a political strike by privileged, non-union professionals aimed at blocking progressive social change. Douglas understood the difference.

Gaian

I'll forgive Lam for his ignorance, given his very good intentions. I'm sure he would have heeded the call for help and gone west.

There are essential services, and then there are essential services, for sure. But not to bog down and nitpick, unless you want to insist that Lam is somehow something like Raitt at heart. :)

Sineed

Vincent Lam wrote:
In the battle to introduce a public medical care program,ironically, the CCF, "the party synonymous in Canada with workers' rights to organize and strike - found itself importing strikebreakers in the form of replacement doctors from outside the province...In this case the government's obligtion to ensure the delivery of essential services could, and did, trump the rights of a group of workersa to collectively deprive the public of those essential services." One gets the sense that Lam would have gone to Saskatchewan in a heartbeat if invited by Douglas.

I concur with folks saying Lam mis-read the situation. Physicians mounted the most organized opposition to single-payer health care and our current system, where physicians are essentially self-employed professionals who submit their bills to the provincial health plans, is the compromise that was arrived at in order to get the physicians on-side.

To equivocate the Physicians Strike with the travails of oppressed workers everywhere is beyond silly. Lam put his foot in it with this one. He is, however, a gifted writer of fiction - I just read "Bloodletting and Other Miraculous Cures," and recommend it highly.

Stick to fiction, Vince.

Gaian

quote: "Stick to fiction, Vince."

You'd actually have to read the whole work. Very factual, good bibliography, much time spent not attending to sick people or the kids.

I made a mistake in throwing that one out there in the babble arena, where it is immediately taken as representative of the whole book. You are clearly just another overpaid physician, Vince, who cannot identify with "the travails of workers everywhere," and "silly" to boot. No hint of a Norman Bethune there at all in that fragment from your work. :)

M. Spector M. Spector's picture

I accept your apology.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

I thought Bloodletting was rather poorly written. I couldn't finish it.

I have to admit, I find the combination of Lam and Douglas to be an odd pairing. I wonder how/why it came about.

Gaian

One always has to read the book to answer such questions...particularly if you don't trust the reviewer. :) (Although the imaginative could suppose that a physician who believes in what he is doing might just admire the fella who has saved so many, many lives by giving life to public medicine in Canada). With that thought, perhaps John Ralston Saul believed they might fit for his Extraordinary Canadians series.

Sineed

Gaian wrote:
One always has to read the book to answer such questions...particularly if you don't trust the reviewer. :)

Always an excellent point. 

Gaian wrote:
I made a mistake in throwing that one out there in the babble arena, where it is immediately taken as representative of the whole book.

This is likely. Smile Though you have inspired me to read the book.

Catchfire wrote:
I have to admit, I find the combination of Lam and Douglas to be an odd pairing. I wonder how/why it came about.

It seemed odd to me too at first blush, mainly because the dust jacket on "BLoodletting and Other Miraculous Cures" said that Vince was working on a novel, and I expected that to be his next book. But doesn't it make sense that a physician who works in the Canadian healthcare system may be intrigued by the person who gave us that system? Particularly a physician with a writerly bent.

Gaian

M. Spector wrote:

Quote:
In this case the government's obligation to ensure the delivery of essential services could, and did, trump the rights of a group of workers to collectively deprive the public of those essential services.

This could have been taken from a speech by Lisa Raitt about airline workers.

This was not a case of union-busting or depriving workers of the right to collective bargaining. It was a political strike by privileged, non-union professionals aimed at blocking progressive social change. Douglas understood the difference.

If you ever get around to reading the book, you will find Lam is very, very positive about Douglas. He was assigned the task of eulogizing a Great Canadian, and was very clear and precise in condensing the life's work of a marvelous human being. And as I have mentioned to another skeptic, the lives of many, many marginal people have been saved - along with their peace of mind - by the battling Scot,and the doctor had to appreciate that.

I can see now that I should have made clear that the one paragraph that has so disturbed the equanimity of so many is really an anomaly.

I purchased the book because it provides a marvelous history of the development of Canada's welfare state. That's the one being trod on by your real enemies, the folks insidiously beavering away at the destruction of public medicine in Canada.

I assume that Lam would not understand the literary climate here at all.