What I haven't heard, interestingly enough, is people who disagree with [Cullen] about the plan but are choosing to support him anyway. Does anyone know of anyone who fits into that category (prominent or no)?
I have heard it somewhere in my travels. Not here. But where, cannot remember.
I talked to someone in Nathan's campaign who seemed genuinely floored when I praised him, but said I would not consider him for #2. "Just for that!?"
That said- |I have sort of waffled.
If I'm not comfortable with anyone else [given the number of choices, how likely is that come March?].
Or even if I am, but Nathan is showing an outstanding ability to connect with people.
In principle.... I'll listen and reserve judgement about the possibility of a big fudging of his plan.
Mind you, I dont get what he is on about in general and haven't paid much attention. But if I'm looking at Nathan Cullen in March, its a safe bet that I am re-eaxaming everything [again].
So who knows.
But the more I understand how the idea behind his planseems to suffuse his whole approach, the less I can see how he can chalk it up as best left behind, and still maintain a cohesive campaign message.
Have I managed to cover all the bases there? Run back and forth on them too.