The point of bringing up nationalization was the larger question of the trend in watered down goals of social democracy.
Its one thing to agree that there are watered down goals, and that needs to be turned around... and as a starter at least not allowed to get worse.
Its another thing to agree on what we want to make stronger. I picked nationalization because its the poster child for what we do not agree on. There is broad agreement that social democracy has gone limp on redustribution and fulsome regulation. But a lot of us- and I would submitt easily a majority- who agree on that much, do not miss the demise of calls for nationalization and feel it should stay in the dustbin of history.
I think I already said that. Regardless of whether you agree even somewhat, is it clear at least?