How do you compose a substantive response to something so blatantly made-up? Prove that we weren't created by a flying spaghetti monster.
NDP leadership race #136
Fri, 2012-03-23 15:30
#102
Fri, 2012-03-23 15:31
#103
@Charles Yes, attacking your fellow deputy party leader via the National Post does make you someone who attacks the left in caucus. And, ok, I should have written 'someone who has a record of governing as a centre-right liberal,' to be precise. Still, I think I have 'done my research' and so there's no need for the hyperbolic adjective-bombing. If you have a substantive response to my piece's arguments I'm all ears.
How can there be a substantive response to what amounts to a childish puff piece. Pretty language doesn't make something substantive.
Fri, 2012-03-23 15:40
#104
Megan Leslie says Tom is ready to lead tomorrow and says his intro is perfect :)
Fri, 2012-03-23 15:45
#105
A brief update from the convention floor.
Cullen unexpectedly fat but well received, esp when he decried litmus test.
Too many fundraising dinners? 
Fri, 2012-03-23 15:49
#106
Seeing people on twitter complaining about Mulcair being drummed in as this is some kind of Liberal/ego thing. Wasn't Andrea Horwath drummed in at the Ontario convention. I sort of remember someone saying that at the time- in a positive way. Does that mean Horwath is some evil centrist? Sure didn't sound like it at the opening.
Fri, 2012-03-23 15:54
#107
I wouldn't take the comments on twitter *too* seriously. You'll see some hyper partisan stuff from a small group, and it has a way of sticking out from the majority who don't especially care.
Thought Mulcair did a very competent job. Nothing that made me want to get off my chair and cheer, but enough to make me confident that he'd do a good job as leader.
I actually found Topp and Cullen did the best job of exciting me thus far, and I welcome the depth of talent among our candidates.
Fri, 2012-03-23 15:57
#108
Catchfire
Pages
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3