Liberal-NDP Majority Government Budget 2

14 posts / 0 new
Last post
NDPP
Liberal-NDP Majority Government Budget 2

Deal Reached, but Battle Rages On Over Ontario Budget Bill

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/deal-reached-but-battle-rag...

"The Ontario minority government's budget bill is set to pass by the end of June, paving the way for a new surtax on the rich and a freeze on corporate tax rates effectively July 1. House leader for all three parties reached an accord late Wednesday that allows for more time to debate the Omnibus, 351 page bill.

However, the agreement will not end the bickering over a key provision that is not contained in the budget bill itself - wages for public sector workers who bargain collectively..

hardly 'battle rages' - more like pillow-fight between political bedfellows

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Lest we forget: (from previous thread)

 

Liberals Bury "Unprecedented Power Shift" In Ontario Budget

At a press conference on Monday, CUPE Ontario President Fred Hahn and lawyer Steven Shrybman cited that, in their legal opinion, an act buried in the Ontario Liberal government's mammoth budget bill makes sweeping changes that open the door to privatizing almost any crown corporation or government service, and will lead to more back-room deals. Hahn, president of the The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Ontario, unveiled this legal opinion written by Shrybman, a partner at Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP practicing in public interest and international trade law, on Schedule 28 of the budget legislation, Bill 55.

On Monday, NDP Leader Andrea Horwath referenced this legal opinion during Question Period as Premier Dalton McGuinty tabled a motion to limit clause-by-clause debate on the budget to 13 hours. McGuinty reiterated on Monday his desire to implement the entire bill and the New Democrats try to get more time to debate the budget's controversial proposals to outsource some services to the private sector.

"This morning, we got a real example of why exactly we need to look carefully at the government's omnibus 300-page bill," said Horwath.

McGuinty stated that while the government has looked into privatization of assets like Hydro One and the LCBO, "There will be no fire sales." Finance Minister Dwight Duncan told reporters that CUPE's legal opinion is "full of holes."

- snip -

CUPE Ontario is calling on all three parties to remove this disastrous Act from the budget bill immediately.

"The Liberals are taking a page from Stephen Harper's playbook. They're attacking the foundations of our democracy, and hiding the legislation in a huge budget omnibus bill," said Hahn. "We believe the public has a right to know what its government is doing, and has a right to have a say in how services are delivered. Schedule 28 takes the last requirements for accountability and transparency and throws them out the window. That's something that should be seriously debated in the house."

 and:

 

Environmental laws are too important to be changed without public debate

excerpt:

Recently, Ontario's current Environment Commissioner has sounded the alarm about the Liberal government's decision to change many laws protecting the provincial environment, as part of the omnibus budget bill presented to the legislature this spring by Finance Minister Dwight Duncan. This approach is eerily similar to federal Conservative Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's budget bill that proposes gutting federal environmental assessments and protections as well.

By including important changes to many of Ontario's environmental laws in the provincial budget bill, the McGuinty government is effectively bypassing the public consultations and transparency required by the Environmental Bill of Rights.

Digging down into the details, the bill includes significant changes without public consultation to seven environmental laws, including to the Endangered Species Act, the Crown Forest Sustainability Act and the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act. The Liberals claim these changes are necessary to save money but are not intended to undermine environmental protection. However, closer inspection reveals otherwise.

The proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act would mean that industries could harm endangered species without considering alternatives, and that logging companies could be exempt from the current requirement to prepare forest management plans or adhere to sustainable harvest limits. These exemptions could give private companies the permission to do as they wish on public land without regard for wildlife and other values.

 

Grandpa_Bill

Thanks, B B, for your Lest We Forget reminder from the previous thread.

Is it really possible that Andrea & Co. are going AWOL on the matter of omnibus bills?  Say it isn't so!

 

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Fuck, I hope not, and I don't even live in Ontario. Frown

mark_alfred

To garner NDP support, McGuinty is backing off on his plans to privatize more services.  See Toronto Star article on this.

NDPP

But the crushing of the poorest Ontarians will continue as agreed.

Stockholm

This is soooo true:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/06/05/kelly-mcparland-ontarios-...

"There is an odd parallel in the way Stephen Harper and Dalton McGuinty do business. For two Ontario boys born three years apart and allegedly separated by a chasm of political party beliefs, you get the feeling they watch one another’s slippery moves and mutter, “Jeez, I wish I’d thought of that.”

Harper gets the harsher press, though perhaps only because he has a higher profile and there’s a bigger media crowd in Ottawa, with not much else to do but follow around the prime minister and complain about his choice in socks. McGuinty operates out of the provincial legislature at Queen’s Park, which is sparsely covered and gets most of its ink in the Toronto Star, which desperately wants to be friendly even while breaking stories about the latest Liberal disaster. The Star assumes Stephen Harper is lying any time its sees his lips moving; it gives McGuinty the benefit of the doubt until it can no longer avoid admitting that once again he’s treating the truth with magnificent disdain."

Grandpa_Bill

mark_alfred wrote:

To garner NDP support, McGuinty is backing off on his plans to privatize more services.

Surely Andrea & Co. will demand more than that, eh, else why would we have voted for them?!

mark_alfred

Grandpa_Bill wrote:

mark_alfred wrote:

To garner NDP support, McGuinty is backing off on his plans to privatize more services.

Surely Andrea & Co. will demand more than that, eh, else why would we have voted for them?!

Absolutely.  Tax reform, defending the poor, and stopping the privatization of services are certainly some of the reasons that I voted NDP.  Kudos to Andrea!

ygtbk

Quote:

The Star assumes Stephen Harper is lying any time it sees his lips moving; it gives McGuinty the benefit of the doubt until it can no longer avoid admitting that once again he’s treating the truth with magnificent disdain.

Nailed it!

NDPP

Austerity Budget Adopted

http://www.cpcml.ca/OPF2012/OPF02039.HTM

"...Political parties are no longer 'primary organizations' which link the citizens to the political power. This link used to take place by virtue of membership in riding associations which discussed policy to set the party's direction at a time when candidates and Members of the Provincial Parliament (MPPs) were beholden to party members because of the funds raised by the riding associations.

A cartel party system has emerged where now all parties functions are manipulated from on high. Secret deals are struck behind the backs of the people and nobody even knows what they are, let alone the considerations for these deals and who they serve. Despite this, the decisions which are taken by the Legislature affect the lives of the people in a fundamental way because it is their well-being which is being assaulted to pay the rich through the privation of public monies and initiatives.."

 

Toronto Sells Off Housing and Abandons the Homeless

http://ocap.ca/node/1004

"The ugliness of the [Liberal-NDP] austerity agenda is becoming clearer in Toronto. In this year's Provincial Budget we saw cuts to Social Assistance benefits, including the Community Start-Up, which presently allows 16,000 people a month to obtain or maintain housing. It is a measure that can only worsen the crisis of homelessness in Toronto and across Ontario.

Last week, the Provincial Housing Minister caved into pressure from the Ford Administration and approved the sale of 65 units of public housing in this City. Hundreds more are in danger of going the same way and, indeed, the destruction of public housing is the logical end result of this poltiical direction..."

mark_alfred

Nowhere in the OCAP article is the NDP mentioned.  Taking an article from an activist organization and using it to try to imply that there is a coalition between the NDP and Liberals by inserting your own labels into it ("[Liberal-NDP] austerity agenda") is misrepresentative.  Do you have any evidence, besides adding your own misleading labels to one of their articles, that the activists of OCAP view the actions of the NDP in this way?

onlinediscountanvils

mark_alfred wrote:

Do you have any evidence, besides adding your own misleading labels to one of their articles, that the activists of OCAP view the actions of the NDP in this way?

 

Umpteen OCAP speeches and panel discussions that I've heard over the years. Nobody should mistake OCAP for NDP cheerleaders. It's pretty simple; if you attack the poor, you're no friend of OCAP. They railed against Duncan's budget for it's attacks on the poor when it first came out. Their public statement at the time was titled, [url=http://ocap.ca/node/994]"Ontario Budget Declares War on Poor and Working People"[/url]. Given the strength of that denouncement, do you imagine that their feelings about the budget changed just because Horwath managed to get a 1% sub-inflationary increase to social assistance rates, leaving all the other cuts intact? If so, you don't know OCAP.

mark_alfred

I do not feel that their feelings toward the budget changed.  And I realize that OCAP has been critical of the NDP in the past.  However, arbitrarily applying labels to a recent OCAP article to insinuate that the NDP are in approval and are perceived as being in approval of the direction in which the current Liberal Party is taking is disingenuous.