Syria #6

112 posts / 0 new

Topic locked

Mon, 2012-06-18 14:41

Fidel

[url=http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9103082414][size=14]Jordanian MP: US Equipping Al-Qaeda in Syria, Region[/size][/url]

Quote:
Many senior analysts and political experts in the Middle-East are concerned about the growing alliance between the US and the Al Qaeda terrorist group, cautioning that Washington is reviving the group to target security of the region.

Speaking to FNA, Director of the Arab and International Strategic Studies Center Qaleb Qandil said that Washington has freed hundreds of al-Qaeda prisoners in Iraq before withdrawing its forces from the war-torn country and infiltrated these terrorists into Syria to carry out attacks against the Syrian people.

He pointed to the recent terrorist bombings in Damascus that killed dozens of people, and stated, "The incident reminds us of those cases in which the US and its allies provoked the al-Qaeda elements in the region."

Al-Qa'eda = Al-CIA'da

The glasnost is half full.

Mon, 2012-06-18 14:53

#103

NDPP

Syria #6 Closes - Syria #7 here:

http://rabble.ca/comment/1353316

Mon, 2012-06-18 15:05

#104

kropotkin1951

CDN_FORCES wrote:

Truly a fantastic source that Daily Star. Not sexist or tabloid-y at all...

No denying the facts so you attack the source of the report.

Do you disagree that having intelligence agencies actively supporting an armed insurrection in another country is an act of war? Or do you prefer to do an imitation of the three monkeys every time you are presented with facts.

Mon, 2012-06-18 15:13

#105

CDN_FORCES

kropotkin1951 wrote:

No denying the facts so you attack the source of the report.

Do you disagree that having intelligence agencies actively supporting an armed insurrection in another country is an act of war? Or do you prefer to do an imitation of the three monkeys every time you are presented with facts.

There aren't any "facts" to deny...nothing reliable anyway considering the source is equal to National Enquirer or The Onion. A T&A rag is not a credible source. (I'm also sure you shouldn't be posting links to sexist and misogynist sites.)

There will be some credibility when the NYTimes or the UN reports it.

Mon, 2012-06-18 15:31

#106

kropotkin1951

CDN-Forces your willful blindness is certainly unrelenting. I hope you get paid well for your efforts at obfuscation. One MSM rag says the British and American are currently doing it and the mouthpiece of the 1% says they are contemplating it. Even the WJ describes active intervention in Syria by NATO that is a breach of international law. So your point is what?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230341040457746476355114904...

Mon, 2012-06-18 16:01

#107

CDN_FORCES

kropotkin1951 wrote:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230341040457746476355114904...

It's a week old article, most of which is behind a paywall, that makes no mention of weapons.

What was your point?

Mon, 2012-06-18 21:29

#108

thorin_bane

willful ignorance is not an excuse

Tue, 2012-06-19 00:47

#109

Fidel

thorin_bane wrote:

willful ignorance is not an excuse

Careful, Thorin. I can say for sure that a new unwritten policy for tolerating pro imperialist points of view on babble is in place and for some time.

Tue, 2012-06-19 11:40

#110

kropotkin1951

I guess that means that peace is not a feminist issue on babble. War mongering has nothing to do with patriarchy and misogyny. It is totally not a issue of fundamental principles. The war games are not a male construct that oppresses people all over the planet. None of CDN-Forces posts enhance the debate from a progressive viewpoint but he does use women as a shield for his views. I find that the icing on the cake.

Tue, 2012-06-19 11:51

#111

6079_Smith_W

CDN_FORCES wrote:

There aren't any "facts" to deny...nothing reliable anyway considering the source is equal to National Enquirer or The Onion. A T&A rag is not a credible source. (I'm also sure you shouldn't be posting links to sexist and misogynist sites.)

That's a really thin charge, CDN_FORCES. How about sticking to the foundation of the article? You could just as easily go picking through the ads or the classifieds in the WSJ.

Come on....

Tue, 2012-06-19 11:57

#112

Catchfire

Yeah, I think I've had enough of CDN_FORCES. Thanks for the memories.

And closing for length.

Pages

Topic locked