Fire This Time activists assaulted by transit police and RCMP

18 posts / 0 new
Last post
max.tennant
Fire This Time activists assaulted by transit police and RCMP

September 4, 2012
 
FIRE THIS TIME ACTIVISTS BRUTALIZED AND ASSAULTED BY TRANSIT POLICE AND RCMP!
STAND AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY!
STOP HARASSMENT AND ASSAULT OF POLITICAL ACTIVISTS!
OPPOSE SUPPRESSION OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION!
 
Campaign updates and videos of the assault available here:
 
 www.youtube.com/firethistime
stopassaultonpoliticalactivists.wordpress.com
 
On August 31, 2012, at Metrotown Skytrain Station near Vancouver, Canada,  Transit police officers and the RCMP assaulted, handcuffed and removed three activists that were peacefully distributing the Fire This Time newspaper (FTT).  Because FTT is a non-commercial, free social justice newspaper, the officers had no legal ground to stop the distribution.  It is clear that the aim of the assault was to intimidate and harass social justice activists which is political targeting as FTT publishes many articles against war and in support of social justice struggles in Canada, from Indigenous rights to labour organizing.  This was an attack on our fundamental civil and democratic rights which include freedom of expression and the right to organize and demonstrate without violence and intimidation.  It is also a case of police brutality, which is a disturbing trend growing in Canada.
 
AUGUST 31: Fire This Time Activists Brutalized and Assaulted by Transit Police and RCMP
 
On the day of the assault, we were distributing the FTT newspaper without incident at the Metrotown Skytrain Station.  After an hour, two transit police officers arrived and immediately began telling the four of us that we needed to leave the station and stop distributing. We showed the officers and read aloud the publicly posted Transit rules available on large boards in every skytrain station.  These rules state that, "printed material for non-commercial purposes will be permitted on transit properties, other than transit vehicles or fare-paid zones," provided distribution does not impede transit traffic or operations.
 
The police insisted that it did not matter what the posted rules state and that there are other rules that are not posted. When we asked what those rules are or how they applied to this situation, they refused to answer.  Instead, the police stated that because they were asking us to leave the station and we were refusing, this was justification for our arrest. This sort of Catch-22 argument never answered the fundamental question as to why they demanded we leave in the first place! 
 
Drawing the attention of many passers-by, who took videos of the escalating police harassment, we continually asked the police, “Why are we being arrested?” “What have we done?” “What laws have we broken?” These questions were never answered. Soon, Shakeel had his arm wrenched behind his back by the officer putting him in handcuffs.   During this assault, Mike, another FTT activist, began filming with his phone. Once the officer realized the assault was being filmed he responded by grabbing Mike's arm and putting him in handcuffs as well. The officer attempted to take away Mike's phone, but he was able to pass it another FTT activist who was consulting with a lawyer and documenting the assault.
 
At the same time, another officer was harassing Thomas, the FTT activist who had been explaining the posted Transit rules. Holding tightly onto a stack of FTT newspapers, Thomas continued to ask the officer "Why are you doing this?" The officer ignored this question, threatening him with arrest and saying he would "hurt" him if he tried to move away.   In response to Thomas' peaceful questioning, the officer grabbed his neck, pushed pressure points on his head and slammed him into a corner.
 
When back-up Transit and RCMP officers arrived, they made the total officer count more than ten, and took Mike and Shakeel out of the station in handcuffs. On the street outside of the station, both had their bags searched without consent and were put in the back of two RCMP patrol cars. Thomas was kept in the station and continued to ask the officer what laws he had broken and why he was being arrested until he was viciously rammed up against the stair railing by three officers, tackled to the ground, handcuffed, and taken out of the station. During this, Thomas was told he was being arrested for “creating a disturbance”. Thomas was put in the back of an unmarked SUV.
 
After some time in the vehicles Thomas, Mike and Shakeel were each told separately that they would be released without any charges but banned from the Transit system for 24 hours. It was clear that the police officers had no reason for arrest, as Thomas, Shakeel and Mike had broken no Transit rules and had been targeted because of the political nature of the FTT newspaper.
 
Thomas, Shakeel and Mike were separately driven to a Burnaby Community Police Station and released. All three of us had to visit the Emergency Room for medical treatment following the assault.
 
Following the harassment and assault, we were never issued a ticket or any written documentation.  We were never told on what basis we were asked to leave the Skytrain station in the first place. During this incident 150 of our newspapers were taken and we have video footage of a police officer holding some of them. Immediately upon his release from police custody, Shakeel checked his phone for the video footage he had taken during the assault and it was not there. This video had been erased during the time that an RCMP officer had his phone. 
 
This was not an isolated incident, but the culmination of four months of repeated harassment of FTT activists distributing the newspaper. However, in most cases Transit officials and police officers were forced to allow us to continue distribution after we pointed out the publicly posted Transit rules and defended our right to continue distribution. The August 31 assault was an escalation of this campaign of harassment and intimidation. We have video footage available for many of these incidents.
 
Stand Up for Democratic Rights!
 
Why is it that after over an hour of harassment and brutal assault we were released without charges and without being told that we were in violation of any Transit rules? Without a doubt if police had had any justification or valid legal reason they would of pursued further action or charges. This makes it clear that the police and transit authorities were politically targeting Fire This Time activists.
 
This assault on our democratic rights is happening in the context of the new era of war and occupation. Since September 11, 2001 the U.S. and its imperialist allies including Canada have begun a new era of increasing war and occupation; from the continued occupation of Afghanistan to the bombing and war against Libya and now threats, sanctions and covert foreign intervention in Syria and Iran. Whenever imperialist governments like the U.S. and Canada wage brutal and devastating wars abroad it is always accompanied by a crack-down against those who defend social justice and protest war at home. As an independent social justice newspaper, Fire This Time spreads a message against this war on working and oppressed people at home and abroad. This assault and continued harassment is an attack on our democratic rights and freedom of speech and expression in order to silence independent voices for peace and social justice.
 
Incidents like these remind us that if we do not defend our rights we lose them.  We will vigorously defend not only the right of our organization to organize and publish its ideas, but the right of all poor and working people to do the same even if they contradict the current government's policies and practices. We absolutely refuse to be intimidated by violence and harassment, and call on all peace and social justice loving people to join with us in defending our fundamental democratic rights.  United we can defend and extend the rights past generations fought so hard to establish! United we can win!
 
We must join together to demand:
 
STAND AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY!
STOP HARASSMENT AND ASSAULT OF POLITICAL ACTIVISTS!
OPPOSE SUPPRESSION OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION!
 
www.youtube.com/firethistime
stopassaultonpoliticalactivists.wordpress.com

[Thread title edited by moderator - please refrain from using all-caps in thread titles. Thanks! -CF]

Issues Pages: 
Regions: 
kropotkin1951

Thanks for posting this important news.  The police are using that catch 22 now on a regular basis.  If they tell you to stop doing an otherwise legal activity and you refuse you are causing a disturbance because you will not follow an order from the police.

The videos illustrate what a police state looks like. No police state kills all the protestors they mostly just harass and bully the population into silence.  The people walking by as these activists were harassed and pseudo arrested just wanted not to be involved and could care less as long as the police were leaving them alone.  Canadians by and large don't seem to want to break the illusion that allows them to believe that we live in an open and democratic society.

ryanw

is it not harrasment and bullying to impede traffic in heavily trafficked areas for personal gain?

what about unsolicited dialogue directed at commuters? all the videos are cropped to not show the earlier behavior that got them their initial shoulder tap

I think there is a somewhat inflated value on 'police brutality' in these cases

 

onlinediscountanvils

ryanw wrote:
is it not harrasment and bullying to impede traffic in heavily trafficked areas for personal gain?

 

What's the personal gain in distributing a free newspaper?

And although the videos don't show what happened prior to the cops showing up, the station certainly didn't appear to be busy enough for traffic to have been impeded by a couple people handing out newspapers.

radiorahim radiorahim's picture

Is that this "Fire This Time"?

ryanw

onlinediscountanvils wrote:
 

What's the personal gain in distributing a free newspaper?

rahim's lengthy link does alot to answer that, I don't think anyone has objections to the proliferation of the newspaper but moreso the actual logistics used; of brushing shoulders with unwilling participants and catcalling them to activate in your crusade.

I'd have thought the incongruent abscence of actual brutality would tip people off that something was amiss

onlinediscountanvils

ryanw wrote:
brushing shoulders with unwilling participants and catcalling them to activate in your crusade.

I'll admit that I haven't watched all 12 videos of the incident, but I didn't see any of what you've described in the ones that I did watch.

kropotkin1951

radiorahim wrote:

Is that this "Fire This Time"?

Is this the same Ivan Drury from your post? Interesting you should use him to try and say these protestors were out of control and harassing people.  Did you read the whole article where this asshole admits he was responsible for destroying the effectiveness of Stopwar?  Why would you post his opinion on anything let alone other left wing groups in the city?

Quote:

While I don’t think the city actually pays Wendy Pederson or Ivan Drury, the CCAP program and DNC function out of the Carnegie. There isn’t a community centre in the entire city which would allow this type of behaviour from programs it runs and controls, why does the Carnegie, why does the city allow this? Are you intimating that all of us across the city should run down to city council and disrupt the meetings and occupy developer’s private homes in order to influence decisions at City Council? If that’s the case, then I will start to organize city wide taxpayer revolts at Council so we can ALL have temper tantrums and behave illegally so we can get our way. Certainly, contacting councilors aren’t getting anyone anywhere … Andrea Reimer is too busy to meet with us.

http://www.genuinewitty.com/2012/06/19/a-letter-to-penny-ballem-about-pr...

onlinediscountanvils

kropotkin1951 wrote:
out of control and harassing people

 

Speaking of which... if interested, you should try googling the author of the blog you linked to.

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

Wendy Pederson and Ivan Drury have done incredible, courageous work for the downtown eastside. I don't always agree with Drury's tactics, but I am not a resident of the DTES. I emphatically disagree with the author of the blog kropotkin linked to. I don't know Ruth Meta, but I don't think her issue with Drury, Pederson and CCAP is representaitive.

That said, the RCMP's actions with FTT are shameful and oppressive. What else is new?

Left Turn Left Turn's picture

As much of I'm not a fan of Fire This Time, what with them  being a cult, the police response looks to me like a violation of their free speech rights.

Lots of groups hand out newspapers and pamphlets at transit stations -- Metro and 24 hrs (Vancouver's two commuter papers), Jehova's Witnesses, ect. It's clearly not illegal to do this.

There was a supreme court case about 20 years ago concerning harassment of the right-wing Larouche Youth Group, when they were leafleting at Vancouver airport. From what I understand, the case says that people have the right to hand out literature on public property, which a skytrain station definitely is, though I'll admit that I havn't read the court case and my information is from a third-party source.

FTT would be well advised to contact the BC Civil Liberties Association on this matter.

onlinediscountanvils

Yeah, CF, I can't say I'm familiar with what level of community services there are in the Nanaimo/Kingsway area, but the whining from this "taxpayer" about about the DTES being spoiled and over-served is a bit much.

I don't have a horse in this race. I don't know anything about FTT or Ivan Drury. At least Drury seems to have taken responsability for things that he regrets having been involved with in his past. Whether that's enough is something that's up to those people who were directly impacted, as well as those with whom he currently works. He seems genuine in his remorse, so I'm not going to dismiss what he says out of hand just because of his past actions.

Whatever problems there might be with FTT doesn't change the fact that they were harrassed and prevented from carrying-out lawful activities in a public space. That should concern everyone, regardless of how one feels about FTT. Because if they cops can shut them down, they won't hesitate to shut you down too.

And just to clarify, I don't know Ruth Meta either. She wrote the letter in kropotkin's link, but she's not the author of the blog that I was referring to. 

ryanw

onlinediscountanvils wrote:

I'll admit that I haven't watched all 12 videos of the incident, but I didn't see any of what you've described in the ones that I did watch.

would they host such images harmful to their own case?

has no one else ever stepped off the skytrain and been funneled between doomsayers of this stripe or another harranguing their captive audience. If you step to the side... they'll step with you; thrusting their papers, causing your arc to widen into pantomime hilarity.

and as was stated earlier, there are lots of people who don't get removed. so it's hardly a wholesale Gestapo roundup of every 'valiant defender of liberty' only the nuisance ones; usually... 

 

onlinediscountanvils

ryanw wrote:
onlinediscountanvils wrote:

I'll admit that I haven't watched all 12 videos of the incident, but I didn't see any of what you've described in the ones that I did watch.

would they host such images harmful to their own case?

 

Meh... I'm going to go out on a limb and guess 'no'.

So your belief that they must have been harassing people is based on the fact that there's no video showing them harassing anyone? I find your process of reasoning curious. Seems like a logical trap to me, where both the existence and non-existence of such a video would lead to the same conclusion.

kropotkin1951

I actually have nothing good to say about the person who wrote the blog about Drury.  I posted it because someone posted a nasty diatribe by Ivan then has the audacity to point fingers at others as being the real bad actors. I took the posting of that article by Ivan to be a slap in the face to other activists. It appears that many of the people involved have a history of being in the face of some people but that does not say whether or not the people passing out papers were harassing anyone.  However the police telling them to move along in violation of their posted rights is clearly harassment.  I am not glad to hear that the new normal in Canada is that they were lucky they didn't get physically assaulted and the fact they didn't means they were not harassed. Truly a Brave New World.

These people were trying to hand out political newspapers and the police told them to move along.  That is a normal occurrence in a police state.  It is  also a normal occurrence for people on the left to attack each other.  Sad to watch.

ryanw

the new normal is to deny the possibility of the left being in the wrong[logistically here]. despite previous histories which everyone here seems all too aware of.

 A real catch 22 exists for these officers who are called for nuisance violations to deal with aggressive citizens and then arrive on scene(or on camera) to see everyone whistling and rocking back and forth on their feet with none of the original complaintants present; because no one is gonna stick around to stop the erosion of their liberties by demagogues when they can just hurry along. It's delicious to impugn others' freedoms in the name of freedom.

if a transit guy can see a hundred people do a Red Sea parting and give a 5 foot circle on either side of this distributor that's a pretty clear defensive reaction; and its not something you see with any 24hrs people who's dialogues never exceeds "paper?"

 

Ken Burch

Did any "transit guys" see a "Red Sea parting" incident, though?

And are you, by some chance, a police officer?

Transrave

It wouldn't surprise me if he was.  He certainly defends them enough... although if I was a cop I'd be embarassed about all these bad apples (like Dzeikanski's killers, and the pair who beat up Bill Conway) who give my profession a bad name.