This thread has jumped the shark a couple of times over.
The shark has defered to NATO lies and become indistinguishable from Harper, or something like that.
So what "information" is Mulcair waiting for, and why should he not be challenged firmly on that point?
That's a good question. But it's a very different question asking "Is there any difference between Harper and Mulcair on Iran?" It's very different from accusing the NDP of "sabre-rattling", or "toeing the neo-con line", or "defering to NATO lies", or "convergence with with the actions of the Steven Harper government" (btw, that was a misstatement of constitutional law that makes said commenter unfit for office). I'm not sure what the answer is to your question (other than acknowledging that strategists often wait to see where their opponents are vulnerable before launching an attack), but at least your question is a reasonable one. For that, I've been calling my MP and Thomas Mulcair's office. Still no response. I'm not ready to draw the inference that the NDP supports imperialism. But I do share your worry that they're insufficiently motivated to prevent imperialism.