‘Eviction of sex workers not a moral issue anymore’

4 posts / 0 new
Last post
susan davis susan davis's picture
‘Eviction of sex workers not a moral issue anymore’

http://www.dhakatribune.com/law-amp-rights/2013/aug/29/%E2%80%98eviction-sex-workers-not-moral-issue-anymore%E2%80%99

“Due to such eviction acts we are being compelled to scatter across the country and run our businesses on the streets, parks or by hiring apartments in different areas. Is this how the government thinks it is bringing welfare and morality to the society?” Joya asked.

She also mentioned that the recent attack on sex workers in Madaripur by activists of Islahe Qawmi Parishad was a violation of the High Court order.

On August 26 the court had extended their stay order for one year, which allows them to reside there. So the eviction was illegal, she said.

Madaripur Police Superintended Faridur Rahman admitted that activists of the Islamist group had carried the attack.

Day before yesterday, activists of Islahe went on a rampage on the 200-year-old brothel in Puranbazar, Madaripur. The brothel located at the heart of the town had around 800 houses 75% of which belonged to the sex workers either by inheritance or by purchasing. The attacks left around 500 sex workers shelter less.

“Such step by the so-called religious and moral people reveals their arrogance in the name of religion. It also shows ultimate disrespect towards judiciary and rule of law in the country. They are using morality and religion as a shield to gain their own purposes,” rights activists Khushi Kabir told the Dhaka Tribune.

“Every quarter such as law enforcers, businessmen and ruling party’s men have interest in our lands. They are interested to build commercial buildings on them,” Tara, leader of Puranbazar brothel, Madaripur said.

When asked about rehabilitation, the leaders of sex workers said there was no point of providing some shabby rehabilitation which ultimately drags them into worse situation than they are already in.

“Usually after evicting, the government hands over Tk10,000 and a swing machine to the sex workers in the name of rehabilitation under the social welfare department. The department does not even bother to know whether we can sew or not,” Joya said.

Regions: 
Mórríghain

So the women who used to have sex with any number of strangers for what... about a dollar or two a day are given sewing machines and told to go somewhere and sew jeans or T-shirts for what... about a dollar or two a day? Now that's progress. One thing is certain, looking for a legal solution to this situation is a waste of everyone's time. Educating the women, all women, starting when they are girls, is the only way to improve the lives of all people in developing nations. Unfortunately as long as religious fundamentalists (particularly Muslim fundamentalists) hold sway the likelihood of women being able to access education is what... about zero?

lagatta

Well, obviously both are horrible forms of exploitation.

It isn't just Muslim fundamentalists who keep women from education, or livelihoods that are not so grossly eviscerating as those "choices" It is deep poverty and inequality.

In Bangladesh, climate change worsens things further still, as a lot of farmland is under water...

Mórríghain

lagatta wrote:
It isn't just Muslim fundamentalists who keep women from education, or livelihoods that are not so grossly eviscerating as those "choices" It is deep poverty and inequality.

Deep poverty and inequality, education for all women... you raise the level of education of all women and poverty declines, life becomes more equitable. When you read the article you see a number of references made to "religious people"; Bangladesh is 90% Muslim and fundamentalism is on the rise, a change which does not bode well.

Quote:
In Bangladesh, climate change worsens things further still, as a lot of farmland is under water...

No doubt these are important factors but they are only two parts of a larger social picture. I wonder how many of the women working in Dhaka's sex trade are doing so by choice? Offering the choice of the lesser of two evils is no choice at all.