So please don't twist and distort my words for some weird purpose. If you haven't absorbed my point about how Canada must not interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine - just go look at the thread I opened to make precisely that point.
Who's twisting what, Unionist?
I know what you wrote about the G20. And my comment wasn't a condemnation of the throne speech protest either; merely pointing out a discrepancy in how you're spinning this.
There was nothing in my post about Canadian interference, and although there is a comment from John Kerry at the bottom, the bulk of it is about Ukrainians dealing with the Ukrainian situation.
If some of them are thankful for international pressure, guess what: that is also their right. None of this happens in a vacuum, no matter how much some of us might want to selectively invoke that rule. And there is a difference between legitimate support, and exploitation.
And again, a handshake from John McCain doesn't change the fact that many of the far right protesters don't want any association with the west either. And before you tar them all with the same brush, you might want to take a closer look at who is doing what, and how many people in each group we are talking about.
(edit)
For instance, the activist who was tortured and accused of being a spy was not a member of the far right. He was with AutoMaidan, and aligned most closedly with Klitschko's UDAR party.
http://www.dw.de/dmytro-bulatov-a-symbol-of-ukraines-protests/a-17404275