I'm not sure, quizzical, why you refer to something called 'pro exploitation'. I haven't ever come across that as a term, so it might be helpful if you define it with a list of who it is supposed to include.
it is always helpful if one is specific when one talks on a subject. That is why i ask where do you get your information from, because i have provided a number of links that all debunk the majority of abolitionist rhetoric, as well as a number of links that provide research, data and facts related to different models. None of which think the Swedish model is working. Not even their own citizens or government and police departments and social services people believe it is doing what the politicians say it was meant to do, nor what they continue to claim it does.
There are new reports about it every year, all of which call it a failed social experiment, or 'not working' or 'didn't reduce anything." The only references we ever see are 'street prostitution was cut in half". Wow, big news. It was 1999 when the law came in, and in 1999 in every city everywhere, there were more street workers than not. But when the internet got popular and escort advertising sites came around, a LOT of those people simply moved indoors and advertised more discretely. The drop in street workers in Sweden was related to the new laws, but half the workers simply moved indoors. Like everywhere else in the world lol.
It's always been about out of sight out of mind. If there weren't street workers, no one would give a damn about trafficking, pimping, exploitation, underage workers, bad clients, good clients, worker's rights, or what they believe sex workers need. And yet the minority of sex workers, and the general publics' perception of just that one group, is going to determine what happens to all the workers. 200 determine for 2000? What other business, occupation, or pastime does the minority needs going to impact what the majority had to live with.