It doesn't matter if I think it is, or if you think it is, or if some church lady in Kelowna thinks it is.
Actually it does matter. In a democracy we infringe on the rights of individuals for the greater good. Seatbelt laws infringe on individual rights. Minimum wage laws infringe on worker rights. Everyone gets to have an opinion and express it, not just the people directly affected. I don't have to be a minimum wage worker to have an opinion. If a bunch of minimum wage workers say they don't want it raised because they are afraid they will lose their jobs, I listen, but I don't have to agree with them and I am free to listen to other voices.
Whether on the street or on the phone, the best way sex workers have to 'size a guy up' is talking to them. Some can do it in 2 minutes in a phone conversation, and I have no doubt at all that an experienced street worker, whether high or not, can do the same.
High level police detectives wouldn't even make that claim. Abusive men walk amongst us all the time convincing everyone they are nice guys.
She's going to jump in that car with or without more time, because she isn't going to know when the next car is going to show up, if ever.
Whether she has 1 minute or 5 to assess the man makes no difference because I don't believe strangers can be assessed that quickly by anyone other than James Bond.
I have never read or heard of any abolitionist ever trying to silence sex worker voices. I believe everyone should be heard and I think the grand majority of abolitionists agree on the right to be heard. This sums up nicely what abolitionists do not want the general public to know:
From the article you quoted:
Some sex workers applaud the laws. “It is good the customers are scared,” said Tina, 24, from Romania, waiting for clients in the streets in central Oslo. “If they try to get more than what they paid for, or if they threaten to be violent, I can tell them: ‘I am going to call the police, tell them where we are and give them the registration number of the car’.”
Numbers are scarce and everyone is biased including those directly involved. That this sex worker agrees with the Nordic model doesn't make it right. I disagree with the particular scenario she describes even though I do support the Nordic model as this particular sex worker does. I don't think it would be a wise idea to threaten the man in that situation. I think it would be dangerous. It's not necessary to be a sex worker to form a valid opinion on what constitutes "safe" or "safe enough".
Solid empirical evidence not dependent on anecdotal accounts and opinions is hard to come by. Even so we can compare the histories and outcomes in multiple countries and form an opinion on the likely outcome in Canada. We can see that laws primarily impact street prostitution, brothels, and trafficking. We don't have to be sex workers to do that.
After having reviewed tons of information, opinions and theories I don't believe there are any simple answers. In my opinion the Nordic model doesn't solve the problems but it does prevent them from growing and does reduce the number of women exposed to the most exploitative aspects of the industry. Enforcement and focus are key. Montreal just shut down some massage parlours but there are many more so laws already exist, they just aren't enforced. It's quite possible that the laws will have practically no impact other than prostitutes no longer being arrested. I think more brothels might get busted but that's just a gut feeling based on the popularity of forfeiture clauses for seizing the proceeds of crime.