Malaysian plane crash

599 posts / 0 new
Last post
6079_Smith_W

ikosmos wrote:

The Ukrainian military and fascist militias are already bombing the area around the crash site (and destroying evidence) and even accelerating the ethnic cleansing of the "Moskals" (ethnic Russians) as well in the DPR areas of control. You would think that the overlords of the Kiev regime in Washington would tell their attack dogs to lay off while the investigation goes on, or tries to, but apparently first thing is first!

What bombing? And again, what genocide? Evidence.

Ukraine declared a 40km cease fire around the crash site yesterday. As for Putin's comments, perhaps he has forgotten there is a war on which he is actively driving. Does he think anyone is going to believe the rebels need all their soldiers to hand over the two boxes? I know he is not so stupid as to believe that.

 

 

nicky

more conspiracy theories mostly peddled by RT.com

"We may laugh at these theories, but it’s worth remembering that they are being pushed by the likes of Press TV and Russia’s RT, both government-run channels for serious international players. It is easy at first glance to see why Russia has an interest in obscuring the truth about the horror of MH17 with a barrage of nonsense: Moscow has lost control of the situation in east Ukraine, and the last thing an autocrat such as Putin can admit to is that the monster of his making is not at his command.

 

But the formulation of conspiracy theories about MH17 is not isolated. Some of us like to believe these theories because the alternative is the terrifying idea that no one really knows what they’re doing; some because it lets us feel superior to others who have never even thought to gaze behind the curtain; some believe conspiracy theories give them a revolutionary edge, in spite of the fact that the vast majority of them come from profoundly reactionary places. And some theories on “Zionists”, “globalists” et al, come from a place of hatred and violence."

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/22/mh17-five-bizarre-c...

 

Slumberjack

6079_Smith_W wrote:
What bombing? And again, what genocide? Evidence.

Exactly.  If it isn't piped in on our corporate network newz channels, it doesn't exist.  We're much better off adopting your rule of thumb, which says that nothing is going on anywhere unless they say so.

6079_Smith_W

No, SJ. I'd settle for having some simple evidence to consider, or even specific claims. The best even RT came up with is a claim that a bomb fell 30 km away from the site. That's not "destroying evidence"; that's attacking Dover by bombing Calais.

And genocide? Well in the absence of any evidence of putting people on lists or rounding them up, those must be some pretty smart bombs they are using. Perhaps they are delivered by magic unicorns who can sniff people's DNA.

It's not like I haven't asked for this (and evidence that the Ukrainian government is in any way fascist) scores of times and heard only crickets in response. Doesn't stop the hauling out of these lies again and again, though.

 

6079_Smith_W

Look at this... those damned fascists are even crashing their planes 25 km from the crash site in an attempt to destroy evidence and cover up their false flag operation:

http://www.smh.com.au/world/prorussia-rebels-shoot-down-two-ukraine-figh...

 

Slumberjack

6079_Smith_W wrote:
No, SJ. I'd settle for having some simple evidence to consider, or even specific claims.

Yes, we know very well that simple evidence is the standard you're willing to accept in your ongoing emphasis of the propaganda being cooked up by the CIA/Kiev side to the conflict.

6079_Smith_W

You might notice I haven't called RT liars for claiming that a Ukrainian bomb fell within the cease fire zone.

If it is zombie planes, crucified babies, or rolling the naked guy in snow because he tried to set himself on fire I reserve the right to express some skepticism. But you have to admit this is beyond thin gruel; it is nonexistent. If people here are making charges of fascism and genocide I expect them to ante up with at least something, otherwise they are doing nothing but passing on lies.

And once they have been called on it it is their responsibility to make sure they can back up their words.

 

 

ikosmos ikosmos's picture

The information blackout notwithstanding, some facts do leak out.

Quote:

Kiev authorities used weapons of mass destruction in villages, towns and densely populated cities in reply to the initially peaceful protest of the people who wanted to protect their rights. Missiles are exploding now in residential districts of Donetsk and Lugansk. Many hundreds of people have died. Those who consider this normal should stop using the stilted phrases about Human Rights,” the senior Russian diplomat stated.

What Kiev is doing now is immoral and inhumane,” Lukashevich concluded.

Even Human Rights Watch has drawn attention to the hundreds of thousands of refugees from the bombing campaign in east Ukraine. About this ... silence. Apparently, it is OK to ethnically cleanse such people. They should be quiet about it.

Meanwhile, the disgusting atrocity of opening fire on civilians and policemen at the Maidan is conveniently forgotten. Promises of "an investigation" are out the window. The sinister objective has been achieved, what do they care about the truth?

So too for the horrific atrocity of burning people alive in Odessa. Nothing, no investigation.

This is the regime that people here are cheerleading. Despicable.

Quote:
250 civilians have been killed and over 850 wounded in June and July in the opposition-controlled city of Lugansk, which is besieged by the Ukrainian military, the daily report by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission said.

so these claims can be independently confirmed. Not that the mouthpieces of the Empire will do any checking. They don't have to.

Video Evidence of the slaughter by the brutal, Israeli-like Ukrainian junta.

 

6079_Smith_W

If you want to talk about this, can we move it to the Ukraine thread? And once we're there, I'll remind you to read the news, because there was an inquiry into the Maidan shootings. The Odessa fire WAS investigated, and included calling in of international investigators .

A weapon of mass destruction is by definition chemical, radiological, biological or nuclear. What is the government spokesperson talking about?

What Genocide?

Israeli-like? How, because they have two legs and two arms? This is kind of like them being Nazi because they use words we can translate into German.

I don't want to be rude, but do you even read any of this material? Or care enough about what might have actually happened to look for corroborating sources or evidence behind the claims?

 

Catchfire Catchfire's picture

ikosmos and NDPP, if we could avoid quoting sources that call Ukrainian nationals "Ukies" that would be great. And link to them only with appropriate discretion and forewarning. Thanks.

ikosmos ikosmos's picture

Catchfire wrote:

ikosmos and NDPP, if we could avoid quoting sources that call Ukrainian nationals "Ukies" that would be great. And link to them only with appropriate discretion and forewarning. Thanks.

 

OK, good point. Some of the Ukrainian sources call those local self-defence forces "Moscals" (a sort of anti-Russian ethnic slur) and another that I shall not repeat in which those who wear St George's colours are compared to an insect or cockroach.

Roger Annis has a lengthy article, well footnoted, in which the gruesome evidence about Ukrainian attacks on civilians in the east is documented. Not for the faint of heart.

The same story is on rabble. ca as well.

ikosmos ikosmos's picture

Those who reject any evidence or argument from RT or Peter Lavelle's show "Crosstalk" need not read further. For your benefit, the US State Department website can be found over here. You will find all you need right there, one stop propaganda shopping. lol. I hope that the racist terms used to describe the victims of Ukrainian bombing aren't used, but you are hereby warned to be aware that such demagoguery may be present.

OK. about Lavelle's show. The link is here. The show is called MH17 Spin.

 

Peter Lavelle's show "Crosstalk" is called RT's "flagship program" for good reasons I think. They have some very impressive experts there, they have some pretty furious and sharp debate, (an Israeli apologist recently walked off the set!) they have "Crosstalk rules" in which participants can jump in anytime they like, and so on. I've never seen so many left of center commentators allowed on a TV show but the show is by no means simply left of center. It's just different from what we're used to. By the way, MP George Galloway has his own show on that network, but you have to go to the website as it is not shown in Canada.

Anyway, about the "MH17 Spin" show. Some good points. For review ...

1. The use of social media as "evidence" by the US State Department. Essentially, the US has used "common sense" and social media to make their case. Unbelievable, but true.  As Prof. Mark Sleboda noted recently that if he had tried to defend his PhD thesis based on such flimsy "evidence" he would have been laughed out of his Dissertation interview. Be that as it may, this is the approach of the State Deparment. We see it even today; social media photographs of parts of the aircraft by journalists completely untrained in evidence is supposed to pass for evidence.

Anyway, as one of the guests pointed out, the fraudulent examples of social media from the US/NATO wars on Libya, (attempted war on) Syria, etc. with the fake twitter and other accounts, Syrian Danny, etc. are now public knowledge. "It strains credulity that the USA would be making a case for such a globally important issue from something like social media," but this is what they are doing. As one guest puts it (paraphrased): "[T]his shows that social media is an appendage of US political establishment, state media, the State Department ..."

(Eric Draitser)

That's good. An appendage of the political establishment. Gotta remember that one.

2. We see the "facts" being fitted to a particular narrative. The Russian bogeyman. So the New York Post, in the absence of any good evidence has, on the front page, "Hey, Vlad, why did you kill my son?" , etc. Demagoguery, pure and simple. So, instead of evidence, piles of emotional triggers designed to short-circuit rational thought entirely.

3. Just to re-interate, we have seen this many times before, and recently too. Iraq in 2003 and the WMD, which turned out to be a pack of US lies, repeated by the satraps in UK, Canada, etc. etc,. The US very nearly started bombing Syria over lies about the use of chemical weapons. Pretty quiet about that now, huh? However, the current drumbeat to war is very SIMILAR to what went on in 2003. But the stakes are much higher now, more dangerous. We have now the "Russian Aggession Prevention Act" by neocons in US Senate, a virtual legislated state of war with Russia, in which this doublethink justifies forward deployment of aggressive military arrangements literally at Russia's front door...

4. But really, let us remember there are real people's lives here. And what do we see? We see that there are "good dead" and "bad dead". The "good dead" are those victims of the plane crash, the Dutch, Malay and many other nationalities killed in the plane crash (including 1 Canuck) in which, sans evidence, despicable claims like that in the New York Post directly blaming the Russian President are trotted out. OTOH, the civilians in eastern Ukraine don't merit a mention. Apparently, they are the "bad dead" and, they may be just as dead but they merit no mention at all.

 

kropotkin1951

So what was that evidence again Bec that you said the Americans could produce?  Its great to get the hard evidence on any unsolved mystery. I would expect nothing more than this level of detail and proof from the Exceptional Empire.

Emphasis added by me

Quote:

The intelligence officials said the most likely explanation for the downing was that the rebels made a mistake. Separatists previously had shot down 12 Ukrainian military airplanes, the officials said.

The officials made clear they were relying in part on social media postings and videos made public in recent days by the Ukrainian government, even though they have not been able to authenticate all of it. For example, they cited a video of a missile launcher said to have been crossing the Russian border after the launch, appearing to be missing a missile.

But later, under questioning, the officials acknowledged they had not yet verified that the video was exactly what it purported to be.

Despite the fuzziness of some details, however, the intelligence officials said the case that the separatists were responsible for shooting down the plane was solid. Other scenarios — such as that the Ukrainian military shot down the plane — are implausible, they said. No Ukrainian surface-to-air missile system was in range.

From satellites, sensors and other intelligence gathering, officials said, they know where the missile originated — in separatist-held territory — and what its flight path was. But if they possess satellite or other imagery of the missile being fired, they did not release it Tuesday. A graphic they made public depicts their estimation of the missile's flight path with a green line. The jet's flight path was available from air traffic control data.

In the weeks before the plane was shot down, Russia had stepped up its arming and training of the separatists after the Ukrainian government won a string of battlefield victories. The working theory is that the SA-11 missile came from Russia, although the U.S. doesn't have proof of that, the officials said.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Powers said last week that "because of the technical complexity of the SA-11, it is unlikely that the separatists could effectively operate the system without assistance from knowledgeable personnel. Thus, we cannot rule out technical assistance from Russian personnel in operating the systems," she said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/22/malaysia-plane-crash_n_5611113....

6079_Smith_W

ikosmos wrote:

OK, good point. Some of the Ukrainian sources call those local self-defence forces "Moscals" (a sort of anti-Russian ethnic slur) and another that I shall not repeat in which those who wear St George's colours are compared to an insect or cockroach.

The only reference I have read in these threads about "Moskals" is in the writings of that seeker guy, who also made racist, anti-semitic and sexist slurs.

And the colours are compared to those of a colorado potato beetle. And the fact is, they haven't always had such an overtly political meaning. I just pointed out in the other thread that they are the colours of the Donetsk soccer team, who have recently relocated to Kiev for their safety.

 

Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

Thanks for posting that. That pretty much reinforces what I've been saying all along... The Pro-Russian guys probably did it (by mistake) with a SA11 they
denied having.

ikosmos ikosmos's picture

6079_Smith_W wrote:
And the colours are compared to those of a colorado potato beetle.

Yes, that is the slur. Somehow I knew you would repeat it.

Quote:
And the fact is, they haven't always had such an overtly political meaning. I just pointed out in the other thread that they are the colours of the Donetsk soccer team, who have recently relocated to Kiev for their safety.

Key facts missing, not surprisingly. A number of the players refused to go to Donetsk to practice, etc., and now the home games (and practices presumably) have been moved to Lviv.

So what you accept for the soccer players safety you treat with contempt for the citizens. Why am I not surprised?

6079_Smith_W

No, actually I posted the story about the refusal too, if you want to go over to the other thread and read it. Not everything in this horrible situation involves hard-line partisans, which was my point in posting it in the first place. One of the things the team talked about was the kind of response they got from the crowds in Kiev and Lviv.

And you weren't sure what kind of bug it was; I told you. Why are you getting pissy about it?

And contempt for citizens? What are you talking about?

Strangely enough, this is not the first time the colorado potato beetle has been used in propaganda; but in the old days they adorned it with stars and stripes and called it the "American Bug":

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-23929124

 

kropotkin1951

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:

Thanks for posting that. That pretty much reinforces what I've been saying all along... The Pro-Russian guys probably did it (by mistake) with a SA11 they denied having.

Imagine my surprise to find you would accept this pap but then since it conforms to your biases it is totally predictable.

With all the weasel words I am not about to believe anyones story especially the BS just out from unnamed "US intelligence sources."  Thanks for proving my point that you will accept anything as evidence if presented by an American source.

NDPP

Catchfire wrote:

ikosmos and NDPP, if we could avoid quoting sources that call Ukrainian nationals "Ukies" that would be great. And link to them only with appropriate discretion and forewarning. Thanks.

 WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! 'UKIE' used here

http://www.ukraine.com/forums/open-board/3762-word-ukie.html

http://calgaryucc.org/events-calendar/e/562/

https://www.facebook.com/ukie.club

The term is used frequently by the overworked blogger Saker of the blogspot 'The Vineyard of the Saker', probably primarily to save his fingers from having to spell 'Ukrainian' incessantly over and over. His indispensible site is a MUST for anyone interested in learning the truth about what's really going on in Ukraine.  http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.ca  I think he also uses 'Rooskies' as well but I'm sure there'll be no complaints about that eh Smith?

 

"Ukie is a Canadian/Ukrainian term that is widely used....I'm very proud of the fact I am Ukrainian! My license plate reads UKIE 1..."

 

6079_Smith_W

I haven't seen him use that term.

swallow swallow's picture

So, ikosmos, do you think your thread has turned out to be more sensitive to the victims than the Ukraine thread was?

Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

kropotkin1951 wrote:

Thanks for proving my point that you will accept anything as evidence if presented by an American source.

LOL, so do you get a prize or something?

Actually I got my idea of what happened from gleaning information all over the internet and I also used my knowledge of how things military works... You've seen the technical stuff I posted here; I'm quit sure I posted stuff (be it thoughtful speculation) on here BEFORE it was reported or brought up in the MSM. All of the reasonable explanations for this event coming from Russia's side of the fence have some pretty big holes in them if you know what kind of equipment was involved and how they perform (like their the SU-24 shoot down theory). Slumberjack made a good observation that the SU-24 can mount the ATOLL air to air missile. That missile, if lunched from a high climbing SU-24, could reach up to the airliner and hit it. But... the problem with that is based on the damage to the airliner I've seen so far(you all seen the pictures) shows it was most likely hit by a shrapnel throwing proximity fused surface to air missile, one that could reach up to 33,000 feet.

And thanks for proving the point that (yet again) you spend most of your time here posting stuff to initiate an attack other people that disagree with you... you really contribute very little to this thread. A lot of people here don't have a good grasp on military stuff... I'm just trying to help them realize that some of the stuff they are reading and hearing from both sides really isn't plausible based on the equipment, it's performance and it's use (in real life).

That jet was shot down by an SA 11 BUK type weapon. 

 

kropotkin1951

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:

That jet was shot down by an SA 11 BUK type weapon. 

That is totally beleivable.  However despite the specualtion neither you nor I know who supplied it and who fired it. The Russians blame the Ukranians and the US blames the Russians.  The idea that the Russians are to blame because they are supplying arms to the resistance forces has some basis in truth but only if you also say that the US is to blame for the civilians being murdered in their beds by the Ukranian armed forces and western backed militias.

Given you like to laugh at the absurdity of Russian propoganda I thought you might be able to laugh at the absurdity of American proganda but apparently not. 

kropotkin1951

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:

Well all I can say is put some vodka in that cool-aid NDPP, it tastes better. I'll see you on the other side.

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:

So basically what you're saying here (implying) is no matter what the USA shows you’re not going to believe it...LOL

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:

Here it comes... I see you two are busy prepping your rejections already.

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:

And thanks for proving the point that (yet again) you spend most of your time here posting stuff to initiate an attack other people that disagree with you... you really contribute very little to this thread.

Thanks for the consistently above the fray posting style you bring to this board.  LOL

eastnoireast

swallow wrote:

So, ikosmos, do you think your thread has turned out to be more sensitive to the victims than the Ukraine thread was?

 

funny.   in a sad, sad way.

 

Webgear

Don't Think Russian Rebels Can Learn How to Fire an Anti-Air Missile? Try This Simulator

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/dont-think-russian-rebels-can-learn-how...

Here's a morbid experiment. Try to see if you can figure out how to fire a Soviet anti-aircraft missile.

Turns out, it's not exactly easy. But it's not at all impossible for non-specialists given some experience and training. The U.S. believes Russia's proxy rebels in eastern Ukraine received training from Russian advisers on to operate a 9K37 Buk missile system that destroyed Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 on July 17.

Turns out, people are training themselves how to operate sophisticated surface-to-air missile systems. 

Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

kropotkin1951 wrote:

but only if you also say that the US is to blame for the civilians being murdered in their beds by the Ukranian armed forces and western backed militias.

Are you saying it's the USA's fault the Ukrainian military is fighting to protect the integrity of Ukraine's national territory from a bunch of armed guys that want turn it over to Russia? 

takeitslowly

are we talking about the same U.S.A that armed Syrian rebels and iranians to overturn their government, or how about Washington's role in the coup d'etat in Kiev ?

Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

Webgear wrote:

Don't Think Russian Rebels Can Learn How to Fire an Anti-Air Missile? Try This Simulator

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/dont-think-russian-rebels-can-learn-how...

Here's a morbid experiment. Try to see if you can figure out how to fire a Soviet anti-aircraft missile.

Turns out, it's not exactly easy. But it's not at all impossible for non-specialists given some experience and training. The U.S. believes Russia's proxy rebels in eastern Ukraine received training from Russian advisers on to operate a 9K37 Buk missile system that destroyed Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 on July 17.

Turns out, people are training themselves how to operate sophisticated surface-to-air missile systems. 

Too bad it wants you to dwnload a program to download the simulator.

6079_Smith_W

takeitslowly wrote:

How about Washington's role in the coup d'etat in Kiev ?

What specifically are you refering to here?

Of course you could add it is the same Washington that had no problem doing business with the Ukrainian government before Yanukovich decided to skip town.

 

 

takeitslowly

6079_Smith_W wrote:

takeitslowly wrote:

How about Washington's role in the coup d'etat in Kiev ?

What specifically are you refering to here?

Of course you could add it is the same Washington that had no problem doing business with the Ukrainian government before Yanukovich decided to skip town.

 

 

And for its part, the Russian Foreign Ministry, also on Wednesday, painted the U.S. and its western allies in Europe as the hidden culprit for the explosion of violence this week. "What's going on [in Kiev] is the direct result of the policy of connivance on behalf of Western politicians and European structures," read a statement from the government of Vladimir Putin. "From the very start of the crisis, [the U.S. and E.U.] have turned a blind eye to the aggressive actions of radical forces in Ukraine, encouraging them to engage in escalation and provocations against the legitimate government."

Dmitry Peskov, a Putin spokesman, said Russia sees the violent behavior of the violent factions within the protest movement as a "coup attempt."

And though many agree that the turmoil in Ukraine has become a proxy political battle with Moscow on one side and Brussels and Washington on the other, Russian historian and Ukraine expert Stephen Cohen is not alone when he says that people in the West, specifically in the United States, are not being allowed to see the political tensions and violence in Ukraine in a full and proper context.

Appearing on Democracy Now! Thursday morning and asked to respond to President Obama's recommendation that Yanukovych withdraw his security forces and cede Kiev to the chaos that has gripped Independence Square, Cohen said Obama's approach to the situation was nothing short of shameful. Cohen said:

[Obama] is saying that the responsibility for restoring peace is on the Ukrainian government, and it should withdraw its security forces from the streets. But let me ask you, if in Washington people throwing Molotov cocktails are marching on Congress—and these people are headed for the Ukrainian Congress—if these people have barricaded entrance to the White House and are throwing rocks at the White House security guard, would President Obama withdraw his security forces? This is—this is—and do you know what this does? And let’s escape partisanship here. I mean, lives are at stake. This incites, these kinds of statement that Obama made. It rationalizes what the killers in the streets are doing. It gives them Western license, because he’s not saying to the people in the streets, "Stop this, stop shooting policemen, stop attacking government buildings, sit down and talk."

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/02/20/ukraine-chaos-and-violence-h...

takeitslowly

Paula Bradshaw, Green candidate for Congress in Illinois, 12th District "By supporting the street protests in Ukraine, the U.S. has empowered a dangerous ultranationalist political movement that includes neo-Nazi militias and has its own politial objectives. It has also facilitated the European Union's attempt to impose an economy based on neoliberal principles that will mean austerity and increasing debt for Ukrainians similar to the economic crisis in Greece. It's hypocritical for the U.S. to condemn the referendum in Crimea and deny the legitimacy of results that favor secession from Ukraine while also embracing the coup d'etat in Kiev. The outcome of the referendum was expected, since Crimea's population is mostly Russian. In fact, the U.S. has been interfering and using covert means to fan the flames of subversion in Ukraine, an objective that has been evident ever since the 'Ukraine in Washington 2013' conference on December 13, 2013. Undersecretary of State Virginia Nuland has admitted that the U.S. has spent $5 billion to influence Ukrainian politics. Coups are antidemocratic and illegal by definition. The Yanukovych government was corrupt, but such governments must be overturned by democratic means, not through putsches."

http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=684

 

kropotkin1951

In America no foreign country is allowed to try to ifluence your political choices.  The US admits to spending 5 billion dollars in the Ukraine on helping the people "chose" their leaders and geting them integrated into Europe. I suspect that some of that $5 billion was used to fund more than instructive manuals on how to put an X on a ballot.

6079_Smith_W

Considering the subject matter here, and the fact we are well off topic I'm going to respond in the Ukraine thread - post 1522

NDPP

Kiev Sabotaging Probe into Downed Malaysian Plane - Self-Defense Leader

http://rt.com/news/175136-kiev-sabotaging-investigation-plane/

"Kiev's authorities have been obstructing the international investigation into the crash of the Malaysian Airlines plane since day one, Deputy Prime Minister of the People's Republic of Donetsk Andrey Purgin told Russia-24 TV channel on Wednesday.

Purgin said it became clear that Kiev is sabotaging the probe two days after the incident, when international experts were not let into the area, as Kiev claimed it could not guarantee their safety. Kiev simply refused to accompany the international experts, Purgin stated. The Malaysian group of experts made it down to the crash alone with no security from Kiev.

It took four days for international experts to gain access to the site. The reason is that even after Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko announced a 40 kilometer ceasefire zone around the crash site, Malaysian experts came under heavy shelling by the Ukrainian army while making their way within the ceasefire zone..."

Stockholm

If the story is in rt.com (also known as The Flat Earth Society) you can be sure its pure fantasy made up by Putin's henchmen.

Unionist

Straw poll time!

Choose one:

1. Moscow

2. Kyiv

3. Washington (aka Langley)

4. Beijing

5. Hamas

6. Tel Aviv

7. Don't know

8. Don't care

9. Can't figure out how to make political mileage out of uninformed speculation about the cause, so stop sending me these polls.

Oh sorry, I was referring to this:

[url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-28448763]Taiwan TransAsia Airways plane crash kills at least 40[/url]

 

6079_Smith_W

I know, Unionist. It's brilliant, actually. Put out two or three sets of lies, even though they completely contradict one another, and just see which one sticks (and sometimes people will believe more than one at the same time). It's quantum conspiracy theory.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ordinary-russians-back-putin-kremlin-s-view...

 

ikosmos ikosmos's picture

swallow wrote:

So, ikosmos, do you think your thread has turned out to be more sensitive to the victims than the Ukraine thread was?

 

Not really, but I think it was a good idea to have a separate thread.

If there is strong evidence, one way or another, some people will suddenly stop posting here. I am rather of the opinion myself now that, other than rather obvious fabrications, we will NOT get a definitive answer for a long time, and, like the US shooting down of the Iranian passenger airliner, we will only really know when one side pays out compensation to the families of the victims. In the case of the US downing the Iranian airliner, the US even arranged payment in such a way as to "deny" that it was for the US naval vessel firing on the airliner, and made rather transparent claims that it was for something else.

Anyway, even if no one else does, I do appreciate your occassional reminders here about the real people whose lives were changed utterly as a result of this horrific crash. I have mentioned already, but it bears repeating, that due to politics we now have the "good dead" and the "bad dead" in which, for political reasons, some people killed in Ukraine aren't deemed important or worthy of mention, and others deserve unending and close attention to all the particulars of their lives.

When you are killed in a war zone, whether on board an aircraft shot down, or bombed by artillery fired from 10 miles away, or shot by snipers in the Maidan, or beaten to death after jumping from a burning building, dead is still dead. And we should remember that too.

ikosmos ikosmos's picture

Fresh evidence from the CIA ... Rooskies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

As you can see, clearly it's a Roosky soldier holding the deadly WMD!

kropotkin1951

I only know what I am told by someone's biased media so in the end,

With thx to Sherpa

 

However specualation is fun and requires no actual knowledge.  I think it's two groups working together. The first is one of the Ukranian ultra-nationalist rightwing groups known for their pejorative anti-Russian viewpoints. They delivered the missiles to a Chechen ultra-nationalist rightwing group known for their pejorative anti-Russian viewpoints who then fired them to discredit the Russian backed separatist government.

 

6079_Smith_W

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/23/mh17-ukraine-separatists-bu...

Quote:

MH17: Ukraine separatist commander 'admits' rebels had Buk missile system

Alexander Khodakovsky reportedly told news agency rebels may have received Buk from Russia, then changes story.

 

kropotkin1951

It woud be great to have a transcript of the whole interview with appropriate translation.  I know I have been misquoted in the press when I was naive enough to enage in speculaton with a reporter. The worst case scenerio discussed somehow became my viewpoint.

 

Red Winnipeg

Why do some posters here reflexively support and defend Russia, which is one of the most corrupt and fascist nations on Earth? Is it as simple as: "The enemy (Russia) of my enemy (the USA) is my friend"?

kropotkin1951

Red Winnipeg wrote:

Why do some posters here reflexively support and defend Russia, which is one of the most corrupt and fascist nations on Earth? Is it as simple as: "The enemy (Russia) of my enemy (the USA) is my friend"?

What I don't understand is how some people can believe either side.

I am a skeptic and that is why I like to poke fun at "news stories" that are nothing but dressed up speculation (see Guardian puff piece above). Depending on whether or not its Russian or American or British coverage of this or any international event I can predict what the slant will be.

I think these quotes from two different far left loonies sum up my personal view of all media.

Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see.”
Benjamin Franklin

“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” Buddha quote

Sean in Ottawa

There is a distinction between believing the opposite of what someone says and not trusting them. Liars sometimes tell the truth. There are people who do not trust the US here and then there are those who automatically assume the opposite MUST be true.

Of course there is a similar idea from those who think that being independent is doing the opposite of what the US does when it fact that is still having them make the decisions. Doing what you want to do regardless of what the other does is independence -- fixation to avoid doing the same is another form of dependence.

Not off topic if you read closely.

Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

Red Winnipeg wrote:
Why do some posters here reflexively support and defend Russia, which is one of the most corrupt and fascist nations on Earth? Is it as simple as: "The enemy (Russia) of my enemy (the USA) is my friend"?

Yes.

kropotkin1951

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:

Red Winnipeg wrote:
Why do some posters here reflexively support and defend Russia, which is one of the most corrupt and fascist nations on Earth? Is it as simple as: "The enemy (Russia) of my enemy (the USA) is my friend"?

Yes.

Are you speaking for yourself?

Slumberjack

Nonsense isn't it?

NDPP

 

'Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities'  - Voltaire

 

Pages

Topic locked