What's ironic is that essentially in this article she is attacking Mulcair/the NDP who have publicly and by their actions in parliament support proportional representation, and yet makes no mention of that. So why attack? Oh, politics as usual.
What's ironic is that essentially in this article she is attacking Mulcair/the NDP who have publicly and by their actions in parliament support proportional representation, and yet makes no mention of that. So why attack? Oh, politics as usual.
Close out this thread