I can't believe I'm opening a thread in Election 2015. Sigh.
"3 per week": Conservative minimum quota for terrorist-related foreign affairs statements
This started April 24, just discovered by CBC:
[url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/bureaucrats-told-to-provide-rob-nicholso... told to provide Rob Nicholson 3 terrorism-related statements a week[/url]
The [April 24] email relays a request from Nicholson's communications team and is addressed to all bureaucrats working in security-related divisions. It tasks them with providing the minister's communications team with "...three MINA (ministerial) statements to the media regarding security in the context of terrorism each week."
Hopefully this thread can help document Harper's orgasmic attachment to terrorist plots, real and imagined, in the lead-up to the election.
Desperate and disgusting.
They can't boast about jobs or the economy so they're going to play the terrorism card.
They have absolutely nothing in their arsenal. The debates should be a real treat.
If Harper actually shows up...
If Harper actually shows up...
Now now, be nice. He might be closeted with his advisors, dealing with an international Jihadi emergency.
If Harper actually shows up...Now now, be nice. He might be closeted with his advisors, dealing with an international Jihadi emergency.
yup, and we're paying the wages for them to feed us this shit!!!
To quote someone from my FB friends.
"The RCMP have various "Mr Big Terrorist" stings just ready to bring forward during the campaign. I am sure there are other mentally ill people that they can buy the ingredients for bombs for and provide them logistic support to execute an agent provocateur supplied plan, before arresting them to prevent a terrorist plot. What a Brave New World we live in."
If by any chance an attack happens from now until the election it will be a blatant false flag operation. That's not a conspiracy theory.
I can't believe I'm opening a thread in Election 2015. Sigh.
Which is why I posted it in the C-51 thread earlier...but glad it's more prominent here now. With it I posted this as well:
C-51 Not In Keeping With Canada's International Obligations: UN
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/bill-c-51-not-in-keeping-wi...
Not that Canada seems to have much of a problem trashing law anymore, international or domestic...