Life at Fertilization Bill introduced in U.S. Congress

17 posts / 0 new
Last post
6079_Smith_W
Life at Fertilization Bill introduced in U.S. Congress

Here it comes

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/586/all-info

Along with Trump's executive order ending funding to any NGO which counsels abortion:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38724063

 

 

 

Issues Pages: 
bekayne

http://www.salon.com/2014/11/05/americas_worst_new_congressman_why_georg...

America’s worst new congressman: Why Georgia’s Jody Hice is so frightening. He thinks abortion is "worse than Hitler," and hates gays, women and Muslims. Here's what's headed to Congress

Unionist

From Telesur:

[url=http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Trump-Global-Gag-Rule-on-Abortion-... Global Gag Rule on Abortion 'Will Cost Women Their Lives'[/url]

 

Unionist

Closer to home for a moment... does anyone know whether Trudeau has eliminated Harper's anti-abortion restriction on foreign aid?

From 2010:

[url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/no-abortion-in-canada-s-g8-maternal-heal... abortion in Canada's G8 maternal health plan[/url]

 

sherpa-finn

In May 2016, Global Affairs Canada announced that “The government will close existing gaps in reproductive rights and health care for women as part of its commitment to refocus Canada’s development assistance on helping the poorest and most vulnerable. It will also ensure that maternal, newborn and child health programming is driven by evidence and outcomes...The inclusion or exclusion of specific health services is under the purview of recipient countries.”

 

Unionist

sherpa-finn wrote:

In May 2016, Global Affairs Canada announced that “The government will close existing gaps in reproductive rights and health care for women as part of its commitment to refocus Canada’s development assistance on helping the poorest and most vulnerable. It will also ensure that maternal, newborn and child health programming is driven by evidence and outcomes...The inclusion or exclusion of specific health services is under the purview of recipient countries.”

 

Thanks, sherpa-finn. I'm guessing they didn't see the need to provide an English translation?

sherpa-finn

Yeah, one has to read between the lines a bit.  That quote is from an explanatory (?) e-mail from Global Affairs that accompanied Int'l Development Minister Bibeau's speech at a donors conference on women's health issue in May, 2016. In the speech itself, the Minister said: 

"Sexual and reproductive health is not just a health issue, it is a human rights issue and a gender equality issue. This is why Canada supports the leadership and meaningful participation of women and girls in decision making at all levels. And that includes decisions related to their health and rights. They must be able to decide if and when to have children, and they must feel free to make those decisions themselves. Services that ensure sexual and reproductive health, including knowledge and the availability of contraceptives and the freedom to access them, are critical. Canada is committed to supporting access to the full range of sexual and reproductive health services for women and adolescents, which will make it possible for them to realize and enjoy their full human rights."

The full text is on the Global Affairs website. Certainly the domestic anti-abortion crowd viewed it as the opening of "the floodgates" to abortion funding and kicked up a bit of a fuss at the time. Effectively, it just removed the constraints against funding for abortion services (as part of the wider range of reproductive health services) that had been introduced under Harper. 

Timebandit Timebandit's picture

I'm hoping that means that abortion is included, as it sounds like it is. Im sick about what's going on in the US. And just so tired of this fight.

6079_Smith_W

If they are really going this far with it, I am wondering if the day might come when they might try to extradite people from here for whatever their ultimate goal is. It's not like they haven't done exactly that in their war on drugs.

 

kropotkin1951

Timebandit wrote:

I'm hoping that means that abortion is included, as it sounds like it is. Im sick about what's going on in the US. And just so tired of this fight.

Of course as a Canadian we have had PEI with no abortions performed for decades. They are at least moving in the right direction.

josh

As long as there's a filibuster in the senate, the bill won't pass.

sherpa-finn

josh wrote:
As long as there's a filibuster in the senate, the bill won't pass.

If you are referring to the Life at Fertilization Bill this is probably true. 

As to the Global Gag Rule, - that does not actually go for a vote in Congress. Its basically an executive order that each incoming president has signed on hs first week of work, - Democrats rescinding it and Republicans re-instating it.

This rule speaks exclusively to US taxpayers dollars funding abortion-related programming overseas, and does not address domestic reproductive health programs or services.

Any such changes in that regard will require legislative action, - if not directly to restrict access, then to eliminate funding through appropriations bills (the more likely route IMHO).  

Sineed

alan smithee alan smithee's picture

Life at erection coming soon.

6079_Smith_W

Netherlands steps in to replace what Trump took away.

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/01/25/netherlands-counters-trump...

quizzical

There's some big boycott going on of Hobby Lobby (not sure what they are in the US just found on my fb feed)  who wants to or has won the right not to pay for employees birth control costs but yet pays for viagra for the mens..

6079_Smith_W

Canada will increase reproductive health funding.

http://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-friday-edition-1.39555...