Chrystia Freeland Set For Trade Talks With China
http://www.china.ca/news/politics/freeland-china-free-trade-talks-1.3906933
"International Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland says she's tentatively booked to have her first face-to-face discussion with China in February as Canada explores a free-trade agreement with the country..."
Yikes!
So scary I screwed up the URL... try this:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/freeland-china-free-trade-talks-1.3906933
So...China trades with Russia: Good China! China trades with Canada: Bad China!
So...China trades with Russia: Good China! China trades with Canada: Bad China!
Not to mention that, for decades, the Canadian left has been saying that we need to look for other trading partners besides the Americans, get out from under Uncle Sam's thumb, etc.
But now that we ARE finding other sources of trade, it's suddenly a bad thing?
Free trade with China? Almost certainly a bad thing.
Trade is generally a good thing and the country we trade with makes little difference. Not so much corporate rights agreements and that means with any country.
Yes, this is not intended to be a thread about China-bashing. Trade with China is a reality. 'FREE' Trade with China will almost certainly be a disaster for ordinary Canadians and Chinese.
Almost certainly.
Yes, this is not intended to be a thread about China-bashing. Trade with China is a reality. 'FREE' Trade with China will almost certainly be a disaster for ordinary Canadians and Chinese.
You got that right.
Holy fuck. Is there actually something we all agree on?
Not to mention that, for decades, the Canadian left has been saying that we need to look for other trading partners besides the Americans, get out from under Uncle Sam's thumb, etc.
What is this mysterious "left" you are hypothesizing?
My "left" - the workers' movement - has been staunchly opposing trade deals with Europe, China, the U.S., the Pacific Rim countries, anywhere, which benefit capital and disadvantage workers and limit Canadian sovereignty.
But very interesting that you and bekayne would frame this in terms of "for or against Russia". I'm going back to watching Trumbo, to try to understand this phenomenon.
This just popped up on my facebook feed this morning:
Not to mention that, for decades, the Canadian left has been saying that we need to look for other trading partners besides the Americans, get out from under Uncle Sam's thumb, etc.
What is this mysterious "left" you are hypothesizing?
My "left" - the workers' movement - has been staunchly opposing trade deals with Europe, China, the U.S., the Pacific Rim countries, anywhere, which benefit capital and disadvantage workers and limit Canadian sovereignty.
But very interesting that you and bekayne would frame this in terms of "for or against Russia". I'm going back to watching Trumbo, to try to understand this phenomenon.
Unlike the people portrayed in that movie, I am not for or against any country. I'm just saying there seems to be a contradiction between saying you want more trade with countries other than the US, but then complaining every time Canada seeks a trade agreement with a country other than the US.
I take the point about a "free" trade deal being different than a regular trade deal, although the CBC article didn't mention any specifics as to what this proposed deal would entail. Is "free trade" a specific enough term that we know exactly in what way this deal will impact Canada?
Not to mention that, for decades, the Canadian left has been saying that we need to look for other trading partners besides the Americans, get out from under Uncle Sam's thumb, etc.
What is this mysterious "left" you are hypothesizing?
My "left" - the workers' movement - has been staunchly opposing trade deals with Europe, China, the U.S., the Pacific Rim countries, anywhere, which benefit capital and disadvantage workers and limit Canadian sovereignty.
But very interesting that you and bekayne would frame this in terms of "for or against Russia". I'm going back to watching Trumbo, to try to understand this phenomenon.
Unlike the people portrayed in that movie, I am not for or against any country. I'm just saying there seems to be a contradiction between saying you want more trade with countries other than the US, but then complaining every time Canada seeks a trade agreement with a country other than the US.
I take the point about a "free" trade deal being different than a regular trade deal, although the CBC article didn't mention any specifics as to what this proposed deal would entail. Is "free trade" a specific enough term that we know exactly in what way this deal will impact Canada?
And let us not forget that before all these international trade deals were negotiated, Canada had traded with other nations for over 100 years without issue. Canada is signing away its own environmental protection, worker rights, and control over its own economy with these deals. It's such a travesty. We are signing away our own sovereignty to large corporate interests. Criticizing an international agreement and its content has nothing to do with being against trade. The key issue is responsible trade, and these agreements fall well short.
This article from a couple of years ago may be helpful:
Canada Ratifies Investment Deal With China Despite Misgivings
http://ctvnews.ca/business/canada-ratifies-investment-deal-with-china-de...
One may safely assume an FTA with China would integrate, deepen and extend these FIPA features.
You don't need a free trade deal to have trade. We had trade with the US before NAFTA. Because of geography we will always have the US as our largest trading partner.
Now if the concern is labour standards and rights then the governments involved should fire all the corporate lawyers and ignore the lobbyists and bring together labour lawyers and indigenous rights lawyers and human rights lawyers and draft trade agreements that give people the right to rip back the corporate veil and go after the oligarchies amassed wealth if they cause environmental damage.
Free trade is not about trade and it is not the vehicle to discuss labour rights.
Canada-China FTA Talks Could Have Massive Implications For Water Use - by Brent Patterson
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/brent-patterson/2017/01/canada-china-fta...
"A free trade agreement with China would likely include an 'investment protection' provision that would make it that much harder to subsequently constrain the growth of the tar sands or to reject new pipelines.
The Globe and Mail has noted, 'China wishes to forge a historic free-trade deal with Canada, but a senior Chinese official said this will require Canadian concessions on investment restrictions [notably in the oil and gas sector] and a commitment to build an energy pipeline to the coast.'
Canada could also be promoted as a country ready for China's water-intensive industries..."
"Free trade is not about trade and it is not the vehicle to discuss labour rights."
Yes, absolutely, and its not about freedom either.
We already have temporary foreign workers in BC from China, without any sort of "free trade" with China. The bad outcomes from free trade deals can happen without a free trade agreement, but with an agreement they get accelerated.
I liked the Fair trade vs Free Trade language the left used in the 80's onwards, but I don't see it as much now.
Any such Free Trade negotiations with China will be conducted with sensitivity to relevent and overarching US policy priorities. I have no doubt Freeland is up to that task given her demonstrated fealty to Atlanticist elite management agendas etc.
Trump Appoints 'Death By China' Author Peter Navarro To Head Trade Office, Hints at Trade War With Beijing
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-21/trump-appoints-death-china-auth...
"The author of books such as 'Death by China' and 'Crouching Tiger: What China's Militarism Means for the World' has for years warned that the US is engaged in an economic war with China and should adopt a more aggressive stance..."
Liberals Try To Assuage Fears Ahead of Possible Free Trade Deal With China, Documents Show
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberal-consultation-free-trade-china-1....
"Canada's Liberal government is reaching out to calm fearss about a potential free trade deal with China as it continues exploratory talks with the Asian superpower, documents show. The documents, provided by Global Affairs Canada after an Access to Information request, show the government is confronting long-standing concerns from business and other stakeholders, including issues relating to intellectual property rights, transparency, the bulk sale of water and human rights..."
There's nothing free about 'Free Trade.'
Trade is generally a good thing and the country we trade with makes little difference. Not so much corporate rights agreements and that means with any country.
Right.
Confusing deliberately misnamed "trade agreements" NAFTA, TPP FIPA, etc, with what trade agreements once meant is a standard mistake.
What these "trade" arrangements actually mean in the pervasive neoliberal world is even greater devolvement of public interest into the hands of corporate priviledge and power. That corporate privilige and power in China are integrated with its government is not an improvement.
It's a little romantic to talk about what is best for "Canada" as if it was an independent entity comprized of citizens. The arragements made by Harper and Trudeau (the current smiley-faced governor for the Canuck Economic Zone)
As for the "Canadian" oil patch (which is majority owned by foriegn interests) expect corpoarate decisions to be guaranteed by threat of lawsuits:
Trudeau pushes tar sands exports through Kinder Morgan pipeline and Canada-China FTA
July 14, 2017
....
A Canada-China FTA would very likely include the controversial 'investment protection' provision that would strengthen a similar provision in the Canada-China Foreign Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement (FIPA). And like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) this provides a disciplinary tool that inhibits governments from taking meaningful action to address climate change such as limiting damaging investments in the fossil fuel industry, prioritizing water for drinking and community use rather than for extractive industries, or respecting the Indigenous right to free, prior and informed consent for projects on their territories....
https://canadians.org/blog/trudeau-pushes-tar-sands-exports-through-kind...
Canada To Decide On Potential Free Trade Agreement With China This Fall, With Asia Seen As Counterpoint To NAFTA
http://nationalpost.com/news/politics/canada-to-decide-on-potential-free...
"The federal government is taking advantage of the distraction of NAFTA talks to push ahead with efforts to boost trade in Asia-Pacific with eyes on a free-trade deal with China this fall..."
Trudeau Dismisses Concerns Free Trade With China Will Hurt Canada-US Relationship
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/james-moore-china-nafta-plan-1.4374026
"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said strengthening trade ties with China does not put the Canada-US relationship at risk, shrugging off concerns raised Thursday by a member of his NAFTA advisory council. Canada and China have completed four rounds of exploratory free trade talks. 'Trade diversification is extremely important to us,' Chrystia Freeland told reporters during a news conference in Toronto..."
Like a bad case of herpes,just when you thought he was gone,he pops up again. He really should fuck off. The negotiations are all in vain..The US isn't interested unless Canada and Mexico roll over and give them everything. His party wouldn't fair any better but they'd be more likely to roll over.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/napping-on-nafta-harper-blasts-trudeau-go...
Trudeau Dismisses Concerns Free Trade With China Will Hurt Canada-US Relationship
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/james-moore-china-nafta-plan-1.4374026
"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said strengthening trade ties with China does not put the Canada-US relationship at risk, shrugging off concerns raised Thursday by a member of his NAFTA advisory council. Canada and China have completed four rounds of exploratory free trade talks. 'Trade diversification is extremely important to us,' Chrystia Freeland told reporters during a news conference in Toronto..."
Harper actually did the most best for any trade between Canada and China. I seriously doubt if any NDP leader was PM, or liberal for that matter, they would have the guts to eliminate the US dollar.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-china-sign-currency-deal-aimed-at...
Authorized by China's central bank, the deal will allow direct business between the Canadian dollar and the Chinese yuan, cutting out the middle man — in most cases, the U.S. dollar.
Now as far as this "free trade deal"??? I wouldn't trust Justin to act on the best interest of working Canadians.
Trudeau Dismisses Concerns Free Trade With China Will Hurt Canada-US Relationship
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/james-moore-china-nafta-plan-1.4374026
"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said strengthening trade ties with China does not put the Canada-US relationship at risk, shrugging off concerns raised Thursday by a member of his NAFTA advisory council. Canada and China have completed four rounds of exploratory free trade talks. 'Trade diversification is extremely important to us,' Chrystia Freeland told reporters during a news conference in Toronto..."
Harper actually did the most best for any trade between Canada and China. I seriously doubt if any NDP leader was PM, or liberal for that matter, they would have the guts to eliminate the US dollar.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-china-sign-currency-deal-aimed-at...
Authorized by China's central bank, the deal will allow direct business between the Canadian dollar and the Chinese yuan, cutting out the middle man — in most cases, the U.S. dollar.
Now as far as this "free trade deal"??? I wouldn't trust Justin to act on the best interest of working Canadians.
The article about a trading hub is not telling the whole story. I read the part of the getting rid of the middle man in the transaction between china and canada. So then this would mean we hold remembi in the international currency reserve, how would faciliate direct transactions between remembi and the canada dollar. You need a decent stash electronic remembi or cash to do an exchange. To my surprise I looked at compostion of Canadian reserve assets there was no yaun/remembi to be seen.
http://fin.gc.ca/activty/oirrep/oir-roli-17-eng.pdf
page 22
2. US-Dollar Holdings Currency interventions to support orderly conditions for the Canadian dollar in the foreign exchange markets are likely to involve sales of US dollars to purchase Canadian dollars, highlighting the importance of owning the most liquid US-dollar-denominated assets. Thus, at least 50 per cent of liquid foreign reserves, measured on a market-value basis, must be denominated in US dollars.
pg 24
3. Other Eligible Currencies To meet liquidity requirements and mitigate currency concentration risk, assets held as part of the liquid foreign reserves can be denominated in currencies other than US dollars, whose reference issuers satisfy the established liquidity and capital preservation constraints. • Other eligible currencies include euros, British pounds and Japanese yen. In order to meet the Government’s international commitments, assets can also be denominated in IMF special drawing rights
No yuan. No direct trade.
Towards the bottom you will see the actual numbers in the currency reserves.
Then I found this article and things were cleared up.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/business/5-things-to-know-about-canada-s-rmb-curre...
Here are five things you should know about the first renminbi, or yuan, trading hub in North America:
Mystery sovled.
Thanks for the added info. This is more involved when you dig deeper
And still more
I’m kind of disappointed that it’s hard to find more recent relevant info less than 2 years old.
