I don't agree with the intervention and threat made on behalf of one of the parties in this thread's antisemitism contention. It is a dangerous road to go down to declare and enforce one right and one wrong in circumstances where both positions have serious and substantial support across the political spectrum in the UK itself. I recall a similar intervention on behalf of a prevailing orthodoxy regarding the 'Arab Spring' which resulted in bannings because someone refused to adopt a majority msm opinion that turned out to be just plain wrong. I do not wish to see the enforcement of favoured or majority views here by a threatening authority, whether I agree with those positions or not. Please reconsider.
I agree.
Me too.
Me three.