As is well known, for some years now highly politicised anti-Chinese propaganda campaigns have targeted the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, often spreading groundless, non-verifiable or outright false information, triggering on these bases a sanctions war and causing serious damage to international relations. There is a dramatic lack of unbiased and alternative documentation on the topic, especially by researchers who have lived and studied in China and Xinjiang.
Yes, I see they came to it from an unbiased perspective.
Are you saying that if the researchers lived and studied in the US, they would be more 'unbiased'?
No, I'm saying they didn't set out to do an unbiased report.
How does one 'set out to be unbiased'? Meditation? A rejection of the 'self''? A variety of authors with different conflicting perspectives?
Or are we just talking about biases that are more in line with your own?