Saying no to concessions

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

In the spring of 2008, the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) union, opened contract talks early to negotiate a concessionary contract in order to give the Detroit Three auto makers (Chrysler, Ford and General Motors) a cost savings advantage they claimed they needed as the economy slid downwards, and also to avoid reopening the contract before its September 2011 expiry date.

Anger amongst the workers spread like wild fire throughout the auto sector in Ontario, but of course every single plant was threatened with plant closure if concessions were not met. At the Ford plant in Oakville, the Oakville Assembly Complex workers were only two years into the newly structured flex plant manufacturing system and were building the Ford Edge, Lincoln MKX, and Flex. Even with the constant threat of their jobs going to Chicago, the workers felt they had been making concessions and opening agreements too many times. Their rank and file, CAW Local 707, rejected the concessions by nearly 60 per cent and made history by rejecting the leadership’s recommendation for the first time in CAW history.

Unfortunately, the concessions were accepted by the three other Ford plants and the attempt to turn the direction of the union around failed. The Ford unit of the CAW is due to return to the bargaining table at any moment. Scared of another rejection vote the leadership of the CAW has been working diligently to convince members to accept more concessions. While Joe Hinrichs, Ford Group Vice President of Global Manufacturing and Labour Affairs tours the United Auto Workers (UAW) to sell concessions to the Ford unit, it is the CAW’s National President who is spearheading the campaign to take more concessions in Canada.

To add to the growing resistance within the CAW, GM’s CAMI, CAW Local 88, in Ingersoll ratified September 20 and only received a 60 per cent in favour of concessions. More evidence the rank and file are not happy with the direction their leadership has taken them.

For the Ford workers in Canada, they have been traditionally pitted against their American UAW comrades but now they are being told they are competing against Mexico, China and India for jobs. A competition for which workers everywhere will always lose.

With each round of concessions made, the workers have been assisting the companies to help transfer their jobs over to the lower waged workers, whether that’s jobs outsourced to new companies or second tiered new hire grow-ins or temporary part time workers, the latter meaning not just low paying jobs but no permanent employment. How much of a controlling share do the Detroit Three have in these companies?

This is a pivotal moment in North American labour history, the UAW and CAW will only continue competing with each other if these concessions pass. What is needed is for both sides to reject any more concessions and stand united, for themselves and to give the GM/Fiat/Chrysler workers a standard to demand for the next contract.

Since the early 2008 ratifications, rank and file members throughout the auto sector in the CAW have been meeting and building a solidarity which is not sanctioned by their National or Locals’ leadership, and with the growing rejection votes it is clearly evident all workers have had enough of giving back.

It is expected that the Ford unit CAW will ratify before the concession fatigued UAW in order to pressure the UAW into further give backs. Therefore it’s imperative these concessions are rejected on both sides of the border. To build international solidarity for all workers, we must reunite with each other, and it is only with international solidarity will we conquer the continuous exploitation of ourselves in the workplace.

Lindsay Hinshelwood is a rank and file member of CAW Local 707.

This article originally appeared in the Socialist Project E-Bulletin and is reprinted here with permission.

Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.