Genetic engineering in Canada to get full political debate

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $1 per month!

For Immediate Release

Ottawa. Thursday, December 2, 2010 - In a surprise move yesterday evening in the House of Commons, the New Democratic Party secured an extended debate, of up to five hours, on the highly controversial Bill C-474 on genetically engineered (GE) crops, currently in third reading.

"We are very excited that, for the first time, all members of parliament will have the chance to participate in a substantive debate on genetic engineering," said Lucy Sharratt, co-ordinator of the Canadian Biotechnology Action Network. "In our 15 year history with this technology, a five-hour debate in the House of Commons on genetic engineering is unprecedented."

Bill C-474 is a one-line Private Members Bill that would require that "an analysis of potential harm to export markets be conducted before the sale of any new genetically engineered seed is permitted." The bill is supported by representatives of alfalfa growers and organic farmers, and opposed by the biotechnology industry.

The extension to the final debate comes after Conservatives and Liberals defeated a procedural motion on October 27 to extend Agriculture Committee hearings on Bill C-474 by 30 days. This decision to abruptly end the hearings resulted in scheduled committee witnesses, including National Farmers Union President, Terry Boehm, being turned away from Parliament Hill on October 28. Now, the final hour of debate ahead of the final vote will be five hours instead of just one hour. This final five hours of debate and the final vote will occur in early 2011.

"This is a great chance for farmers to be heard. Organic, non-GE, and conventional farmers will all now have a fair opportunity to voice their urgent concerns," said Saskatchewan organic grain farmer Arnold Taylor. Taylor, who was scheduled to appear at hearings on Bill C-474 on behalf of the Canadian Organic Growers before the hearings were cancelled, submitted his written testimony to the Agriculture Committee, part of which was read last night by Bill sponsor and NDP Agriculture Critic, Alex Atamanenko.

"The debate over genetic engineering is now finally on the floor of the House of Commons despite all the efforts of biotech industry lobbyists to shut it down," said Sharratt, "With genetically engineered apples, salmon, pigs, alfalfa and wheat on the industry agenda, MPs should prepare themselves to listen to their constituents in 2011."


Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.