Vancouver city hall cancels hearing, vote in support of higher density rezoning in DTES

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Vancouver City Council voted Thursday to postpone hearings on the controversial Historic Heights Report which would have recommended higher density zoning for the Downtown Eastside and Chinatown.

The hearing, scheduled for 2 pm Thursday afternoon, would have allowed Council to hear reactions from affected groups and residents of the communities concerned.

Councillor Andrea Reimer told reporters in front of Council Chambers that they were postponing hearings and a vote on DTES rezoning for higher density in order to conduct social and economic impact studies first. The portion of the report that makes recommendations for zoning in Chinatown will be brought before council at a later date, perhaps in February.

"We received several hundred correspondences from local community groups in the DTES and individuals, and they have all been quite clear. They want to see a local area plan and a social impact study," Reimer said.

The Downtown Eastside Neighbourhood Council, an ad-hoc citizen's group of about 600 members who mounted a "Fight the Height Campaign" against increased density because they feared it would bring gentrification to the the low-income neighbourhood, was mixed in its response to the decision:

"First, we are glad to see that they have finally recognized the wide-spread opposition of the low-income community and the DTES against the recommendations of the Heights Review," said Ivan Drury, a board member of the DNC.

However, he added: "We are sorry to see that they have begun this recognition by excluding the voices of the people who wanted to speak at City Hall today. Instead of allowing this process to go ahead, City Hall rammed through a backroom decision."

But Reimer denied that the process was sudden or undemocratic. Council first began discussing rezoning inssues in the DTES and Chinatown last January, when it directed the City Planner's office to make Policy recommendations for height and density changes. The Historic Areas Height Review was the result of that 2010 discussion.

"Since the issue was first debated last January, we have really understood that a community plan was needed," Reimer said. " Why [the Historic Area Heights Report] came to Council without those two pieces, there's a lot of factors that lead to that. But Council today recommitted to the decision made last January, which is that those two pieces need be part of the process. That will be in the hands of the community."

NPA councillor Susan Anton was disappointed at the sudden decision, calling it undemocratic.

"There were 80 people waiting to talk about the issues. I wanted to know that," said Anton. " This is called debate. You hear the people, you make a decision. There was a certain momentum, and I don't think we'll ever recreate that momentum again."

The DNC's Drury is also critical of the fact that City Hall has separated the issues affecting the DTES from those affecting Chinatown.

"They are continuing to try to divide Chinatown from the DTES, and they are proceeding with a developer program that the low income community in Chinatown does not support."

Helen Polychronakos is a Vancouver-based freelance journalist, editor and teacher. Her blog can be read here

 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.