A jury of whose peers? Trayvon Martin, racism and the U.S. (in)justice system

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

You're probably sitting there wondering "What could possibly be funny about the tragic wrongful death of a young black man whose only crime was being outside at night in Florida?" First of all, congratulations; by merely entertaining this thought, you’ve passed the world’s easiest psychopath test.

Secondly, the joke was literally under our noses the entire time. Anyone who's not a complete airhead understood that there were two people on trial here -- the Hispanic George Zimmerman, and the moral character of a dead Black kid, yet this trial could not have been whiter had it been a Kellogg's commercial in Alabama. As the punchline to this farce of a judicial process, I present Exhibit A -- the jury.

The Jury

Let's meet our stars, identified by what can only be described as Supar Sekret Americanski Terror Proof NSA Code:

- B-37: A middle-aged white woman, husband is an attorney. She used to have concealed weapons permit, but let it lapse. Her husband also has one. That’s just one person, I'm sure that won't play into any bias AT ALL.

- B-51: A retired white woman from Oviedo who has a dog and 20-year-old cat, unmarried and has no kids. Given that her cat is older than Trayvon, her idea of Youth Culture probably involves bell bottom jeans.

- E-6: A young white mother who used this case as an example to her two adolescent children, warning them to not go out at night. You know, because it's the victim's fault for getting shot by a psycho with delusions of grandeur. Oh, and her husband is also a gun owner.

- B-76: A white, middle-aged woman, married 30 years and rescues "a lot of pets." I suppose every jury needs the requisite Cat Lady.

- E-40: A white woman in her 60s who lived in Iowa at the time of the shooting. Iowa was the first state to vote Obama in 2008, a factoid the defense presented while laughing uncontrollably (probably).

- B-29: A nurse on an Alzheimer's ward who is Black or Hispanic, has several children, is married and lived in Chicago at the time of shooting. She said she doesn't watch the news, preferring reality television

But those are just words, tools that even the Bee Gees deemed insufficient totake your heart away, so let's break down the numbers: in a case involving several controversial tenets of American life such as racial equality, gun control and Skittles vs M&Ms, the jury's profile was as follows:

- 33 per cent of the jury had guns in the household;

- 50 per cent of the jury resided out-of-state at the time of the killing;

- 83 per cent of the jury was white;

- 100 per cent of the jury was female.

To summarize, this case rested upon the judgment of a gun-toting, fear-mongering, victim-blaming, out-of-town jury, where the closest thing to a "peer" of George Zimmerman (or Trayvon Martin) was a reality TV junkie. Oh, and did I mention that THE COURT DIDN'T KNOW WHETHER THE ETHNIC JUROR WAS HISPANIC OR BLACK? Let me repeat -- a government entity presiding over a case soaked with racial tension, with a jury demonstrating more than a shade of right-wing preferences, did not know the race of the only non-caucasian member of the jury. That is unless the court has moved so far beyond racism that they cannot identify ethnicities anymore.

Between the law, the court, the jury and the state of race relations in the U.S., Trayvon stood no chance. This entire case is like Inception for racism; the more you peel off, the more you find.

 

Danish Anwar is not at all a terrorist or a communist.

rabble.ca is a co-promotional partner with riotwire, Canada's new hub for political satire, where this article was originally published. 

Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.