Last week, Bell announced plans to implement new consumer monitoring and profiling practices that would greatly expand how it uses the information it collects on millions of subscribers. The planned scope of Bell's profiling is unprecedented in Canada, reflecting the power of a vertically-integrated media giant to effortlessly track their customers' location, media habits, search activity, website interests and application usage.
The Bell plan generated a significant public backlash with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada launching an immediate investigation. Yet the company steadfastly defended its plans, saying that users are supportive of the new policy and maintaining that it is fully compliant with Canadian law.
Given that many of its customers purchase bundled Internet and wireless services, the magnitude of the profiling extends to virtually all media and communications activity. Bell acknowledges that it will be tracking seemingly everything about their customers: which websites they visit, what search terms they enter, what television shows they watch, what applications they use and what phone calls they make. Moreover, all of that data will be correlated with additional data points such as location, age, gender and even bill payment practices.
Bell says it intends to use the data in several ways.
First, it will begin to use targeted advertising to its customers by using its detailed consumer profile. The default for the company is that all consumers will be profiled and targeted. If consumers don't want to receive these targeted ads, Bell will force them to opt-out.
Second, Bell says it will aggregate its data to sell to other businesses and marketing companies so that they can use the Bell network usage for their own purposes.
Bell insists that its monitoring and profiling plans are legal, claiming that it followed "every guideline" released by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. However, the upcoming investigation is likely to focus on whether its use of an opt-out system meets the legal standard.
Last year, the Privacy Commissioner released online behavioural advertising guidelines that permit the use of an opt-out approach in some circumstances. The guidelines may not govern here, however, since they explicitly do not apply to advertising in a mobile context.
In fact, the guidelines also emphasize that opt-outs can only be used if the information is non-sensitive. Given the breadth of data -- which includes locational information, payment records and profiles on interests and media activities -- it is hard to see how it can be fairly characterized as non-sensitive.
Rather, to ensure compliance with the law, Bell should be adopting an opt-in model, where its customers are only subject to monitoring and profiling if they proactively make that choice.
The legal concerns with the Bell profiling plan are not limited to the private sector privacy law. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's policy on Internet traffic management states that Internet providers are not permitted to use personal information collected for managing their networks for other purposes.
If Bell is obtaining some of the profiling information through the deep-packet inspection of customer Internet use, the plan to use the information for profiling purposes would appear to violate the CRTC policy.
Not only does the Bell profiling plan raise privacy law concerns, but customers are rightly concerned that their profile may be disclosed to law enforcement without a court order. The law currently permits disclosures as part of a law enforcement investigation without court oversight (though an ISP can refuse the disclosure if there is no warrant).
In the past, Bell has not committed to requiring law enforcement to obtain a court order before it discloses information.
Online behavioral advertising may be increasingly common, yet the Bell profiling and monitoring plan extends far beyond what virtually any other company could collect. That may prove appealing to advertisers, but millions of Bell customers may oppose efforts to extensively track their location, online activities, payment practices, and media habits.
This post originally appeared on Michael Geist's Blog and is reprinted with permission.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.