Harper imagines a surplus; Mulcair talks to business about job creation

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: flickr/Jeremy Schultz

Like this article? Chip in to keep stories likes these coming.


If oil prices stay more or less where they are for the next four years the Canadian government stands to lose $7.6 billion a year in tax revenue. 

Nobody knows where the price of oil will be four months from now, let alone four years on, so that figure is highly hypothetical. 

The Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) came up with that number as part of an exercise in calculating the impact on government finances of the drop in revenue from fossil fuels.

Since Liberal Paul Martin was Finance Minister, the federal government has padded its budget with a contingency reserve of $3 billion.

The reserve has been there to accommodate unforeseen events, such as war or natural disaster -- or any unpredicted economic turmoil that could cause a drop in government revenues. 

What normally happens when that reserve is not spent is that it is used to retire debt.

But current Finance Minister Joe Oliver has made it clear he is quite willing to gobble the entire $3 billion in order to get his budget in balance.

The PBO says, in effect: Nice try, but it won't work. 

Oliver and Harper give a "revisionist" version of the PBO report

Even if Oliver uses the whole contingency reserve he will still run a deficit this year, says the PBO -- unless of course he increases taxes, somewhere, or cuts spending.

Oliver has said he will do neither, and yet, oddly, when asked in the House about the PBO report, he and the Prime Minister both tried to claim that the report said a balanced budget could happen this year, notwithstanding oil prices.

That, however, is not at all what the PBO report says.

The PBO says that, come what may, its calculations show a small deficit ($400 million) for this year. And that figure assumes the government exhausts every penny of the $3 billion contingency reserve.

More important, the PBO cautions, "The fiscal impacts of lower oil prices considered in these scenarios reflect only the impact of lower economy-wide prices and do not include impacts from lower real GDP that would likely materialize. As such, the fiscal impacts should be viewed as lower bound estimates."

In other words, the government's revenue shortfall as a result of lower oil prices could very likely be greater than the PBO's estimate. Harper and Oliver are not being quite forthright with Canadians in insisting they will run a surplus without new tax measures or additional spending cuts.

Conservatives scurry to claim they plan no new austerity measures

During the parliamentary break period, Employment Minister Jason Kenney was probably closer to the truth when he said the government was contemplating extending some austerity measures, such as public service staff reductions. 

Anonymous Conservative spokespeople shot Kenney's foray into candour down almost as soon as he uttered it.

Meanwhile, economists of all stripes are scurrying about, desperately warning the government that imposing further austerity measures now when we are experiencing economic dislocation would be a terrible idea. Such measures would make matters worse, not better, they all say.

In the face of such admonitions, and NDP demands that the government come clean on the state of its finances sooner rather than later, the Harper government simply says the federal budget comes but once a year. This year is no different, even if the delivery date will be somewhat later than usual.   

NDP proposes small-c conservative tax breaks for businesses

Nature abhors a vacuum, and NDP Leader Tom Mulcair is filling the economic policy vacuum with a few ideas of his own.

In a speech Tuesday to the blue-chip Economic Club of Canada, Mulcair proposed lowering the tax on small business from 11 per cent to nine per cent, introducing an innovation tax credit and extending another tax measure designed to encourage business investment, the accelerated capital cost allowance for manufacturing and processing machinery. 

That last measure allows businesses to rapidly write-off investments over a short time period, where previously the write-offs would have to be spread over many years. This tax break provides a major short-term income boost to businesses that invest in new equipment. In 2011, the Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters association said this measure, then a Conservative policy, would save businesses more than $2.5 billion over five years.

The capital cost allowance is due to expire this year and Mulcair wants to extend it, it seems, indefinitely.

What is perhaps most remarkable about all of these NDP proposals is their utter moderation.

Mulcair does not talk about redistributive tax measures or propose any major direct federal government expenditures. Some of that may come in future policy pronouncements -- but don't hold your breath. The NDP says it is entirely focused, these days, on the middle class, the class to which most voters, it appears, believe they belong. 

For now, any journalist or commentator who might try to read anything at all socialistic or radical in what Canada's Official Opposition party of the moderate left proposes would be engaging in an exercise in fantasy or deliberate distortion... or both. 

Photo: flickr/Jeremy Schultz

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.