The Ontario government has released a list of 13 directives ordering the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) to make drastic changes to the role of school trustees, and clearing the way for closing up to 100 schools.
We have been down this road before.
When the Mike Harris government was attempting to impose its will on school boards across Ontario, it accused the trustees in Toronto and other cities of being "dysfunctional" if they resisted the Conservative directives.
The behaviour of a small number of trustees and board staff was rightly called into question. But in fact many of the individuals who were in the centre of the controversy have gone, either of their own accord or by defeat in last fall's election. In fact, half the TDSB trustees are newly elected by the public -- democracy is at work in renewing the composition of the board.
Before the directives from Education Minister Liz Sandals are implemented, there are some questions that need to be answered:
How many schools and child-care centres will the Liberal government close in Toronto? Education advocates believe schools should be fully functioning community hubs, combining day-time teaching with evening classes for adult learners, child-care facilities, parenting centres and other community services. Once these buildings and the green space surrounding them are sold off, how can they be replaced if the population cycle brings back more young families?
Trustees represent the same number of residents -- more than 100,000 -- as our elected MPPs. Yet MPPs have both an office in Queen's Park and one in their riding, along with three full-time staff of their choosing. Why should trustees be evicted from their offices and stripped of their part-time assistants? Where are they to meet constituents, keep records and notes, and carry out their interactions with TDSB staff?
The minister is suggesting that the TDSB is too big to operate effectively, yet the Liberals have centralized control of nearly all decision-making in an education ministry that oversees the operations for over a million students and hundreds of thousands of adult learners. The only accountability for this massive bureaucracy is during Question Period at Queen's Park -- in the limited time the Legislature is in session. Is this not a double standard about institutions and their scope of operations?
Toronto's schools have been on the cutting edge on issues of equity and services for immigrant families for many years because of the efforts of parents and activist trustees. From creating alternative schools within the system; to English as a Second Language Programs, to Heritage Language and Black and African Heritage Programs; to LGBT equality; to school community outreach programs -- all these measures are essential in making our schools inclusive and inviting. What makes the government believe that parents want their trustees to be stripped of their role as advocates for local schools or neighbourhoods? Do they not want trustees to be able to respond to families experiencing problems with the school bureaucracy?
Why does the Liberal government believe it has superior record on either spending or accountability, given the debacle of Bill 115, the $8 billion wasted on Public Private Partnerships, another billion on gas plant closures, or the ORNGE, e-Health and welfare payment fiascos?
The minister wants to impose a model of board governance on Toronto which drastically reduces the ability of trustees to be champions for their communities. Experience shows that every education system that shuts out grassroots input ends up failing significant sections of the population in cities as diverse as ours.
Before we go down that road, these questions need to be fully answered by the minister and the premier.
John Cartwright is president of the Toronto and York Region Labour Council.
This piece originally appeared in the Toronto Star and is reprinted with permission from the author.
Photo: flickr/Eugenia Vlasova
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.