Last-minute negotiations end strikes at CP Rail

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: flickr/Robert Taylor

Like this story? Chip in to keep labour stories like these coming.

Canadian Pacific (CP) Rail has been pulled back from the brink of major labour unrest, after reaching tentative resolutions with two unions.

Unifor and Teamsters Canada, the unions that represent workers at CP, were both engaged in heated negotiations with the railway company. Contracts with both unions had expired on December 31, 2014.

Unifor Local 101R represents 1,800 safety, maintenance and repair workers at CP in 18 different locations. The union had been negotiating with the company since September, 2014, and had issued a strike notice for February 15 at 12:01 a.m.

According to Unifor, the two parties reached a tentative agreement minutes before the deadline.

The union is currently meeting with local presidents and workplace chairpersons to review the contents of the agreement. Ratification meetings will then be scheduled in locations across the country over the next three weeks. The union says that details of the agreement will only be disclosed following ratification. 

The Teamsters have yet to reach an agreement for their 3,300 locomotive engineers, conductors, trainmen and yardmen.

On Sunday February 15, the Teamsters announced that negotiations had failed at CP and union members were officially on legal strike across Canada.

This conservative government has a history of using back-to-work legislation to end railway strikes and other federal labour disputes, and this year's dispute proved to be no different.

However, 30 minutes before the back-to-work legislation was about to be tabled in Parliament, Minister of Labour Kellie Leitch announced that the government would withdraw the legislation because CP and the Teamsters had agreed to a mediation and arbitration process to address all of the outstanding issues, such as fatigue management, which had caused the strike.

In a press release, Teamsters Rail Conference President Doug Finnson explained that the union opted for mediation and arbitration to avoid a legislated process.

"Our preference is to negotiate these improvements through collective bargaining, and the worst thing that could happen is a legislated process. These issues are far too important to our members to have a legislated process decide the issue. Consequently the better option is to use a fair mediation and arbitration dispute resolution in front of an independent arbitrator, where we can demonstrate that our plan is a proven fatigue management system which is highly regarded for a long time and is far superior to what the employer seeks to obtain."

At another railway, negotiations continue between Unifor and Canadian National (CN) Rail. Unifor reports that negotiations with CN continue to be slow, with little progress. Unifor is the largest union at CN with more than 4,800 members. The union has yet to take a strike vote and no strike deadline has been set.

"The agreement that we reached at CP is the Unifor pattern that we intend to bargain at CN rail," said Unifor’s National Rail Director Brian Stevens.

Stevens told that both the union and the employer had agreed to reach a negotiated contract by the end of 2014 and to do so without involving or disturbing CN customers.

"We just keep running into stalls initiated by CN Rail," said Stevens, who explained that the union has reached a critical point in the bargaining process when they will begin to take strike votes.

Stevens also confirmed that the Teamsters and Unifor have been in "constant communication" while negotiating agreements at both CN and CP rail. 

Ella Bedard is rabble's labour intern. She has written about labour issues for and the Halifax Media Co-op and is the co-producer of the radio documentary The Amelie: Canadian Refugee Policy and the Story of the 1987 Boat People

Like this story? Chip in to keep labour stories like these coming.

Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.