Protests by Indigenous peoples a culmination of centuries of political abuse and neglect

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Image: TOWetsuwetenSolidarity/Twitter

A recent poll found that a majority of Canadians favour police intervention to stop Indigenous protesters and activists from blocking railway services. 

Are these anti-protesters unaware of the long and brutal mistreatment of Indigenous peoples that led up to these protests? Or do they simply not care about it?

In any case, perhaps a brief history lesson may be helpful, starting after the initial invasion of Canada by European settlers.   

Under the infamous British North American Act of 1867, these invaders ruthlessly seized most of the land originally owned and occupied by the Indigenous peoples. It was a brutal imposition of colonialism that stripped more than 60 Aboriginal nations of self-government and self-determination, making them dependent on the federal and provincial governments.

"This massive land grab and our resultant dependency was not only an inexcusable humiliation and impoverishment," said Arthur Manuel, past chief of the Neskonlith Indian Band, "but a colossal act of racism that devastated our social, economic, cultural and spiritual life. We continue to pay for it every day in grinding poverty, shattered social relations, and, too often, in life-ending despair.

"If we try to stop industrial resource companies from moving onto our lands, injunctions are quickly awarded and the police swoop in for mass arrests. Canadian jails are full of our young men and women, incarcerated for trying to resist the assault on our Aboriginal land."

Although the pernicious BNA Act was replaced in 1982 by the Canadian Constitution Act, in which Section 35 clearly recognized and affirmed Aboriginal rights, the federal and provincial governments have since adamantly refused to implement its message.

Even worse, when the Supreme Court in 2014 declared that Indigenous peoples are entitled to claim all their traditional territory, Canadian governments still refuse to abide by this ruling. 

After the Second World War, the United Nations adopted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Canada was a signatory. It states that all peoples are entitled to self-determination: the rights to have their own territory, to be self-sufficient and to govern themselves. 

However, as usual with all such previous legal and UN declarations, Canada still continues to ignore them.

Is it any wonder, then, that this country's Indigenous peoples have become outraged by such a blatant political denial of the basic rights to which the Supreme Court and the United Nations say they are entitled? 

Their decision to vent their rage with railway blockades is the culmination of more than a century of mistreatment and neglect. It is fueled by desperation, by the horrors of the terrible residential schools, by the slaughter of hundreds of Indigenous women, by the imprisonment of disparate numbers of their young people and by the many suicides that stem from agony and despair.

It's regrettable that it takes a disruption of the economy to focus the attention of the media, the politicians and the general public on the abysmal abuse to which our Indigenous peoples have been illegitimately subjected for so long.

But sometimes such a protest is an inevitable last resort. If it awakens indolent citizens and prods guilty governments to take appropriate remedial action, its damage to the economy may come to be regarded by many as justifiable.

Ed Finn grew up in Corner Brook, Newfoundland, where he worked as a printer's apprentice, reporter, columnist and editor of that city's daily newspaper, the Western Star. His career as a journalist included 14 years as a labour relations columnist for the Toronto Star. He was part of the world of politics between 1959 and 1962, serving as the first provincial leader of the NDP in Newfoundland. He worked closely with Tommy Douglas for some years and helped defend and promote medicare legislation in Saskatchewan.

Image: TOWetsuwetenSolidarity/Twitter

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.