TV critic John Doyle of The Globe and Mail told us recently that the CBC had decided not to air a documentary on Tommy Douglas which would inevitably discuss the birth of medicare because it might be perceived as indulging in partisanship during a federal election.
Last week, the CBC aired a show on The Passionate Eye, Medicare Schmedicare, which dismissed medicare and celebrated the glories of being able to pay directly for health care.
This documentary didn't tell us how a private for-profit system would cope with people who are really sick.
- It failed to document one instance of these private companies' treatment of a serious or complex illness, an emergency life-and-death situation, or a case of communicable disease.
- It interviewed only people who had thousands of dollars to spend on what they felt they needed, right now, whether it was medically necessary or not.
- It informed us that if these health businesses discovered something complicated or serious, the patient was referred to a medical specialist right away âe¦. in the public system.
But if you have a hankering for routine diagnostic tests for absolutely everything, with or without symptoms of illness (almost four per cent of these tests revealed something might be wrong, medically) or a quick surgery that can be classed non-medically-necessary hey, come on down; and bring your wallet.
Boy, that's really useful information. What a public service, especially for the 50 per cent of working Canadians making less than $25,000 a year. That's right something under $2,000 a month, before taxes. Half of us.
For the last three elections, medicare has been the top of mind issue in Canada, and for good reason. The media keeps warning that the public system won't be there for us when we need it.
Also last week, The Globe and Mail and The Toronto Star had decided that there is no difference or debate among the three federal leaders on medicare. More commercial health care is inevitable.
The CBC has joined these ranks, with unabashed bias. We were told the socialist revolution is over; long live choice. Those who think medicare is the better way are simply sentimental.
This despite the mountains of evidence that show medicare is the most economically efficient system and the fairest, most compassionate system that has yet been designed.
It took the better part of a century to get here, from the first cooperative on the prairies in 1906, to municipal plans in the 20s and 30s, to a rash of provincial schemes in the 40s and 50s, to a vision that was and remains national in intent health care is not just another service; it's a right of citizenship in this country.
That's a long arc of history. It didn't happen by accident.
Half a century ago, The Toronto Star and the CBC weighed in, against all odds and against mainstream thinking, with stories and editorial positions that made a compelling case as to why it was important for the federal government to support and broaden a program that could benefit all Canadians, no matter what part of the country they lived in or how much money they made. Some of those stories explained what happened to people when they had to pay for care when they got seriously ill. Some told of alternative ways of organizing access to care. Taken together, they created a litany of hope, even expectation, for a better deal for everyone.
It is fair to say these media outlets made a huge difference in what happened next. Untimely deaths were avoided for hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of Canadians. People of all walks of life and all income levels enjoyed longer, healthier lives. Households weren't crushed by the financial costs of illness.
Today's opinion makers, including the CBC, rarely reflect on what we already have, let alone build momentum towards a bold new vision for all members of society. The shiny new thing that is getting the news is a very, very old idea people with money can, and should, buy more stuff. There is virtually no coverage of the impressive improvements that have occurred in the past few years in the public system. The theme is medicare as a black hole, not a treasured public asset.
How out of touch with public opinion can you get? Or are you, as in the past, trying to remake public opinion?
As any parent knows, it is easier to take something apart than build it, and way quicker.
When I first read about the CBC decision not to air the Tommy Douglas documentary, I could see a certain logic to that position, though I didn't agree with it.
But the CBC's subsequent decision to run Medicare Schmedicare is worse than irrational and incoherent. It is an utter repudiation of its very reason for existence: a voice for the public interest, across the whole country, and for the majority of the public.
I suppose one could excuse the newspapers' position: in the end they are simply investor-owned, shareholder-driven enterprises. What's the CBC's excuse?
The CBC owes Canadians better balance, and it can't come soon enough. It has an obligation to reflect the public interest as it affects all citizens. That includes those who have fewer choices by virtue of their earning power, and who have so much to lose.
The debate on what our future holds as individuals and as a society is far from over, and far too much is at stake.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.