The Maple Leaf Model: A progressive idea?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

The goal of the right is to convince people that there is no point in working together to make change. People possess the collective power to make change. The left need this to be widely understood.

With Al Gore and Jeffrey Sachs headlining, Liberal party insiders held a policy conference at Mont Tremblant, Quebec last week, designed to do for progressive ideas what think tanks have done for conservative ideas in past decades: make them dominant.

Billed as a new “ideas generation council,” the conference sponsor, Canada 2020, will hold seminars across the country as well as run the annual headline event. Co-founders Tim Barber, Eugene Lang, Thomas Pitfield, and Susan Smith say Canada needs progressive voices, not to deal with fundamental problems — apparently these have been dealt with already — but to make the most of the “unprecedented opportunities that are staring us in the face.”

A perspective on the website extols our Maple Leaf Model of democratic capitalism for bringing together the best of Japanese, American and the European social market model. Canada is “on a roll,” we are “a land of milk and honey.” What we need to do is make our brand known around the world.

It is true that investments of billions of dollars by business in corporate-friendly think tanks have helped conservatives engineer a huge shift on policy debate. Al Gore, whose film, An Inconvenient Truth explores the issues around global warming, pointed out how Exxon Mobil finances some 40 groups whose main purpose is to denigrate global warming and climate change as serious issues.

It is true that more progressive voices are needed on a range of issues identified by Canada 2020 including climate change, malaria eradication, Quebec-Canada, and fiscal issues.

But it is false to assume that serious structural problems do not exist in Canada, and a mistake to imagine policies can be crafted without addressing political economy issues, including capitalism itself.

Canada 2020 has not analyzed post-Trudeau Canada. If it had it would see that much of the “success” in the land of milk and honey is due to rising commodity prices and a devalued dollar. The real story of a country on the roll is unsustainable growth patterns in the U.S. driving Canadian development. Corporate profits at record levels do not equal success.

A rising dollar, and cooling commodity markets will soon bring into the open severe domestic problems that have been ignored: chronic long-term unemployment in many regions, growing inequality of income, poorly-funded social programs, under-investment in public transportation, recreation and culture, inadequate municipal infrastructure, and a host of workplace concerns over health and safety, discrimination, harassment, poor working conditions and wages.

When examined closely the Maple Leaf Model is premised on people working hard for low pay, sacrificing public services to meet fiscal targets set by bond dealers, and not asking questions about why this has to be so.

The goal of the right is to convince people that there is no point in working together to make change. For conservatives, the market looks after the economy, the political system is ineffective and corrupt, and the best you can do is fend for yourself. This right wing messaging fits well with over consumption and waste embedded in the corporate economy model. Rather than think ahead, drive fast, smile, have a drink and forget the rest.

People possess the collective power to make change. The left need this to be widely understood.

Progressive social movements have been responsible for most of what has been achieved in the past 150 years from the vote to the equality clause in the Charter of Rights. That is why the right works so hard to discredit trade unions, women's organizations, environmentalists and other activist groups.

If Canada 2020 wants us to see ahead clearly, it needs to look closely at the economic history of the country and the planet. If the idea is to redesign the Liberal Party as a progressive political option, then an annual event at a Fairmont Hotel with some American keynote speakers might do the trick. But better optics are not going to make right-wing ideas less dominant.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.