The vocal Canadian: John Kenneth Galbraith

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

Galbraith's assessment of the supply-siders was that we were to believe the rich do not work hard enough because they do not have enough money, and the poor do not work hard enough because they have too much.

John Kenneth Galbraith, the Canadian born Harvard economist who passed away in Cambridge, Mass. recently, had many critics, but few equals. His contributions to economic thought will be remembered, and cited long after contemporary Nobel Prize winners in economics (which he never received) are forgotten.

For an agricultural economist, with an undergraduate degree in animal husbandry from Ontario Agricultural College in Guelph, Galbraith had a particularly exciting career. He was an active Democrat, and policy advisor to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, and two-time presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson, and consulted by leading Democrats so long as his health allowed it.

He became a writer first and an academic second, while employed as a journalist for Fortune before taking up a post at Harvard. His writing skills made him the most famous of Harvard professors. He turned his attention to the depression and The Great Crash may be his most widely known book. His memoir of his childhood, family and neighbours The Scotch was his personal favourite.

He excelled in government administration, beginning service in the New Deal of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, where he ended up running the office charged with setting U.S. prices in wartime.At war's end Galbraith assessed the effectiveness of U.S. strategic bombing and judged it a failure. It was one of many occasions where his policy views would be ignored. The U.S. military to this day believe they can efficiently bomb and destroy the war-making capacity of others.

His position did invoke the rage of key members of the Harvard Board of Regents who endeavoured to block his appointment to the economics department.

His activism also took the form of dissent with polices of the Democratic administration he served as Ambassador to India. His biographer Richard Parker has revealed how Galbraith fought with his friends and Harvard colleagues over advice given to President Kennedy to send U.S. troops to Vietnam, and won the argument, only to see the advisors carry on anyway.

When his friend Kennedy died, Galbraith continued to argue with President Johnson, first privately then publicly. His biographer quotes the first sentence of a memo: “Mr. President, despite much official crap to the contrary, we are going to lose in Vietnam.”

The interest generated in his work sprang from the way Galbraith was so much a part of the world; he was a political animal, deeply engaged with the issues and problems of his times, not simply an observer standing apart.

Faced with the supply-side economics of the Ronald Reagan so-called “revolution” which amounted to cutting taxes for the very wealthy to increase their incentive to create wealth, and reducing access to welfare so as to force people to find jobs, many reacted with indignation. Galbraith preferred irony. His assessment of the supply-siders was that we were to believe the rich do not work hard enough because they do not have enough money, and the poor do not work hard enough because they have too much.

Galbraith lived long enough — he died at 97 — to see the world he was born into change beyond belief, and he believed in change. In that sense he was a liberal, though he was once quoted as saying he was on the left in whatever country he found himself — a Democrat in the U.S., but a socialist in the U.K., always to the left.

His 1992 book The Culture of Contentment summed up what had gone wrong in post-war America. The affluent had got control of the political system. As voter participation dropped to below 50 per cent, higher income people had continued to be politically active pursuing their private interest, but not lower income people. Still later in The Good Society (1996) he argued about the need for an agenda for the common good. The result was that policies Galbraith had been arguing for in his economic trilogy — The Affluent Society, The New Industrial State, and Economics and the Public Purpose — had been lost from sight in post-Vietnam America. It was as if Galbraith had discovered he had not been living in the country he thought he had been living in.

Perhaps he never did leave Iona Station, Ontario, that far behind after all.

Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.