NAFTA and Climate Change

The rabble podcast network offers an alternative take on politics, entertainment, society, stories, community and life in general. All opinions belong to the podcaster; however, podcasters are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new podcasters -- contact us for details.

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Image:  Wikipedia - Syncrude Mildred Lake Facility

The sabre rattling from below the border about reopening the North American Free Trade Agreement has caused a lot of anxiety up here in Canada. What seems to be forgotten by many is that there was widespread opposition to the deal in the first place when it was brought in back in 1994.

Today we present a talk outlining one aspect of the NAFTA agreement called The Proportionality Rule. It's an example of what was wrong with NAFTA in the first place. Today's speaker focuses on a clause which binds Canada but was rejected by Mexico in 1994 when the agreement was first negotiated and ratified.   Gordon Laxer says we should have followed Mexico's lead.   He explains how this clause affects our energy policy, climate change and the politics of the tar sands in his presentation called NAFTA and Climate Change.

This event was held on Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2018, at the Mount Pleasant Neighbourhood House in Vancouver. It was organized and supported by the Council of Canadians, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, the Corporate Mapping Project and West Coast Environmental Law.

Gordon Laxer is the author of a forthcoming report "Escaping Mandatory Oil Exports", outlining how and why Canada needs to dump NAFTA’s energy proportionality rule. He is the founding Director and former head of Parkland Institute (1996-2011) and a Political Economist and professor emeritus at the University of Alberta. He is author/editor of six books, including "Open for Business: The Roots of Foreign Ownership in Canada", which in 1991 received the John Porter Award for best book written about Canada. His latest book "After the Sands: Energy and Ecological Security for Canadians", was a finalist for the 2016 John W. Dafoe prize in non-fiction books and winner of the Errol Sharpe book award.

Thanks to Tania Ehret for recording this for

Image: Wikipedia - Syncrude Mildred Lake Facility 

Like this podcast? rabble is reader/listener supported journalism.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.