Paving Paradise in Niagara: The campaign to prevent housing on an important wetland

The rabble podcast network offers an alternative take on politics, entertainment, society, stories, community and life in general. All opinions belong to the podcaster; however, podcasters are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new podcasters -- contact us for details.

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $1 per month!

Image: modified for use in this post was taken by Emily Spanton and is used with permission.

On this week's episode of Talking Radical Radio, Scott Neigh speaks with Emily Spanton, Taylor Telford, and Rose McCormick. They are involved in Save Thundering Waters Forest, a campaign that has done everything from lobbying politicians to a week-long land occupation this past August in its efforts to save a wetland in Niagara Falls from being turned into luxury housing. 

Emily, Taylor, and Rose speak about Thundering Waters Forest, about the dangers posed by the so-called 'Paradise' development proposal, and about the work they've been doing to stop it.

The 484 acre natural area in question is hidden away by a golf club and residential area to the north, an industrial and commercial area to the east, and an L-shaped bend in the Welland River to the west and south, and even many nearby residents aren't aware of it. Thundering Waters Forest is a rare remnant of the kinds of ecosystems that once covered much of this part of the province – in this case, a mix of savannah plains and old growth forest. Much of it is forested wetland, including 220 acres that are designated as significant wetlands by the province of Ontario.

A company called GR (CAN) Investment Group wants to develop this land, ironically under the name 'Paradise.' At the moment, the provincially designated portion cannot be developed, but the company hopes to use the remainder to build high-end housing, and all of the associated infrastructure, for 10,000 people.

Consultation and discussion related to the proposed develpoment was happening via a number of local governmental bodies over the course of 2016. At various points, the Niagara Region, the City of Niagara Falls, and the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority have all been involved, and from the beginning concerned residents took every opportunity to participate.

The issue initially came to a head when a secondary plan that would have allowed the development to proceed came up for a vote in August 2016. Citizens opposed to the development lobbied hard in the lead-up and then filled the council chamber that night. They were successful in pushing enough councillors to express uncertainty about the proposal that the vote was postponed.

Over a year later, that vote has still not been held. Nominally, the process is waiting for additional studies to be completed about various aspects of the development, but those residents who are paying close attention to the issue say that it is very unclear what is actually going on. They say that even their allies on city council have been unable to get answers about the process, and they have grave concerns about what this might mean down the road for efforts to protect the wetland.

Emily, Taylor, Rose, and the rest of the members of Save Thundering Waters Forest argue that developing the portion of the site that is not currently protected by the province would ultimately destroy the viability of the entire ecosystem, even without developing the rest. And they fear that, either way, approval would lead to a push from the developer to remove the provincial protection from the balance of the land. They even make it clear that they have nothing against development per se. Niagara has many brownfield sites – urban sites that have previously been developed but are not currently in use – that they would love to see GR (CAN) Investment redevelop.

In the year since the vote on the secondary plan was postponed, Save Thundering Waters Forest has not been idle. They have been doing all sorts of public education around the issue, have launched two separate online petitions, and in August of 2017 took the step of doing a week-long occupation of the site to raise the profile of the issue. Seven of them stayed for the duration, including Emily, Taylor, and Rose.  Media coverage and a strategically placed banner drew passers-by to the site, and they offered tours as well as generous amounts of information to illustrate exactly what is at stake if the wetlands are turned into high-price housing. For the moment, the group is focused on building their case against the development, on continuing their public education efforts, and on keeping a close eye on the evolution of the public process with a readiness to intervene whenever necessary. And they have not ruled out resuming their occupation of the site, if that's what it takes.


Talking Radical Radio brings you grassroots voices from across Canada, giving you the chance to hear many different people that are facing many different struggles talk about what they do, why they do it, and how they do it, in the belief that such listening is a crucial step in strengthening all of our efforts to change the world. To learn more about the show check out its website here. You can also follow them on FaceBook or Twitter, or contact [email protected] to join our weekly email update list.

Talking Radical Radio is brought to you by Scott Neigh, a writer, media producer, and activist based in Hamilton (formerly Sudbury), Ontario, and the author of two books examining Canadian history through the stories of activists.

Talking Radical Radio has been nominated for a Hamilton Independent Media Award. If you like the show, please vote for Scott Neigh under the category of "Best Journalist – Social Justice and Human Rights" before November 8!

Image: modified for use in this post was taken by Emily Spanton and is used with permission.

Like this podcast? rabble is reader/listener supported journalism.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.