rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Behind The Numbers

Behind The Numbers's picture
Behind The Numbers delivers timely, progressive commentary on issues that affect Canadians, including the economy, poverty, inequality, climate change, budgets, taxes, public services, employment and much more. Contributors include staff and research associates from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).The views expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the CCPA. Visit the blog at Behindthenumbers.ca.

Grading Canada's economic recovery: The truth about job creation and unemployment in Canada

| December 6, 2013
Photo: pmwebphotos/flickr

This week, Behind the Numbers is publishing a series examining Canada's economic recovery and scrutinizing the government's economic message. Yesterday we looked at GDP and economic growth; today we're looking at employment. And the next two days will be looking at indicators of employment quality in the economy.

"Canada now has the best job creation record in the G-7 -- one million net new jobs since the depths of the recession." -- Speech from the Throne, October 2013

The federal government has used employment growth, or the raw number of new jobs created since the recession, as a proxy for the health of the labour market.

It's easy to see why this is an attractive statistic for communications -- it's a large number and sounds impressive -- but unfortunately, it's a flawed measure of labour market health.

While Canada's record in raw job creation is not bad (in our calculations, second in the G-7 and 10th in the OECD), job creation alone is a misleading measure of the overall health of Canada's job market. The raw number of jobs created in a country is not a useful statistic to measure aggregate labour market health for the simple reason that it doesn't account for changes in the number of people looking for those jobs. And as noted yesterday, Canada has one of the fastest growing populations in the OECD.

A recent Globe and Mail article put it this way:

Since the recession, labour-force growth has significantly slowed; the pace has been 1.1 per cent annually, on average, over the past five years. But even that rate implies that we need to add about 17,000 jobs a month just to keep up. … Since employment bottomed in mid-2009, Canada has added more than one million jobs -- but at the same time, its labour force has also grown by 800,000 available workers.

The simple math of Canada's labour market is as follows:

During the recession, Canada lost 430,000 jobs and 870,000 new people have entered the labour force since the start of the recession. This means that, in order for the recovery to replace the job losses during the recession and to keep pace with population growth, Canada would have needed to create 1.3 million new jobs during the recovery. However, Canada has only created about 1 million positions since the low-point in nominal employment, a shortfall of 280,000 jobs. By not adjusting for population growth, the statistic used in government-talking points ignores these new workers.

Unemployment in Canada -- not yet recovered

Unemployment and employment rates are standard measures of labour market health because, unlike nominal employment, this statistic adjusts for population changes. The unemployment rate is the percentage of people in the labour force, who do not have a job but are actively looking for one.

Recovery in the unemployment rate paints a less rosy picture of Canada's employment situation.

Canada's unemployment rate at the end of 2013 Q2 was 7.1 per cent.  Ranking only the unemployment rate this places Canada at third in the G-7 and 17th out of the 34 in the OECD member countries.

While the current figures for unemployment are interesting for comparison purposes, what is really important is the change over time and, in this case, the proportional improvement over the recession. For instance, Canada's unemployment rate was 8.5 per cent in Q3 2009 and it fell 1.4 percentage points to 7.1 per cent in Q2 2013.  Therefore, there was a proportional improvement was 16 per cent, that is 1.4 per cent/8.5 per cent.

Based on the proportional recovery in unemployment, Canada ranks quite poorly in the G-7 coming in fourth place behind Germany, Japan and the United States.

Yet in comparison to the OCED, this proportional decline in Canada's recessionary unemployment rate appears more modest as 9 of the OECD countries have seen negligible or no recovery in their unemployment rates. Canada ranks 10th out of 34 countries earning a grade of B on our unemployment recovery.

In short, Canada's unemployment rate is declining but not as fast as other developed countries and in particular not as quickly as other G7 countries. Our unemployment rate currently sits 1.1 percentage points higher than it was in 2008 Q2 before the recession hit Canada. Yet in comparison to the OCED, this proportional decline in Canada's recessionary unemployment rate appears more modest as 9 of the OECD countries have seen negligible or no recovery in their unemployment rates. Canada ranks 10th out of 34 countries earning a grade of B on our unemployment recovery.

To learn more about the methodology behind this blog series, click here.

Kayle Hatt is the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives' 2013 Andrew Jackson Progressive Economics Intern.

Photo: pmwebphotos/flickr



We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.