rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Tar tankers: The mystery of the missing moratorium

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Most British Columbians, and many Canadians, probably believe there is a moratorium preventing oil tankers from plying the waters off the fragile and beautiful B.C. north coast. After all, hasn't the federal government banned oil tankers from entering Dixon Entrance, the Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound since 1972?

Certainly, most citizens support the tanker moratorium. Public opinion polling has consistently shown that three quarters of B.C. residents want the tanker moratorium to continue. Especially since the Exxon Valdez disaster of 20 years ago (and, indeed, since the 2006 sinking of the Queen of the North) there is much concern about environmentally damaging oil spills.

Surprise, surprise. The Harper Conservative government (and their allies in the Campbell Liberal government of B.C.) have simply made the moratorium disappear. Indeed, they deny it ever existed at all.

The disappearance of the moratorium was most recently confirmed by the Joint Review Panel of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the National Energy Board looking into the Enbridge Gateway Pipeline proposal. On December 4th, 2009 the panel clearly stated: "It is the Government of Canada's position that there is presently no moratorium on tanker traffic in the coast waters of British Columbia."

Former Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn has argued for the last few years that there never was a moratorium. Instead, he says there's only ever been a voluntary agreement between the U.S. and Canadian Coast Guards and representatives of the U.S. tanker industry to keep oil tankers out of the Inside Passage. This despite the fact that Natural Resources Canada and other federal agencies repeatedly made written reference to the moratorium in documents published as recently as 2003.

This might all be an esoteric debate about history and bureaucracy, were it not for the imminent danger that hundreds of oil tankers will soon be sailing in and out of the Port of Kitimat.

Why has the tanker moratorium suddenly gone missing after more than 37 years?

It's the tar sands, stupid.

The Harper government has repeatedly shown that, when it comes to promotion of the Alberta tar sands,  it will let nothing stand in the way. Not in Copenhagen and certainly not off the coast of B.C. Killing the tanker moratorium is but one example.

The Enbridge Gateway Pipeline project proposes a 1,170 kilometre pipeline to ship an average of 525,000 barrels of tar sands bitumen per day from Fort McMurray to Kitimat B.C. Approximately 225 oil tankers per year would then ship the tar sands product to Asia and California. An adjacent pipeline would move 193,000 barrels of "condensate" east from Kitimat to Fort McMurray (also known as diluent, the condensate is mostly imported from Russia and is necessary to keep the thick tar moving through the piping systems. Tankers are already bringing diluent to Kitimat, where it is now being sent to Alberta by train).

The Enbridge pipelines would cross more than 1000 rivers and streams on their way to the coast. The project is opposed by almost all the several First Nations along the pipeline route.

The Gateway pipeline proposals have galvanized west coast activists. They are demanding that Parliament pass a law to clearly ban coastal tanker traffic and are insisting on a proper inquiry into the Enbridge proposals, rather than the weak and predictable Joint Review Panel process.

Public opinion is on side with that. The real challenge is to move the Harper government aside.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.